This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wicked (2024 film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the film Wicked was dubbed by actresses who were part of the stage show in various countries returning to voice their characters?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ariana Grande, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ariana Grande on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ariana GrandeWikipedia:WikiProject Ariana GrandeTemplate:WikiProject Ariana GrandeAriana Grande
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
Wicked (2024 film) is part of WikiProject Musical Theatre, organized to improve and complete musical theatre articles and coverage on Wikipedia. You can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Musical TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject Musical TheatreTemplate:WikiProject Musical TheatreMusical Theatre
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oz, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OzWikipedia:WikiProject OzTemplate:WikiProject OzOz
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2024, when it received 10,123,320 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report8 times. The weeks in which this happened:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.
Does the reference to the lion cub need to be hyperlinked to the Cowardly Lion article? The film itself does not make it obvious that the lion cub is intended to be the Cowardly Lion, and this information is not necessary to understanding Wicked’s plot (WP:SPOILER). Linking the lion cub directly to the Cowardly Lion article may therefore go beyond what is supported on screen (WP:OVERLINK).
Similarly, in the Cast section, the sentence, "Additionally, the Cowardly Lion makes an appearance as a cub." appears interpretive rather than reflecting the film’s cast list; this differs from movies with named animal performers (e.g., Moonie the dog as Bruiser Woods in Legally Blonde).
The article became GA on December 3rd 2025, and looking at the version of the article linked in the milestone cell shows that the production section has pretty much remained the same with only a few changes in wording, spelling, sources, and few extra sentences in Filming. Because the production section hasn't been enlarged greatly since becoming GA I would say no to a split as well. Funnykoalavinecompilation (talk) 00:09, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
What is the main concern and the reason for the split question? The article is not too long. I didn't look at the history, but was the section added to after GA? Main concerns I have are: The article is GA. Removing parts that might have been there at the GA assessment might endanger the article to a reassessment. If that is a remote possibility, then No to a split. -- 01:04, 8 March 2026 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Otr500 (talk • contribs)
ALT3 sounds interesting to me, but other hooks also sound good. An image could be used if ALT1 is chosen. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 16:58, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
