Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Playtex/1

Playtex

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Issues appear to have been addressed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:25, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Very little post-2015 information, even though the company has been active at that time. Z1720 (talk) 02:18, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for highlighting this need, as the article does appear set in time circa 2012-2015. I've begun updating the recent history and the lead section to reflect current day. There is still some effort to remove statements from 2012 that are presented as current day. I'll continue to chip away at this over the next few days. Matthew Yeager (talk) 06:41, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: I've updated the lead section, added to recent history, and removed dated information from the products section. I'd appreciate your review to help guide any further updates. Thanks! Matthew Yeager (talk) 19:10, 8 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Z1720: Please look at this article when you have a chance. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:50, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Matthew Yeager: Thanks for your work. I added two citation needed tags. Once resolved I think this is ready to keep. Z1720 (talk) 16:52, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: I've addressed those two problem areas by expanding the BPA-free history, and removing product lines without coverage. Ready for your review! Matthew Yeager (talk) 18:39, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Concerns resolved. Z1720 (talk) 18:41, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.