User talk:The BO77!

Welcome!

Hello, The BO77!!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, — 🪫Volatile ^{📲T | ⌨️C} 06:45, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just wanted to point out that we usually don't link to common words or phrases. If you would like more information, Wikipedia has a manual of style that may be of interest. Happy editing! — 🪫Volatile ^{📲T | ⌨️C} 06:46, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Volatile, thank you so much! Understood!

Best Regards The BO77! (talk) 09:22, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi The BO77!. Thank you for your work on Norwegian County Road 615. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ Contact me! 01:22, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Jeremy Randell Go

Hello The BO77!, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jeremy Randell Go, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 06:21, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, This article fails WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV. It lacks significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Most of the references are social media links or promotional material, not encyclopedic content.The BO77! (talk) 06:23, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You tagged the article for speedy deletion under WP:A1 which is for article that have insufficient context to identify the subject of the article. The subject of the article is pretty clear so it fails to meet A1. The fact that you are now indicating it does not meet notability indicates that you do not understand what speedy deletion is used for. It applies only for those pages which meet a specific speedy deletion criteria. If it doesn't and you think it should be deleted, you need to nominate for deletion. See Wikipedia:Deletion policy for more information about the various ways deletion can be done. -- Whpq (talk) 06:31, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou! @Whpq The BO77! (talk) 06:33, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

About Moving

Draft:Mandan Vastukaar

I have changed it according to Wikipedia's rules. If you still think it's correct, please move it from draft to mainspace. दीपसिंह 09:45, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done! I have rewritten the article with improvements and moved it to the main space. However, some citation tags are available so try to finding sources and adding WP:SIGCOV references where needed. The BO77! (talk) 09:57, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks sir दीपसिंह 10:15, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mandan Vastukaar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mandan Vastukaar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GoldRomean (talk) 15:45, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC reviewing

Please stop reviewing AfC submissions without being a reviewer; I suggest applying for permissions here. Also, the draft you "accepted" above was very promotional and needs more work; I have draftified it for the time being. GoldRomean (talk) 15:45, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, don't do things like this again, which was unncessary, clogged up the page history, and gives the impression of WP:GAMING for WP:XC. GoldRomean (talk) 15:48, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou! Sir The BO77! (talk) 15:50, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined

I notice that you tagged the page Kidnapped in a Small Town for speedy deletion with the reason "G3 Vandalism". While that's a valid reason for speedy deletion in general, this page does not qualify for speedy deletion under that criterion because it is not clear that this article is vandalism. If you still want the page to be deleted, please consider tagging it with a speedy deletion template which does apply, redirecting it to another page, proposing the page for deletion if it appears to be an uncontroversial matter, or taking the page to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for a wider discussion. Thanks! Stifle (talk) 08:19, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Communal Riot

I have redirected this to communal violence - I don't think we need a separate page at that title. I would recommend, given the other comments above, that you go through the articles for creation process to make new articles rather than creating them directly, at least until you get a bit more experience. Andrew Gray (talk) 11:10, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm had a look at some of your other creations and I'm confused by Category:Fair use tag needs updating - according to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 April 14#Category:Fair use tag needs updating this was deleted four years ago and was linked to a template tag that isn't used any more.

I don't understand why you recreated it, or why you added a lot of what looks like LLM-generated instructions, especially as you have never edited any files. Andrew Gray (talk) 11:20, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sir! @Andrew Gray,

I apologize for my mistake about Category:Fair use tag needs updating. I was exploring maintenance categories and mistakenly believed this one still had relevance without checking its deletion history. I now understand it was previously deleted. I didn’t use AI but I did try to understand how similar categories work by referring to related ones. I copied some structural elements from other maintenance categories just to learn. 🌟 𝒯𝐻𝐸 𝐵𝒪𝒮𝒮! 11:29, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shakti Singh (politician)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shakti Singh (politician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakti Singh (politician). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mccapra (talk) 22:06, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Poplar Row for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poplar Row is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poplar Row until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:18, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shevanti Mangeshkar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shevanti Mangeshkar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:10, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Houston Curry moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Robert Houston Curry. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:28, 10 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Siberian Exile in Tsarist Russia moved to draft

As you have not replied to my concerns on the talk page of this article, I have moved it to draft space. It is not suitable for mainspace in its current condition, where at least two of the references appear to be inaccurate. PamD 08:19, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2025

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Venice by Moonlight. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 06:47, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou!🌟 𝒯𝐻𝐸 𝐵𝒪𝒮𝒮! 06:49, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Fram. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Fram (talk) 12:14, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rangasthalam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amit Sharma. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Ritu Maheshwari (IAS).jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Ritu Maheshwari (IAS).jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding National Boyfriend Day

