Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- ~2026-36537-85 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 793 twice in the last 5 minutes (Common spam/scam phone numbers, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:52, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-36502-88 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:04, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Warned user. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 22:03, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-36508-17 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:19, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- Indihat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 09:30, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- SomeoneExists69 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1160 (LTA 1160, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:13, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- YARTEY1234 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - Komoé River was changed by YARTEY1234 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912704 on 2026-06-23T16:05:16+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 16:05, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- ISRBRK (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1376 three times in the last 60 minutes (Unusual edit count activity, details). Note: This filter has some false positives. Use caution before taking any actions. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:21, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- HelloJuly (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:36, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-36463-57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:40, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- Rees David Rawlings (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1361 (LTA 1361, details). Note: Please see the comment at the top of Special:AbuseFilter/1361 before proceeding. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:13, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- Andrewj91 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 926 (Image vandalism II, details). Note: Please carefully consider context before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:29, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- ~2026-36474-32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 20:27, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- FiddlesticksHD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 21:06, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
- Rockonrocky (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Mamitha Baiju: Edit warring and making personal attacks when their edits are reverted as no sources are mentioned or consensus is taken on the change. Aadirulez8 (talk) 17:10, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:12, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- Kxrce (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. – LuniZunie(talk) 18:21, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Edits do not appear to be WP:VANDALISM. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:14, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- AgencyPrestigious330 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Officialguyforthings (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Goonafagshen (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Businesscoordinator (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- JohnJaneDoe676767 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- KKK investor (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. – LuniZunie(talk) 02:54, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- Mr catkiss photography (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 23:29, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recently released anti-immigrant film being bandied about in online campaigns for positive promos which are of course attracting the usual disruptions at the article by new/temp accounts. Gotitbro (talk) 11:29, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Take the heat out of the edit war that appears to have been going on for the last 2 or 3 days. • a frantic turtle 🐢 solidarity 12:20, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Continued disruption by non-ECP editors. This subject covers Indian caste, such articles are required to be under ECP protection as per ArbCom ruling.[1]. THEZDRX (User) | (Contact) 13:19, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Repeated WP:BLPCRIME violations. Repeated addition of unsourced details about the suspects by temporary accounts/new users. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 14:22, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protected: An unregistered user keeps targeting Linkin Park related articles like this one. They vandalize their new song articles and their new vocalist, Emily Armstrong, performing the same edits with the same edit summaries. They always come back with a different unregistered account so warnings and blocks are not enough. The article, Unshatter, was protected recently for a period of one year because of the vandalism. I think this article needs to be temporarily protected too. Bowling is life (talk) 14:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Most TAs were recently making edits that change dates without providing a reliable source. Love my dreams (talk) 16:38, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:CT/SA article subject to the usual drive by disruptions by new/temp accounts. The PP logs also tell a history of past socking (likely the one edit warring now) and vandalism. Gotitbro (talk) 17:16, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. AriuCH (talk) 17:45, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason: High level of ip vandalism Myuoh kaka roi (talk) 18:04, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:44, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason: Recently a diplomatic Polish-Ukrainian conflict erupted when the Polish President Karol Nawrocki stripped the Order of the White Eagle from the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and this conflict resulted in mass, non-consensual removal of content in Wikipedia's article Order of the White Eagle (Poland) which present not only the Polish point of view about this conflict, but also present the Ukrainians point of view about this conflict, based on Ukrainian and other non-Polish sources. Currently, in the article an anonymous user aggressively provoke edit warring and attempt to deny WP:NPOV in this article by presenting the matter only based on the Polish point of view and by completely removing the Ukrainian officials point of view and related reliable sources (see these edits: 1, 2, 3). The nearly total removal of valuable and cited content about this Polish-Ukrainian conflict was protested not only by me, but also by another user Altenmann (see: his edit). Consequently, I think that it is necessary to apply protection to this article which would prevent anonymous unregistered users to perform mass, non-consensual removal of valuable and cited content. I suggest to apply such protection for at least 2-3 months (maybe this Polish-Ukrainian conflict will cool down in a few months) and revert any further content removals by this anonymous user in this article (if he will do that until the protection is applied to this article). -- Pofka (talk) 19:00, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- Protection No longer necessary: this was a major political upheaval, so I split Polish Order of the White Eagle controversy. --Altenmann >talk 19:08, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unexplained content removals and insertion of unsupported information. Raskuly 🐰 20:25, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:15, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. One autoconfirmed editor vandalized and was blocked by admins. Otherwise, page is quiet. Admins never gonna let you down. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:26, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by numerous temp accounts over the past few days. Streetr4 (talk) 21:36, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 21:43, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason: High level of temporary account vandalism recently, likely due to recent films. End (talk) 21:51, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Edit warring from multiple brand new accounts. ᴸᵃᶠᶠʸTaffer💬(they/she) In solidarity 21:59, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Part of the Armenian–Azerbaijani war (1918–1920), this article has been edited quite regularly by non-extended confirmed editors, in violation of CT:A-A. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 22:18, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated additions of portraits to the infobox without evidence they are freely licensed. ―Howard • 🌽33 23:23, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Unprotection: Was originally going to have a temporary semi protection, but was later changed to indefinite only because "anons shouldn't edit this page." That was 16 years ago, and I highly doubt vandals are still interested on this page. Besides, Circle jerk is not protected. Also the disambiguation page is very rarely edited and has a low view count (only around 10 per day).
