Jump to content

User talk:Shakya2007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello! I am a human, so I make mistakes. If you feel that I'm mistaken, note them down so we can discuss it.

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Shakya2007, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Austronesier (talk) 19:50, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir for the suggestions. I totally appreciate the tips you gave me! Shakya2007 (talk) 19:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Compliment

[edit]

Thank you sir Shakya2007 (talk) 19:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

[edit]

Hi, I'm a Marxist-Leninist and Anti-revisionist. I have reversed your contribution to the Indian National Congress because it appears that it is not constructive. In the future, if you wish to modify or change your political stance on protected articles, please participate in the talk or provide a reliable source.Marxist-Leninist and Anti-revisionist (talk) 15:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

how do I provide a source? Shakya2007 (talk) 12:36, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indian National Congress

[edit]

Hi, I have reverted your valuable edits in Indian National Congress. Added references doesn't provide if party is centre-left. You can add it back once you find a reliable source. Happy editing. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 14:24, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kaliaganj Municipality moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Kaliaganj Municipality, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk) 11:18, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What source shall I include ? Shakya2007 (talk) 12:38, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 16:00, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information Shakya2007 (talk) 16:16, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Rajendra Prasad, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See MOS:DR. CodeTalker (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaliaganj (municipality) (January 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Shakya2007! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Left Alliance

[edit]

@Shakya2007 User Sharad SHRD7 is again started disruptions and he is trying to delete an article written by me : Alliances formed by left-wing parties in the states of India. Wikipedia reviewer Onel 2569 (I forgot the exact name) previously said me to add more citations to the page and I added that and then he said nothing against that page. Please say your opinion in that page. The page is being used in many other pages. XYZ 250706 (talk) 12:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion is that you have done nothing wrong and your page is factual. SHARAD is paranoid for sure. Shakya2007 (talk) 12:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please write your comment on the talk page of that article. XYZ 250706 (talk) 12:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did it. Now it's your turn to provide your defense regarding your article. And please inform other users like Chennai Super Kings lover etc. to come there as well. Shakya2007 (talk) 12:50, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And if @XYZ 250706 gets blocked for Wikipedia:Canvassing you may be blocked for suggesting it. Doug Weller talk 13:43, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, those users have already engaged with user SHARADSHRD7 so I just indirectly invited them. I have no intention of teaming up to bully one person. Shakya2007 (talk) 17:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 13:51, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for such incidents, if any. Shakya2007 (talk) 17:01, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kang Kek Iew, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alias. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2024

[edit]

@Shakya2007 National parties in India have some extra advantage over other parties. They can user their particular symbol all over India and the government provides land or a building for the National parties to erect their party headquarters. I think national parties in India can be regarded as major parties for Lok Sabha election. Besides if you look at the national parties, all parties (Except NPP) have national significance. Shouldn't we add them in the infobox for 2024 Lok Sabha election? XYZ 250706 (talk) 05:55, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Basavaraj Bommai, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. NiteshTALK 10:26, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaliaganj (municipality) (June 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Turnagra was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Several of the sources are either from the municipality's own website or are sources which discuss all municipalities in the region, neither of which are enough to establish the notability of the municipality. Try finding some independent, reliable sources to use as references before resubmitting.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Turnagra (talk) 23:13, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaliaganj (municipality) (December 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EmeraldRange was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Same issue as before. Sources should be independent and you need more than just routine coverage- so the election database and the additional government sources don't really help.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 19:18, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced claim

[edit]

Your recent edit(s) to YSR Telangana Party have been unsourced, and are thus unverifiable. Please rectify this error, otherwise the edit may be undone. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 06:41, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing out this error. I have added several sources now. Shakya2007 (talk) 06:59, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All good 👍 Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 07:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi Shakya2007! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 07:07, Thursday, January 4, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

January 2024

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Timo Werner, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Content needs a reliable source. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Simply confess that you are a bully. Shakya2007 (talk) 16:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

[edit]
You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kaliaganj (municipality)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Shakya2007. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kaliaganj (municipality), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indian military history case opened

[edit]

The Arbitration Committee has opened an arbitration case titled Indian military history in response to an arbitration enforcement referral. You are receiving this notice because you are a named party to the case and/or offered a statement in the referral proceedings.

Please add your evidence by June 5, 2025, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage.

For a guide to the arbitration process, please see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence phase of Indian military history extended by three days

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you are on the update list for Indian military history. Due to an influx of evidence submissions within 48 hours of the evidence phase closing, which may not allow sufficient time for others to provide supplementary/contextual evidence, the drafters are extending the evidence phase by three days, and will now close at 23:59, 8 June 2025 (UTC). The deadlines for the workshop and proposed decision phases will also be extended by three days to account for this additional time.