Hello @The BO77! I am a new page reviewer. I have reviewed your stub, National Boyfriend Day! It looks fine and is referenced adequately. It is currently an orphan so adding some links from other places would be a good idea. I would also recommend expanding the article with some information on its history if you can! Thank you and happy editing! 11WB (talk) 10:55, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@11wallisb Thank you for reviewing and I will update them and you can also check and suggest edit of my other creations like The Filmy Charcha, List of most-viewed Instagram reels, and Mohana Rao Patibandla and many others. 🌟 𝒯𝐻𝐸 𝐵𝒪𝒮𝒮! 11:15, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not normally supposed to review articles through requests from talk pages, though some reviewers do. I will on this occasion as the three you linked are stubs. I'll review them and get back to you. 11WB (talk) 11:19, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These stubs appear relatively straightforward. I would be careful relying too heavily on The Times of India as a source, is it not considered reputable for fact-checking. According to WP:TIMESOFINDIA, they have also used paid advertorials, which violates WP:NPOV. Apparently, they have also published at least one LLM-generated article. For these reasons, I personally wouldn't class TOI as a reliable source. Both The Filmy Charcha and Mohana Rao Patibandla should be resourced based on this.

List of most-viewed Instagram reels is mostly fine, however a more substantial lead paragraph may be in order. I have done the bare minimum for the removal of the editor tag however.

Thank you for not using AI to generate these stubs, as this has become a big problem on Wikipedia and other sites lately. Happy editing! 11WB (talk) 11:30, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@11wallisb, Thanks for your feedback! I'll make sure to use reliable sources and can you please suggest? I'm a little bit confused about this article Draft:Venice by Moonlight Actually, the admin leave a note that the sources don’t fully support the main claim and suggested expanding the discussion on the talk page.🌟 𝒯𝐻𝐸 𝐵𝒪𝒮𝒮! 11:55, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this message from Fram for the information you are looking for! For a more comprehensive guide as to which sources are reliable and which are not, I recommend viewing WP:RS/PS! Happy editing! 11WB (talk) 12:30, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Suicide of Ayesha Banu Makrani

Hello The BO77!, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Suicide of Ayesha Banu Makrani, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicide of Ayesha Banu Makrani.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dionysodorus}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dionysodorus (talk) 10:47, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Raghubar Dayal moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Raghubar Dayal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and contains non-existent references. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dionysodorus (talk) 15:28, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peleta (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peleta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:50, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The BO77!! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:50, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Peleta

The page Peleta has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:53, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Polpoda stipulacea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adamson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi The BO77!. Thank you for your work on Amalie Døvle. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work about on this article. Please add more secondary sources and coverage to establish WP:Note. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 12:17, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi The BO77!. Thank you for your work on Karl Anker Jørgensen. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more secondary sources to establish notability per WP:Prof. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:57, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Verhuellia hydrocotylifolia

Hello, The BO77!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Verhuellia hydrocotylifolia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:09, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:AMD CDNA Architecture

Hello, The BO77!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:AMD CDNA Architecture, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Köln-Bonner Eisenbahnen

Hello, The BO77!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Köln-Bonner Eisenbahnen, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:09, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Levoni Taranto

Hello, The BO77!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Levoni Taranto, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:07, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tales from the East

Hello, The BO77!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tales from the East, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:11, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kesar Singh (film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kesar Singh (film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Not WP:NFILM yet. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaCore talk 20:19, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@The BO77! Hey,

I see that you moved the draft back to mainspace, however, the article still not meets the notability for film WP:NFF. AlphaCore talk 11:32, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kesar Singh (film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kesar Singh (film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaCore talk 18:09, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

January 2026

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kesar Singh (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not move the draft back to mainspace without addressing its concerns or sublit via AFC. The film article needs to satisfy WP:NFILM or WP:NFF AlphaCore talk 18:12, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Picture of a Nymph

Hello, The BO77!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Picture of a Nymph, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Siberian Exile in Tsarist Russia

Hello, The BO77!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siberian Exile in Tsarist Russia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nehal Dutta

Hello, The BO77!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nehal Dutta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:09, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Robert Houston Curry

Hello, The BO77!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert Houston Curry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:AMD CDNA Architecture

Hello, The BO77!. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "AMD CDNA Architecture".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:03, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Köln-Bonner Eisenbahnen

Hello, The BO77!. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Köln-Bonner Eisenbahnen".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 12:24, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Filmy Charcha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Filmy Charcha, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Filmy Charcha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mikkhail Vaswani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mikkhail Vaswani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mikkhail Vaswani (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Zuck28 (talk) 09:17, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mayur Maheshwari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mayur Maheshwari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayur Maheshwari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Zuck28 (talk) 16:25, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Picture of a Nymph