P.S.: I used edit source because I can't figure out how to change the "Reason" text to something like "Unprotection." MrCleanAd (talk) 10:23, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
- Pinging @Feminist Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- The protecting admin is PeterSymonds (talk · contribs), who is no longer active. Tbhotch™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 07:05, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please create redirect to from General Shafter to William Rufus Shafter for this US Army General. Guylaen (talk) 23:44, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
- You're extended-confirmed and neither General Shafter nor William Rufus Shafter is protected. Is there a reason you can't just do it yourself? Sumanuil. (talk to me) 01:53, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
On 23/06/2026 UN News reported "Israel continues to commit genocide, atrocity crimes by deliberately targeting Palestinian children, UN independent commission finds". This should be added as a source for the first line of this page were it says that the genocide is "ongoing". I'm aware that there were discussions in the talk page on whether it is ongoing and this seems to be a strong source that it is. ~2026-36609-98 (talk) 21:38, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- Can you provide a link to the specific source? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Object Class: Drygioni 22:46, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
There's two of the same links (which is Tung Tung Tung Sahur) beside each other, and we don't need two links beside each other. It makes more sense to just only have one link.
From this:
- Tung Tung Tung Sahur
- Tung Tung Tung Sahur is an anthropomorphic wooden log who holds a wooden bat.
To this:
- Tung Tung Tung Sahur
- An anthropomorphic wooden log who holds a wooden bat.
There's two of them beside each other, so it's reasonable to remove the other one. Budew1234 (talk) 22:53, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 9 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:59, 23 June 2026 (UTC) |
| 23 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 23:03, 23 June 2026 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled
I have created around 43 articles, mostly about insects and other species. I plan to continue contributing and creating new articles every week. It would be great if I could be granted autopatrolled rights, as this would help reduce the workload for NPP reviewers. Tatupiplu’(she/her · talk · email) 07:20, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
Prolific article creator with Women in Red. I spot-checked their recent creations for notability, copyright hygiene, and text–source integrity, and found no issues. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:18, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting restoration of the autopatrolled user right. It was revoked on 4 December 2025 when I was blocked in connection with an SPI investigation led by Moneytrees. Later, I was unblocked on 11 December 2025 and was advised to spend a few months doing uncontroversial work before requesting the right again. asilvering also advised against reapplying too soon. I followed this advice and waited approximately six months before making this request. Since my unblock, I have focused on uncontroversial editing and have created 22 new articles, most of which were successfully reviewed (Total: 85 articles, 2 deleted). I would appreciate having the right restored so that my new page creations no longer require manual review. In support of this request, I am linking to the most recent comment by Moneytrees. I respectfully ask that this request be evaluated on its own merits and based on my editing record since my unblock. Thank you. Charlie (talk) 03:31, 15 June 2026 (UTC) Charlie (talk) 03:31, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
I have created 25 articles, most of which are regarding historical figures, and some about historical monuments. I plan to continue to frequently create more articles in the future. I would like to be granted the auto patrol right so that the workload of NPP reviewers is reduced. I appreciate any feedback regarding quality, notability and the compliance of my articles to the Wikipedia guidelines. Mintcookie810 (talk) 09:09, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser
I would like access to AWB to fix some common typos. And also add this page is in interest to a WikiProject or some WikiProjects to talk pages. Hamimh2 (talk) 21:00, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
Hello! I'd like AWB rights to correct typos, (I'll ideally choose one possible typo to correct every day, though this might be every week), and to... yeah, typos is basically it. If I want to do anything more controversial, I'll ask for a consensus or an admin check (whichever is more plausible in my judgement). A possible typo would be "definitly". Thanks! In solidarityWikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 00:18, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
Greetings, I would like to use AWB to assist with some tedious and repetitive edits, and broaden my Wikipedia experience. -- Otr500 (talk) 14:22, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
Hello! I would like to use AWB to assist with some tedious and repetitive edits. I like cleaning up references and wikilinks, fixing typos, and it would also be able to build lists of articles with the tool. mikeblas (talk) 01:41, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed |
| There are no outstanding requests for the event coordinator flag. |
|---|
Event coordinator |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer
I'm currently temporarily approved for NPR rights and I've been participating in the May 2026 backlog drive. I'm finding the review process good so far and I take pride in reducing the backlog. I'm hoping I can get an extension in my NPR rights so I can continue working on reviewing new pages. Thanks, DoO2 02:48, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi, I'm requesting for permission to NPR. I meet the guidelines stated and I intend reducing the backlog by minimizing spam, unsourced and promotional content across new pages. Retro music11 (talk) 16:54, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to request page patrolling rights. I've spent a good amount of time on AfD and AfC and have a good sense of WP:NPLACE in particular and the current issues surrounding it. I'm always patrolling the noticeboard in WP:MYANMAR anyways and can review those new pages daily. I would like to help clear up the backlog as well, and monitor any geo articles. I believe I meet the requirements as stated, and often try to help new users within my areas of interests. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 12:33, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
Hello, I am a Pending changes reviewer and would like to have New page reviewer rights to help reduce ongoing and increasing new pages backlog. I have also participated in some Afds and created a few articles and I think I have a good knowledge of relevant policies and guidelines. AristocrSirr22 (talk) 07:44, 14 June 2026 (UTC) AristocrSirr22 (talk) 07:44, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
Howdy! I've been a PCR and rollbacker for 4(ish) years now, and I've always been interested in helping with the backlog. I have over sixteen thousand edits to Wikipedia, spread out across all different spaces, and have always tried to be a constructive editor and productive community member. I've patrolled the recent changes and random pages tabs before, both in attempts to manage nonconstructive edits, and after nearly a half decade of doing so, I think I've gotten used to what poorer quality articles look like! :) Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 00:37, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to request New page reviewer rights. I did have temporary New page reviewer rights about 4 months ago but I went on a break and those rights expired. I used Twinkle for tagging. I have participated in serval AfDs in the last couple weeks. I have just over 5100 edits on my account. I would like to help in reducing the backlog, and help new users improve their pages. Luka Maglc (talk) 03:13, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting this permission because I want to help reduce the page review backlog and help make sure that newly created pages that are of good quality are reviewed quickly. A year ago I was temporarily given the page reviewer right for a month and I reviewed 34 pages, with 33 still existing today and only 1 being deleted. Since then I have had additional experience, including in articles for deletion. Cyrobyte (talk) 22:05, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
Requesting for new page patroller to be granted permanently. Currently nearing the end of second straight month of a trial run and would like to continue contributing in this area. EaglesFan37 (talk) 08:19, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover
Heya, my perm will expire in 15 days I know it's a bit early to request a renewal but I'm going to be busy preparing examinations for students until July (on and off). I don't want to come back and find that the perm has already expired so I thought I'd ask now. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 04:23, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
Hi. I have a history of proposing a few RMs; Lower Silesian Railways, all Poland passenger rail operators, and Henry Nowak. I've also closed several moves (see my most recent contributions). This user right will be useful for suppressing redirects when drafting LLM-generated articles at WP:AIN. Thank you. Fortek67 (talk) 15:58, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
I was granted temporary move perms two months ago, which are due to expire in a couple of days. Requesting renewal; hopefully I've adequately demonstrated my need and use of the permission. {{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 08:33, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer
I am requesting this right so that I can assist in reviewing pending changes more efficiently. I am familiar with the relevant policies, and will use the right responsibly. Thank you. — Raihanur (talk) 07:12, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
I am requesting this permission because, simply, I want to be able to help out with this process (I've already done some work patrolling Recent Changes, a similar process). I've been editing for a while, and I have familiarized myself with the related policies. Axolitl (talk | contribs) 10:16, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I want to have this permission because I feel I am good enough to review pending changes such as some of my Good Article Reviewing that can link appropriately to pending changes articles by understanding notability (such as my articles I made including 61016 and West Midlands Bus route 21) that show understanding of notability (otherwise deleted, or if it is a draft likely abandoned that some recently been deleted, however I do not show interest and understand those topics were not suitable for Wikipedia). Also, another reason is I understand all of the three core rules of Wikipedia rules including WP:NPOV,WP:Verifiability, and WP:NOR understanding of other rules such as WP:DICT, WP:BOLD, WP:AGF, and WP:NPA. 'The one and only' A simple...Wikiediter2029 my edits 21:10, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback
Here to renew my temp perms, I use it on off when I can and idk if I qualify for perm RB yet. JoBo Gamer 11:29, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
OK, I've reviewed what I was told at my last request. I now have over 200 mainspace edits. I've tried singing up to CVU/A, and now I'm just waiting. Requesting rollback permissions to try AntiVandal, Interceptor, and Huggle. And everything else. Patrolling RecentChanges seems to be the only thing I do nowadays, and I would like rollback to be able to fight vandals better. AZenit3 [Chat?-stuff I've done] 01:47, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Been patrolling recent changes for some time now with Twinkle, and I would like to try using more advanced tools like Huggle which require this permission. TheNerdzilla (talk) 13:45, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
