User talk:Bruhchamp21

August 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 03:09, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Cuauhtémoc Blanco

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cuauhtémoc Blanco, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:15, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Brad Evans (soccer), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 07:46, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jeppe Tverskov, you may be blocked from editing. Giant Snowman 14:39, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:WIKIPEDIAISNOTARELIABLESOURCE. Giant Snowman 14:44, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Marco Fabián. Giant Snowman 16:00, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Fabian is literally on the Empire_Strykers#Active players, he's a currently part of the team Bruhchamp21 (talk) 16:31, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been told, for the third time (1, 2) that Wikipedia is not a reliable source, i.e. Wikipedia articles/information cannot be used to support other edits. Giant Snowman 17:05, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bruhchamp21! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore your preferred version of an article. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Rafael Márquez is currently protected because of your actions and you continue edit-warring. If you continue with this edit-war, I'll have to take it with the moderators the next time.. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 17:38, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.(CC) Tbhotch^™ 00:52, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Blue Sonnet (talk) 04:42, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christian Pulisic. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Anwegmann (talk) 17:58, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman—Just putting this on your radar, given the number of warnings this user has received recently for similar edits. Anwegmann (talk) 17:59, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - when we exceed a final warning, I'll block. Giant Snowman 18:55, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bruhchamp21! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore your preferred version of Hugo Sánchez. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Hugo Sánchez, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Thank you. Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 19:29, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Guillermo Ochoa. You have already been warned several times and continue to edit war over unsourced or improperly sources edits. Anwegmann (talk) 17:56, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman—This editor has edit warred over improperly sourced edits on both Hugo Sanchez and Guillermo Ochoa. Anwegmann (talk) 17:57, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for repeated addition of unsourced content to BLPs, and edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Giant Snowman 09:25, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2026

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Mariluz Bermúdez, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 23:24, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just finding out that apparently Instagram is no longer reliable, so please stop threatening Bruhchamp21 (talk) 00:06, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Javier Hernández

Hi Bruhchamp21, Javier Hernández was not part of the final squad for either the 2011 or the 2013 Community Shield. The references you shared are incorrect. --Mauricio C. (talk) 00:29, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Players on the winning squad who aren't in the final match are considered part of the trophy win, all registered players, get championship recognition. Javier Hernández was still part of those seasons. Bruhchamp21 (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A clear example that it's not counted is Andrés Iniesta: UEFA doesn't include the 2009 European Super Cup for him because he wasn't part of the final squad/convocation. --Mauricio C. (talk) 18:56, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

May 2026

Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary or a comment that did not appear to be appropriate, civil, or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 19:59, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining your recent updates in the Interliga articles. I meant no harm, I was genuinely curious why those updates had been made but they make sense now. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 23:47, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

yeah no problem Bruhchamp21 (talk) 02:23, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, let me know if my most recent updates to Interliga 2005 makes sense. I still think we should include the two clubs that qualified to the Libertadores in the infobox. Curious on your thoughts. TY! Morogris (✉ • ✎) 00:37, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

yeah it actually does make sense, I agree to include them both under champions Bruhchamp21 (talk) 02:26, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Naming convention for two Mexican clubs

Hello. I'd like to invite you to contribute to a discussion around the naming conventions of "Pumas UNAM" and "Tigres UANL" in WP:FOOTBALL, see discussion here. Feel free to provide your thoughts if you'd like. Morogris (✉ • ✎) 23:34, 11 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]