For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 03:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Draft:Kaliaganj (municipality)

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Draft:Kaliaganj (municipality)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 09:02, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming expiry of your ipblock-exempt right

[edit]

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your WP:IPBE right which gave you the ability to bypass IP address blocks will expire on 14:24, 22 December 2025 (UTC). If your IP is still blocked, please renew by following the instructions at the IPBE page; otherwise, you do not need to do anything. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 19:41, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kaliaganj (municipality)

[edit]

Hello, Shakya2007. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kaliaganj".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:26, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

April 2026

[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to set Preferences → Editing → Editor → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary). Thanks! Ekdalian (talk) 18:44, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Damn after 4500+ edits you all are finally saying I've hit unc status and need to act formal lol. Shakya2007 (talk) 18:46, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Be serious! Wikipedia is a collaborative project; as an experienced editor, you should be more careful in future! Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 18:51, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. Will keep it in mind from now on. Thanks for the advice! Shakya2007 (talk) 14:17, 23 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Soham Chakraborty when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 14:02, 23 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I understood. Thank you for pointing out my flaws! Shakya2007 (talk) 08:17, 24 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure why you're being so sarcastic... Just trying to help you learn. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 13:59, 24 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No, I am not being sarcastic. I indeed realised I made some mistakes and now look at my recent history, leaving edit summaries! Shakya2007 (talk) 14:02, 24 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ~2026-64188-8 (talk) 09:52, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kinda funny how you yourself are also at risk of getting blocked and now you really want a scapegoat along too. Shakya2007 (talk) 10:51, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I want you to stop this kind of behaviour. It's not a nice feeling for you to get blocked for any kind of personal attacks you make at any editors. Galaxybeing (talk) 11:05, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry no offense, but I feel I'm the one getting harrased. This is the first time in five years, that users along with admins are coming together to block my account. Is this the same Wikipedia created by Jimmy Wales? Seems unrecognisable. Shakya2007 (talk) 11:08, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You are not going to be blocked as long as you stop attacking other editors. WP:NPA applies to every editor, from Jimmy Wales to the newest editor. Black Kite (talk) 11:16, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I have to be very frank with you that you started the problem. Attacking other editors with your comments in edit summaries is a bad thing to do. Even trying to blame them makes things worse. I suggest it's time for you to cool down and refrain from doing all those kind of things that could get you blocked. Remember no personnel attacks. Galaxybeing (talk) 11:17, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I thank you for at least coming to terms. See in my previous conflict with User:Zackmann08, who is an admin, I already apologised to him because I found my mistakes. I'm a young editor, and so for me it's not a regular habit of edit clash. However, the user I am having beef with now, is also accused of edit wars in their own talk page, as well as disruptive editing (I take back the word "vandalism"). It is unfortunate that I'm put in a situation of becoming the sacrificial lamb, however you indeed have managed to make an impact though. Once again thanks. Shakya2007 (talk) 11:23, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Zackmann08 is not an administrator. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:05, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Raghav Chadha, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Calling other editors "idiots" or "twats" or claiming they are vandals or biased are personal attacks. Cease this immediately, please, or you will be blocked. Black Kite (talk) 10:20, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Does this refer me to keep quite and sit numb when others suggest me to "touch grass" and practise in edit wars for their own edit boosting? Shakya2007 (talk) 11:04, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No, it quite clearly tells you to stop attacking other editors, which is a Wikipedia policy. Black Kite (talk) 11:12, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'm eager to tender a direct apology to the user I had beef with if only the non-neutral edit in Raghav Chadha page is removed. It's not just me that reverted his edits. In fact, look at the history too. Some other users also found the edits non-neutral. And for the record, several ex-opposition leaders previously too criticised the BJP even harshly, but such info is at least not there in their lead section. So logically why Raghav should be an exception, particularly when he's under attack by "left-wing" groups? My offer is simple and I am prepared to apologise even 100 times, if the condition is met. Shakya2007 (talk) 11:17, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, the article is currently locked because of the large number of users edit-warring on it. I would suggest making your request on the talk page of the article to see if you can gain consensus for it. Black Kite (talk) 11:35, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
But aren't you an admin? Shakya2007 (talk) 11:36, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I am. But admins cannot take sides in a content dispute unless there is consensus amongst users, otherwise we would violate WP:INVOLVED. Black Kite (talk) 12:33, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Understood sir. I have to replied to you in the talk page of Raghav Chadha. Shakya2007 (talk) 12:36, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
In the interests of clarifying the situation; in this post of yours you said your incivility/personal attacks happened because of the actions of a temporary account. No, they didn't. They happened because you chose to violate our Wikipedia:No personal attacks and Wikipedia:Civility policies. There is no justification for breaching these policies. It doesn't matter what someone else does. It doesn't matter if people call you the most hateful things you could imagine, or do the most egregious things you could think of against the project. There is never a justification for violating these policies. You've been here more than four years. You should know better by now. No amount of insulting people will result in positive things nor convince people of the veracity of your position. Such insults are a direct reflection on you, rather than the people against whom you are attempting to level such insults. This is true in 'real world' life as much as it is here. This behavior of yours will stop. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:03, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I am afraid I do not see much latitude for change here, alas. Notice the latest post on their talk page: he is referring to those with whom he currently has disagreements as "communists", and stating they will not be able to "suppress" his "voice". I am not sure what they are alluding to, but expecting them to exercise civility is quite optimistic. ~2026-64188-8 (talk) 15:40, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Sure is and already stopped. However unfortunately the concerned user and some admins keep coming to critique, even though I'm trying to cool down. This is further complicating the situation. Shakya2007 (talk) 16:01, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Shakya2007