I've been using Twinkle for reporting potential SPs, creating deletion discussions and for notifying new users of unsourced edits. I'm requesting permission to the rollback tool as it'd assist me in reverting vandalism and malicious edits. Retro music11 (talk) 20:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Hello. I have rollback in my account at Simple Wikipedia. Having tried this evening to counter the activities of ~2026-33439-05 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), I think it would be useful to have rollback here too. I work almost exclusively on cricket articles at present, and it is a subject that frequently attracts vandals. Thanks. Jack (talk) 19:28, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights: I have been doing RC patrol for the last while, and would like rollback to be able to more efficiently fight vandalism. I understand that my changes that I make while using this tool are my responsibility. signed, A Random Hylian (Parry)(swing) 12:26, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
Here to renew my temporary rollback rights Kadermonkey (She/Her) (talk) 04:28, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
Hello! I'd like rollback if I ever come across vandalism (I see some as a PCR). I check recent changes almost every day, but mostly all the cases of vandalism get reverted by capable rollbakcers. As far as I can tell, this is the best way (and I think you need this for interceptor, which really seems to make it better). Thanks! In solidarityWikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 18:34, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
I've been patrolling recent changes frequently. While my account is still somewhat new (and I took a short break last week), I do have 566 edits so far - mainly involving reverting vandalism (but I have also wrote new articles, reported users, participated in afd, and improved articles). I always warn users after I revert their edits. Ever since I have gained access to Twinkle, it has made patrolling so much easier. I would like rollback permissions to be able to use the antivandal and interceptor tools too. Those tools would make reverting much more efficent. FlammablePizza (talk) 19:29, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
I've been patrolling Special:RecentChanges for a couple months now. I consistently notify editors after reverting their edits (for vandalism or otherwise). Rollback permissions would be useful as I would no longer have edit conflicts with vandals and I could use tools such as Interceptor. Streetr4 (talk) 05:23, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor
There have been three or four times in recent months when I've needed to request changes to template wordings or parameters. These have all been related to cricket, in which I've become moreorless a specialist. It would therefore be useful if I could make such changes myself. I have the necessary technical capability, in both the WP and professional spheres, and I am well aware of the needs for interface awareness and testing. Please ping me if you have any questions. Thank you. Jack (talk) 18:29, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
|
| Requests for temporary account IP viewer |
|---|
Temporary account IP viewer
Would like to be able to check for signs of loutsocking on articles. I have suspicions that someone has done some very slow loutsocking on the article for Nathan Vasquez for example. Insanityclown1 (talk) 03:34, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
Request permission for use of TAIV and TAIVDISCLOSE with special concern for doing complete and thorough SPI-related background checks. Presently, for the past 2-3 weeks my account appears to have been watchlisted by a user associated with multiple temp accounts who appears to be verging upon disruptive editing. The temp accounts have also moved into personal attacks labeling my account as 'demented' and 'incompetent', etc. The growing list of multiple accounts involved in this have included: Special:Contributions/~2026-28259-76, and Special:Contributions/~2026-92659-0, and Special:Contributions/~2026-86111-3, and Special:Contributions/~2026-28744-62 among others. The present background check using these tools would allow me to start the pre-investigation of cross-checking the source(s) of this type of disruptive editing and to double check on any regular accounts which might further be associated with these multiple temporary accounts. I've read the Wikipedia policy pages associated with this tool and understand that all the transactions will be logged and subject to examination and review by sysops. ErnestKrause (talk) 11:36, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
I track articles related to recent deaths, and frequently encounter IP editors adding unsourced deaths to pages. I request this permission because I often encounter malicious hoaxers and the temporary accounts have made them difficult to pin down. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1193#Serial_failed_verification_from_dynamic_IP for stuff I'm talking about. Just today I reverted a few death edits that may be connected to another hoaxer, but I'm not able to determine with my current permissions. (There are also times where an IP makes a legitimate death edit that I can use as a reference, such as Special:Contributions/~2026-33988-59 which I noticed and added to the deaths in 2026 page, but with temporary accounts it's harder to track who is being genuine.) I agree to use the permission solely for this occasional purpose and not to disclose any data. Nohomersryan (talk) 12:29, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
I would like to request TAIV permission. I fulfill the necessary requirements, have read and understood WP:TAIV and WP:TAIVDISCLOSE and would use this for controlling recent changes, countervandalism and fighting spam. AsepTisch (talk) 13:50, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
|
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}{{#if:{{{showtaiv|}}}|
{{!}} showtaiv {{=}} {{{showtaiv}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time. | String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show temporary account IP viewer | showtaiv | Allows hiding the requests for temporary account IP viewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |