Jump to content

User talk:Wobbanight

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Wobbanight, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tropical fish of the Eastern Pacific, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mccapra (talk) 07:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tropical fish of the Eastern Pacific

[edit]
Notice

The article Tropical fish of the Eastern Pacific has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Recent AfDs establish that user-generated scopes such as “Eastern Pacific” are not a basis for articles.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 07:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Creatures of The eastern Pacific

[edit]

It's now at List of fish of the eastern Pacific. Your title was undefined as to what creatures means. It could have included animals from folklore that cryptozoology claim live, it could include birds that fly over the ocean. Also there is no reason to capitalise Creatures or The. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 17:56, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Creatures of Connecticut Waters

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Creatures of Connecticut Waters, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Just a random Wikipedian(talk) 12:29, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of fish of the eastern Pacific

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wobbanight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of fish of the eastern Pacific, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of aquatic fauna of Connecticut

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wobbanight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of aquatic fauna of Connecticut, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Haven Savings Bank Tower moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to New Haven Savings Bank Tower. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:17, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Haven Savings Bank Tower (December 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 21:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Wobbanight! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 21:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fresno Nightcrawler

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fresno Nightcrawler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[1]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fermiboson (talk) 16:26, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

[edit]
Stop icon

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Fermiboson (talk) 16:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of aquatic fauna of Connecticut

[edit]

Hello, Wobbanight. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of aquatic fauna of Connecticut".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:56, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:New Haven Savings Bank Tower

[edit]

Hello, Wobbanight. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "New Haven Savings Bank Tower".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

US President & Vice President

[edit]

Howdy. Please wait until Trump & Vance actually take office, which isn't until Noon EST. GoodDay (talk) 14:38, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thought it was fine due to it happening in 2 hours. Wobbanight (talk) 14:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tallest Casino In Each State Of The United States has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tallest Casino In Each State Of The United States. Thanks! 331dot (talk) 14:19, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tallest buildings in New England

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wobbanight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tallest buildings in New England, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:08, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tallest Casino In Each State Of The United States

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wobbanight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tallest Casino In Each State Of The United States, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of tallest buildings in Stamford (August 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 13:11, 3 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to List of tallest buildings in New Haven. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 01:23, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mindhack (video game)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wobbanight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mindhack (video game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:29, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:New Haven skyscrapers

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:New Haven skyscrapers, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:00, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One Century Tower moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to One Century Tower. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:44, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: One Century Tower (September 15)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JuniperChill was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
JuniperChill (talk) 19:43, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tallest buildings in New England

[edit]

Hello, Wobbanight. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Tallest buildings in New England".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, keep up the great work!

[edit]

It's great to have someone like you contribute to Wikimedia Commons. I've edited the tallest building pages for a few American cities as a non-American person so there's no way for me to snap a pic of missing photos for some of these buildings. LivinAWestLife (talk) 15:06, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) Wobbanight (talk) 01:19, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of One Financial Plaza (Hartford, Connecticut)

[edit]

Hello Wobbanight,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged One Financial Plaza (Hartford, Connecticut) for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want One Financial Plaza (Hartford, Connecticut) to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

C F A 16:13, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of tallest buildings in Lanzhou has been accepted

[edit]
List of tallest buildings in Lanzhou, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Patre23 (talk) 14:50, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of tallest buildings in Bridgeport has been accepted

[edit]
List of tallest buildings in Bridgeport, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 14:43, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Skyscrapers/Tallest building lists has an RfC

[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Skyscrapers/Tallest building lists has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.LivinAWestLife (talk) 16:48, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Pinnacle at Nashville Yards (November 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
not clear how being the 4th tallest building in Nashville confers any notability?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:14, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinnacle Tower (November 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jcgaylor was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jcgaylor (talk) 23:55, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthaus (Philadelphia) (November 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
No evidence of notability per WP:NBUILD / WP:GNG.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:33, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mutual of America Building (December 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Smallangryplanet was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
If you can find some sources that aren't user-generated content or the building itself, I think it's notable enough.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Smallangryplanet (talk) 12:59, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of tallest buildings in Clayton, Missouri (December 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheInevitables was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs to show evidence of meeting WP:NLIST.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TheInevitables (talk) 20:56, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Skyscrapers discord server

[edit]

Hi, hope your day's going well! Would you be interested in joining a discord server about skyscrapers? We have channels for casual skyscraper talk, architecture, new developments, planning, photos, off-topic discussion, and more. It's also easier to talk about Wikipedia editing there. Here's the invite link: https://discord.gg/nkP5tJNFFT LivinAWestLife (talk) 20:43, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of tallest buildings in Charleston, West Virginia for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Charleston, West Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Charleston, West Virginia (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:09, 20 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of tallest buildings in Bridgeport for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Bridgeport is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Bridgeport until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:16, 21 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Wobbanight. Thank you for your work on Huntington Square. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:NBUILDING. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 10:18, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of tallest buildings in Preoria

[edit]

Hello Wobbanight,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of tallest buildings in Preoria for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want List of tallest buildings in Preoria to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

I2Overcome talk 00:58, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Go right ahead Wobbanight (talk) 01:01, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Associated Bank Plaza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreground. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of tallest buildings designed by Foster + Partners for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings designed by Foster + Partners is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings designed by Foster + Partners until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 12:14, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of tallest buildings in Cedar Rapids

[edit]

I think List of tallest buildings in Cedar Rapids is FLable. Would you at some point be interested in taking it back to FL? I'd be willing to implement the comments from the FL and serve as a co-nominator Olliefant (she/her) 02:19, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

sure Wobbanight (talk) 03:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The Original Barnstar
message LivinAWestLife (talk) 19:11, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!! Wobbanight (talk) 19:13, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

February 2026

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Louisiana Tower (Shreveport, Louisiana) when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 04:27, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:One Century Tower

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wobbanight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:One Century Tower, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:08, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of tallest buildings in Roanoke

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wobbanight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of tallest buildings in Roanoke, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Listing for discussion of Template:List of tallest buildings by architect

[edit]

Template:List of tallest buildings by architect has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bsherr (talk) 03:41, 11 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pinnacle Tower

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wobbanight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pinnacle Tower, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 12 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of tallest buildings in the United States built in each year from 1900 to Present day

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wobbanight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of tallest buildings in the United States built in each year from 1900 to Present day, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Plaza in Clayton Residential Tower

[edit]
Notice

The article The Plaza in Clayton Residential Tower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBUILD, all listed refs redirects to skyscraper-center website.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on Talk:The Plaza in Clayton Residential Towerthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

✓ortexPhantom (talk) 09:56, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is notice with revised comment on concern:
== Proposed deletion of The Plaza in Clayton Residential Tower ==
Notice

The article The Plaza in Clayton Residential Tower has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBUILD, almost all refs redirect to skyscraper center website, cannot find multiple reliable sources which provides in-depth coverage.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on Talk:The Plaza in Clayton Residential Towerthe article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. ✓ortexPhantom (talk) 10:01, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of tallest buildings in Roanoke

[edit]

Hello, Wobbanight. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of tallest buildings in Roanoke".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:25, 2 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

What is the tallest building in Asheville?

[edit]

I found a source saying it was The Arras, and I happened to look at the article last week and saw the changes. I guess my source was wrong and I'm not sure what to do.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:05, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

At this point, I have checked Emporis and it states the courthouse is 11 feet shorter. I don't know what changed but there are other changes that would have to be made. I'm going to stand by Emporis and my other source until we figure this thing out.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:01, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Both SkyscraperPage, The CVU, and SKYDB both state that the courthouse stands 230 ft (70 m) tall. Measuring from the lowest building entrance in Google Earth which is on Davidson Dr, proves all of those sources correct.[1][2][3] Wobbanight (talk) 23:23, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose we can go by that, but that changes a number of things.
I don't recall the Asheville Citizen-Times ever making a correction, so we have to find a way to deal with this on The Arras. — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:21, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'm on my way to verify what was said about The Arras. One of my sources failed verification so I don't know where I got it, but I have to find a new source. In the meantime, look at [2] and [3].— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:34, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I found what I needed and changed the diffs to reflect that. I've seen this way of handling the situation when sources conflict. When the headline in a source says the building is the tallest, then that creates a problem.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:06, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Buncombe County Courthouse - The Skyscraper Center". The Skyscraper Center.
  2. ^ "Buncombe County Courthouse - SKYDB". SKYDB.
  3. ^ "Buncombe County Courthouse - SkyscraperPage". SkyscraperPage.

Your draft article, Draft:List of tallest buildings in the United States built in each year from 1900 to Present day

[edit]

Hello, Wobbanight. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "List of tallest buildings in the United States built in each year from 1900 to Present day".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:27, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mutual of America Building

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wobbanight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mutual of America Building, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:11, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Louisiana Tower (Shreveport, Louisiana) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louisiana Tower (Shreveport, Louisiana) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louisiana Tower (Shreveport, Louisiana) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

* Pppery * it has begun... 05:54, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

px sizes

[edit]

Please don't remove px sizes from images like here. It forces browsers to download the full size images which may have been dozens of megabytes in total here, and some users see the full size images depending on circumstances. For example, this may (I'm not sure) show you the full sizes I saw. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:56, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I had the same issue; the images displayed extremely large on my monitor (until fixed by the other editor). Most likely a mistake I'm guessing but just something to be aware of. Electricmemory (talk) In solidarity 23:54, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Plaza in Clayton

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Wobbanight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Plaza in Clayton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:08, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wobbanight&oldid=1357632495"