Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention
Appearance
(Redirected from Wikipedia:UFAA)
| UAA navigation: |
Usernames for administrator attention
This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.
- Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
- Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person.
- Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
- For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here.
- Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username}} or {{Uw-coi-username}} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
- Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously.
- Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports.
Note: Patrollers may wish to monitor usernames flagged by filters 54, 148 and 149; private filters 102, 354, 499, 579; and this recent changes filter tag.
This page was last updated at 02:47 on 29 June 2026 (UTC). if it is out of date.
| This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice will be automatically removed by HBC AIV helperbot14 (talk) when the backlog is cleared. |
- Icantthinkofausername12345 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "user ?name|policy|blacklist" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 20:00, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Note on file policy or username self-reference is often associated with abuse -- DQB (owner / report) 20:00, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
- Bobettelover6767 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "((6|six)[\s-]?(7|seven)){2" on the blacklist.} -- DQB (owner / report) 22:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Note on file 6-7 meme -- DQB (owner / report) 22:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
- Wikieuropaki (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "paki" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:40, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
- Nooneasirishasbarackobama (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:50, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
This username matched "clinton|hillary|hilary|trump|drumpf|biden|obama|kamala" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 13:50, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
Note on file possible reference to former or current U.S. president, VP, or candidate - please review -- DQB (owner / report) 13:50, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
- Architgupta.co (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:20, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:20, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
- 6767joshua (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "((6|six)[\s-]?(7|seven)){2" on the blacklist.} -- DQB (owner / report) 05:50, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
Note on file 6-7 meme -- DQB (owner / report) 05:50, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
- Ethicalsmell24 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:50, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
This username matched "Used 2 instead of s attempting to skip filter: smell(y|s). Violating string: ethicalsmells4" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:50, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
Note on file the word "smelly" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 22:50, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
- Noobultramax (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "noob" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 01:20, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
Note on file generally insulting Internet slang term -- DQB (owner / report) 01:20, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- Corporate2032 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "role account?" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:30, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 02:30, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- Officiallyhntai (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "official" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:50, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
Note on file Not of serious concern but may imply a position of authority or a role account -- DQB (owner / report) 04:50, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- Wnoobeditor (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "noob" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 06:00, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
Note on file generally insulting Internet slang term -- DQB (owner / report) 06:00, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- FilthyNingen (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "filth" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:30, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- Red killer 1p (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "killer" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:40, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- V Subramanya Founder of Teju Masala (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. -- Least Action (talk) 02:47, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 03:56, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- Editor of doom (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. MakaylaHippo1998 (talk) 08:37, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Not seeing how this is disruptive. 331dot (talk) 09:30, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- Tayas Contracting LLC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Promotional username. jolielover♥talk 14:05, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. So far, there is no link between the username and the user's edits. Let's try warning them and giving them a chance to change their username. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- PhysFinance2026 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) Promotional username. In solidarity Dafootballguy Want to talk? 20:47, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. For a username to be blatantly promotional, there must be a link between the username and the user's edits. Consider re-reporting if a connection becomes clear through the user's edits. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 23:52, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- Mughaldigitalmarketingglobal (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google · Spamcheck) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Theroadislong (talk) 22:23, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 23:52, 28 June 2026 (UTC)