Jump to content

Talk:Periyar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articlePeriyar was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 29, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
February 2, 2009Good article nomineeListed
December 20, 2012Good article reassessmentKept
February 18, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 17, 2023, and September 17, 2024.
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:58, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article contains uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. The "Controversies" section has several problems: Its inclusion in the article may go against WP:POV, as the article is stating that these are controversies in wikivoice. The first part is mostly quotes, creating copyright concerns, the award controversy doesn't seem to be about him. I think this can either be removed or the information redistributed throughout the article. I think the "Comparisons with Gandhi" section is unnecessary in the article: why is Periyar being compared to this particular historical figure? This section also seems to be trying to elevate Preiyar's standing by comparing him to a favourable figure, which I do not think is the role of Wikipedia. If they cooperated together, that can be mentioned in the biography, but it doesn't need its own section. Z1720 (talk) 23:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Semi-protected edit request on 18 January 2026

[edit]

Remove the duplicate "Annai E. V. R. Maniammai" in the list of spouses in Periyar's infobox, particularly the one that has a supposed marriage year of 1948. (Request withdrawn, Lekeviree (talk) 06:46, 18 January 2026 (UTC)) Lekeviree (talk) 06:36, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Closing withdrawn request. Day Creature (talk) 07:01, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming of the Article

[edit]

The article should read E. V. Ramasamy as Periyar is a title given by his followers. By following a neutral POV, one must use the legal name and not a follower given title. "Periyar" means the Elder One, which is merely a title and not a name. TechyLox (talk) 19:13, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 27 May 2026

[edit]

Arun Dhamotharan (talk) 09:54, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Wikipedia is written by human beings (you're also going to want to discuss this first for a consensus anyway). –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 14:33, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]