Talk:Cyclone Fina

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 27 November 2025 by reviewer SnowyRiver28 (talk · contribs).

Weather: Tropical Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Northern Territory Low‑importance

	Australia portal Cyclone Fina is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Territory (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the Northern Territory Library.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Cyclone Fina Page Expandsion

It’s definitely gonna make landfall and this is the official article for the cyclone,so it kind of not too detailed and we will expand pretty soon,if you see this you can edit it based on real evidence. NoobbTr (talk) 03:58, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclone Fina is now reached it second peak ~2025-31142-29 (talk) 04:43, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

The meteorological history should not be a direct copy of the season article, and the last sentence about the category 4 upgrade is unsourced. I put in some sources in the comment I left that can be incorporated into the impacts section, since that's most of the reliable coverage we have so far. More coverage should start coming in soon, so it could be expanded. But it would be publishable if a) the meteorological history is rewritten/expanded so it's not a content fork and b) if those and/or other RS are added to expand the impacts section. Z E T A^C 15:25, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging main authors: @NoobbTr @SquishyWikii @Jiiiiiiiii @Owen is the best GG Z E T A^C 15:27, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll re-edit it soon Owen is the best GG (talk) 21:53, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments left by AfC reviewers

Comment: Just waiting for the target page Cyclone Fina to be deleted so I can accept this draft and move it there. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 06:08, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This is definitely notable now, but there is lots of coverage to expand the article with. Z E T A^C 13:35, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Still too early to move to mainspace - the article quality is a bit lacking and it's entirely the met hist, wait for some impacts to roll in before publishing. (would also like to see an expanded met hist instead of the limited version copied from the season article) Z E T A^C 20:09, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

Article merged. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 07:53, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Usually I wouldn’t propose a merge so quickly after the publication, but there hasn’t been any improvement whatsoever to the page and for the most part this can easily fit within the season summary. Additionally the storm made landfall in a sparsely populated area of Australia so impacts were bound to be minimal to none. MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 00:15, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support No major improvements to the article have been made (even per the suggestions I made above) and no coverage that has continued up to now, it was a flurry of coverage (when I made the AfC comment above) and then very little afterwards due to its remote landfall location. HurricaneZeta^C 00:22, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment We just need to wait for damage information in case if Darwin received some significant damage Owen is the best GG (talk) 03:01, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge per HurricaneZeta. RedAmi! (talk) 13:48, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I feel like it's too early to make the call. I am also seeing quite a bit of coverage on Fina still being published. I just feel like people aren't working on this article Lightbulb Noob (talk) 01:27, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! Oppose for now Owen is the best GG (talk) 01:53, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lightbulb Noob Which coverage? I'm not seeing any major coverage yet, it could be split back out in the future if more coverage occurs HurricaneZeta^C 14:36, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I stand corrected, most of the articles were small and practically useless and one was locked behind a paywall. Lightbulb Noob (talk) 16:38, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support I mean. Lightbulb Noob (talk) 16:38, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support – This material can easily fit within the season's storm summary subsection, and no additional extraordinary impacts or notable meteorological details have emerged post-storm.Drdpw (talk) 18:07, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support- Not much in met. history or impacts, easily fits in summary. Jiiiiiiiii (talk) 03:18, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want to just have this closed, with the article being merged. Jiiiiiiiii (talk) 00:05, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, its been over a week Lightbulb Noob (talk) 02:20, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hurricanehink Since you're not involved with this at all, do you mind closing this merge proposal since there is a consensus to merge and it has been over a week? RedAmi! (talk) 03:07, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Cyclone Fina active on November 21.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:51, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bad image for Wikipedia

The image of Fina on November 21 is taken from Zoom Earth, and that site has options to turn off borders and labels. This is not the best option, and should be replaced. CycloneTheta (talk) 01:08, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]