User talk:~2026-97963

January 2026

Hello, I'm Minna Sora no Shita. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Iris Murdoch—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. --みんな空の下 (トーク) 18:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment is inappropriate. Yoir edit was invlaid, and consequently as been reverted. Please take greater care in the future.

Hi ~2026-97963! I noticed that you've made several edits in order to restore your preferred version of Order of Nine Angles. The impulse to repeatedly undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure that you're aware of Wikipedia's edit warring policy. Repeatedly undoing the changes made by other users in a back-and-forth fashion like this is disallowed, even if you feel what you're doing is justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages in order to try to reach a consensus with the other editors involved. If you are unable to come to an agreement at Talk:Order of Nine Angles, please use one of the dispute resolution options that are available in order to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of repeatedly reverting other editors' changes can help you avoid getting drawn into edit wars. Diffs: Special:Diff/1332068986, Special:Diff/1332069463 and Special:Diff/1332078986.. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 19:54, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fiona Fullerton, you may be blocked from editing. Marincyclist (talk) 20:05, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. PARAKANYAA (talk) 04:06, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 20:04, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 20:14, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions to Iris Murdoch and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

You are welcome to edit without logging in; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages and upload media). An account also has more protection against revealing your IP address. If you edit without a username, a temporary account (~2026-97963) is used to identify you instead.

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! _signed,Kvinnen (talk) 18:51, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Kurt Weiland article

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Kurt Weiland. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 22:15, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]