Jump to content

User talk:Yorkwarmemorials

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Yorkwarmemorials, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 18:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: York and District Boy Scouts War Memorial (September 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Yorkwarmemorials! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:37, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acaster Malbis War Memorial (October 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I'm not convinced this meets the notability requirements; the only sources are a primary source and 3 links to the CWGC, which don't establish notability. Pretty much every single town and villiage in the UK has at least one WW1 memorial so it would need to be specifically notable in order to publish.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CoconutOctopus talk 11:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Castle Acre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St James. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dickleburgh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page King Charles II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:York and District Boy Scouts War Memorial

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Yorkwarmemorials. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:York and District Boy Scouts War Memorial, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rowntree's Factory War Memorial

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Yorkwarmemorials. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rowntree's Factory War Memorial, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:09, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Great Witchingham, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Count Eustace of Boulogne and King Henry I.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Holme Hale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Army Veterinary Corps.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lenwade

[edit]

Thanks for your edits on above article. I've noticed you deleted content without discussion. Please replace edits you removed especially about Lenwade's concrete industry. Thanks Northmetpit (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted the edits to go back to a version with this information included Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Acaster Malbis War Memorial

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Yorkwarmemorials. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Acaster Malbis War Memorial, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Acaster Malbis War Memorial

[edit]

Hello, Yorkwarmemorials. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Acaster Malbis War Memorial".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:26, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:York and District Boy Scouts War Memorial

[edit]

Hello, Yorkwarmemorials. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "York and District Boy Scouts War Memorial".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 13:26, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Using the MOS

[edit]

Hello. Please could you take a look at WP:MOS, in particular with relation to the use of sub=headings. Also take a look at WP:UKCITIES when you get a chance please. The addition of lists of names on war memorials would seem to not be notable per WP:NOT as well. I don't think they're necessary at all; please stop adding them Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:23, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure whether you've read this or not, so let me expand.
  • please stop adding war memorial tables to settlements. The level of detail you're adding is simply not notable. The existence of a war memorial is fine, particularly if it is listed; very brief details about how many people are listed on it or any significant events that are memorialised on it, yes, that's probably also notable. But every name is not notable. If you disagree, discuss it, but please stop adding this data
  • in the WP:MOS we specify that section headings use sentence case – see specifically MOS:HEAD. So it would be Notable people, not Notable People. Please stop capitalising. It increases work for other editors cleaning up your work
  • also per the MOS, we have decided over many years that we write either thirteenth century or 13th century, not Thirteenth Century – see specifically MOS:CENTURY. Again, it's taking work cleaning up the MOS issues you keep on introducing
  • WP:UKCITIES provides a structure for articles that we should follow and provides a range of advice and useful tips. In particular:
  • Notable people as a subheading, rather than Notable residents please
  • The order of sections – in particular Governance, but see below
  • Demographics – but see below
  • Landmarks
  • We don't always need short sections. Sometimes they can be combined or information included in the lead. There are times when you're duplicating information or splitting in to sections where it's unnecessary to do so
  • The Governance sections you're including are probably unnecessary, especially where they're simply copying data from the infobox. There needs to be sourcing. I'd also very strongly suggest not including the name of the current MP or their party. These things change and you can bet that no one will come along when there's a new election to change the data
  • You're linking to North Norfolk rather than to North Norfolk (UK Parliament constituency)
All of this adds to the work of other editors, correcting MOS issues, removing non-notable content and dealing with errors. Please make sure you've read the links I've provided. If you have any questions or disagree with me, now's the chance to discuss this
One last suggestions. Read Wormshill. That's bee a featured article since 2008. When I'm in any doubt about what to do in a village article it's where I check Blue Square Thing (talk) 10:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Terlincthun British Cemetery has been accepted

[edit]
Terlincthun British Cemetery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Passengerpigeon (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yorkwarmemorials&oldid=1322797203"