Jump to content

Talk:Louvre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleLouvre was one of the Art and architecture good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day...Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 30, 2006Good article nomineeListed
September 19, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
May 8, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
May 7, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
May 26, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 29, 2008Good article nomineeListed
October 9, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
December 19, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 8, 2004, November 8, 2005, November 8, 2006, August 10, 2011, August 10, 2012, August 10, 2013, August 10, 2015, August 10, 2018, August 10, 2020, and August 10, 2023.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of July 4, 2006.
Current status: Delisted good article

No Logo?

[edit]

This is beyond my paltry abilities as a Wikipedian, but I think there should be a logo (preferably svg) in the sidebar just like there is for the Met, the Louvre, and other major museums. Mpaniello (talk) 20:14, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:09, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article has some wonderful prose. Unfortunately, it also has some uncited sections, including entire paragraphs. Some of the uncited text has been marked with "citation needed" since August 2020 and August 2022. While some citations were added earlier this year, there is still some work to be done. Hopefully, this GAR will bring additional editors who will help fill in the missing references needed. I also think the "21st-century" section needs a review to remove the non-notable information and merge the short paragraphs together: a subject-matter expert would be helpful here to evaluate the information for its notability. Z1720 (talk) 02:46, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 21st century section is very well cited, as is the entire page. Not only does this rate its 'good article' status, it should be promoted to a feature. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:53, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
there's still uncited text, and this should not be taken to FA status without it being fixed. 750h+ 15:45, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Renumbering of rooms

[edit]

Commons is the site where the 110 million photos used in the Wikipedia sites of the various languages ​​are hosted.
I created Commons:Category:Musée du Louvre by room name and Commons:Category:Musée du Louvre by room number to facilitate the search of rooms: by name or by number. Indeed, until now, one could only search for a room by its number within a department of the Louvre.--Tangopaso (talk) 16:21, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:22, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]