[edit]
Hello, Shakya2007. You have new messages at Shakya2007's talk page.
Message added 15:06, 27 April 2026 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hey, hold tight, God loves you, there's always light at the end of the tunnel. Shakya2007 (talk) 15:06, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pronouns

[edit]

Could you please not assume that everyone is male, addressing them by default as 'sir' and referring to them as 'him'? That is quite inconsiderate towards our many editors who are female, or non-binary, or otherwise not keen on such forms of address. (It is also somewhat lazy, when addressing an editor whose userpage clearly shows preferred pronouns as 'she/her', which you could have found out had you checked.) Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:00, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, should I use they/them? Shakya2007 (talk) 16:04, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
When dealing with an editor you're not familiar with, you could quickly check their userpage, and if their preferred pronouns are shown, and then try to remember to use those. If no preference is shown, you can either refer to them as 'them' (which is what I do), or you could perhaps ask them, especially if your interaction becomes more extended than just a few short comments.
Anyway, my point was don't assume, and don't just default to male. Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:29, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Understood, will stop being kinda lazy. Shakya2007 (talk) 16:32, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It's good to get into the habit of using they/them anyway, that's the standard these days! There's also a script you can install that reads editors declared gender and adds a little icon next to their name on their Talk page, I find it really helpful. I'll try to find a link if you like? Blue Sonnet (talk) 16:37, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Found it! User:PleaseStand/userinfo Blue Sonnet (talk) 16:39, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. ~2026-28954-01 (talk) 15:22, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You may be eligible to vote in the U4C election

[edit]

I am contacting you because you previously voted in elections related to the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C). You may be eligible to vote in the current U4C election, which is open now and closes on 2 June 2026. You can find out more about the candidates and the election on the election page on Meta, and from there you can access the vote itself. Your participation in these elections is important to the governance of Wikimedia communities, and your time spent learning about the candidates and voting is appreciated.

-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) (talk)

Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
This is for your contributions related to Kerala. Pachu Kannan (talk) 15:29, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
എനിക്ക് ആദ്യ Barnstar നല്കിയതിന് വളരെ നന്ദി! Shakya2007 (talk) 15:31, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Re Raghav Chadha

[edit]

The fictitious "consensus" you referred to in your edit summary while reverting the changes holds no merit whatsoever. On the contrary, plenty of differing opinion prevailed. I note you were previously embroiled in a conflict with fellow editors over this page too. The talk page discussed merely alluded to some kind of "hypocritical" depiction of circumstances even though Chadha's defection, more so in light of his remarks on the political outfit he now pledges allegiance, has been at the forefront of the whole fracas. Journalistic sources have dwelled upon that at length. You do not get to discount that. Furthermore, per WP:OWN, you do not "own" the page. If you think providing such context is "biased", I refer you to the pages of historical entities who committed a major volte-face by bartering one school of thought for another. Writing "Please, do not," is not only inappropriate, but contrary to the ethos of collaboration. Do not run with the notion you own the page and get to exercise authoritative say on what stays and what does not. HotChickenParmesan (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:42, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Neither I "own" the page, nor consensus is "fictional" or "hypocritical". Maybe there are historical entities with volte-face in leads however we have a "real" consensus. Shakya2007 (talk) 21:04, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You should consider reading properly before jumping to a response. I was referring to the fact that the false "consensus" on the page, "established" vastly between unregistered individual editing from temporary accounts, claimed the insertion of this critical info was "hypocritical". You should also refrain from editing that page until the time you explicitly declare your conflict of interest stemming from your political predisposition too, which you have yet to.
Lastly, do not use terms such as "do not". You do not own the page, and as much as you deny, that phrase makes it sound like you are deliberately trying to undermine Wikipedia:Ownership of content. HotChickenParmesan (talk) 01:29, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome to share your opinions in the talk page if you want. And yes, as a BJP supporter, I will keep patrolling the page. Shakya2007 (talk) 07:27, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Keep patrolling the page for all I care, but do not introduce your lopsided bias into the page. Cheerio. HotChickenParmesan (talk) 07:42, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
There's no bias, the info stays, but no in the lead, admins verified too. Furthermore, I checked Wiki:OWN and it accidentally matches my tone. Although completely unintentional, I do apologise. Shakya2007 (talk) 07:44, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
There's no such thing as "admin verification", if that's what you are talking about. Wikipedia works on establishing consensus, so convening a hasty group of random IPs to drum up support for an unpalatable fact, more so in light of your political disclosures, has no merit. Lastly, you don't get to solely determine what stays and where, so I would be careful if I were you. HotChickenParmesan (talk) 10:25, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
On second thoughts, the foregoing comment of mine might have been a wee harsh. No harm done, but you need to understand that the way you write might be taken the wrong way. All good here. HotChickenParmesan (talk) 10:54, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers mate everything is a learning experience in Wikipedia for me. Shakya2007 (talk) 13:23, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shakya2007&oldid=1359155562"