Hello, The BO77!. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Picture of a Nymph".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:06, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Siberian Exile in Tsarist Russia

Hello, The BO77!. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Siberian Exile in Tsarist Russia".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 08:25, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Venice by Moonlight

Hello, The BO77!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Venice by Moonlight, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:09, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nehal Dutta

Hello, The BO77!. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nehal Dutta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:22, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Robert Houston Curry

Hello, The BO77!. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Robert Houston Curry".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:26, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Kesar Singh (film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kesar Singh (film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because Not meeting WP:NFF. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AlphaCore talk 08:31, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kesar Singh (film) (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nighfidelity was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kesar Singh (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nighfidelity (talk) 15:35, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Raghubar Dayal

Hello, The BO77!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Raghubar Dayal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Peleta

Hello, The BO77!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peleta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:09, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vishv Umiya Foundation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vishv Umiya Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishv Umiya Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Zuck28 (talk) 13:09, 5 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mayur Maheshwari for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mayur Maheshwari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayur Maheshwari (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Owen× ☎ 16:06, 9 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Venice by Moonlight

Hello, The BO77!. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Venice by Moonlight".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 03:26, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pericalina

Hello, The BO77!. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Pericalina".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 04:25, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kesar Singh (film) (March 13)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, ThatTrainGuy1945, left the following feedback:

The subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion.

Not notable yet. Please stop putting this in the queue. It's annoying.

Next steps

If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

🚂ThatTrainGuy1945 ^{Peep peep!} 15:35, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vishv Umiyadham for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vishv Umiyadham is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vishv Umiyadham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Zuck28 (talk) 18:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zundel Cation

Hello, The BO77!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zundel Cation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Raghubar Dayal

Hello, The BO77!. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Raghubar Dayal".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:25, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi The BO77!. Thank you for your work on Palacio de Orellana. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources and establish notability as per WP:NGEO. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 06:23, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Mariamnei, I just updated the page and added more reliable independent sources to better support notability in line with WP:NGEO. 🌟 𝒯𝐻𝐸 𝐵𝒪𝒮𝒮! 07:54, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Amalie Døvle

Hello, The BO77!. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amalie Døvle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of National Young Authors' Fair

The article National Young Authors' Fair has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lack of non-primary sources, many sources are paid for by the company running this event, and thus does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines due to limited external reporting.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 24 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of National Young Authors' Fair for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Young Authors' Fair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Young Authors' Fair until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

EndTheWikiEditor (talk) 21:33, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hong Kong Asian Film Festival

The article Hong Kong Asian Film Festival has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NEVENT. Article is WP:REFBOMBED by dead links. My WP:BEFORE yielded no helpful results. Passed old PROD review under the same criterion.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. 「NuggFrog」 (talk) 12:47, 8 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hong Kong Asian Film Festival

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hong Kong Asian Film Festival requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SatnaamIN (talk) 04:22, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amalie Døvle

Hello, The BO77!. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Amalie Døvle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:28, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Copernicus Society of America for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Copernicus Society of America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copernicus Society of America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Andrew Gray (talk) 21:45, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed in the AfD discussion that you replied a couple days before the deletion was closed. If you do find sources to establish notability you can ask for the old article to be restored as a draft by posting at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. If you find sources but are unsure of whether they demonstrate notability (for this article or any other), you can always ask at WP:Teahouse or the HELP:DESK. Good luck, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 04:40, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Arun Kar

Hello, The BO77!,

Thank you for creating Arun Kar.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Majority of the sources are PR.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|GrabUp}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GrabUp - Talk 07:42, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi The BO77!. Thank you for your work on Pietracuta. Another editor, Ingratis, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for this stub. It could be improved by the addition of information from the it-Wiki article, but only if it were possible to locate additional sources to back up that information, as the Italian article is very poorly sourced.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

(If this article is ever challenged on the basis that this is too small a settlement to warrant its own article, it could easily be redirected to San Leo). Best wishes,

Ingratis (talk) 05:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Open Network for Digital Commerce, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Porter and Ola were added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Magicpin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Magicpin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

Epsilon.Prota ^talk 11:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi The BO77!. Thank you for your work on Jayant Banerji. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lucknow Falcons for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucknow Falcons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucknow Falcons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Vestrian24Bio 14:03, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

June 2026

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Gabriele Henkel. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see MOS:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is just an example that I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using. Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:33, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Xerocrassa turolensis

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Xerocrassa turolensis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use placeholder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
- MolluscaBase eds. (2022). "Xerocrassa turolensis (Ortiz de Zárate López, 1963)". World Register of Marine Species. MolluscaBase. Retrieved 2022-08-13. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:26, 27 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]