User talk:HonestManBad

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HonestManBad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

See the "Blocked" section Retardednamingpolicy (talk) 23:18, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You didn't address any issues, you reacted with increasing levels of hostility. Wording an insult as "a statement about your own sensibilities" is not an excuse. Otherwise any personal attack could be made policy-compliant by prefixing it with "I think...". Regarding the username, you can request a change of username yourself via Special:GlobalRenameRequest, but I have doubts the new name is much better. Huon (talk) 23:43, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

HonestManBad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

If disagreeing with an admin is considered "increasing levels of hostility", then I am willing to abide by that rule as well. I just really want this whole thing to be over with. Please accept my humble apologies: everything I said is wrong, and everything Edgar181 and Huon said is right. I made the name change request via the provided link, but they said it was inappropriate and that I should make a new name change request in my unblock request, so here it is: I want my new name to be "HonestManBad". Retardednamingpolicy (talk) 13:56, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Renamed and unblocked, welcome back. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:33, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shut up your mouth — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.176.28.198 (talk) 9 April 2017

No. Retardednamingpolicy (talk) 01:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Username

I realize you've been here for a few years, and the name was a bit less offensive at the time, but "retarded" is increasingly viewed as a slur, and I think it might run afoul of the naming policy. For my part, I was hesitant to address you by name in the discussion over at Talk:Carl Benjamin because I don't really want to use the term. I'm not sure what the response would be at Wikipedia:Usernames_for_administrator_attention, but I think changing it would be a good idea regardless of the rules because it seems likely to offend a fair number of Wikipedia editors. Would you consider changing it? Thanks Nblund^talk 21:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind that it's offensive but I kinda hate it anyway. I'll probably change it once the discussion over there dies down. Retardednamingpolicy (talk) 21:57, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker)Just a heads up that requests for username change has died down if you'd like a rename A 10 fireplane ^{Imform me} 16:08, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I mean the ongoing discussion on Carl Benjamin. Retardednamingpolicy (talk) 17:14, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your username as it is clearly violates the username policy. Could you please go ahead and request the username change ASAP? ceranthor 15:33, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do it in my own time. Find something better to busy yourself with. Retardednamingpolicy (talk) 15:41, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that many would find your username offensive, I would ask you to request a username change within the next few days, or I will start a discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names. Thanks. ceranthor 16:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Because the inappropriate username and the personal attacks in response to polite requests regarding changing it, I have blocked this account from editing. You'll have to address these concerns if you wish to be unblocked. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:55, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong on both counts. It was a demand that I change my username sooner than I otherwise would have of my own volition. I made a statement about me, specifically about my own sensibilities, not a statement about him, thus not a personal attack. However, now that I know Wikipedia is more sensitive than a fractured dick, I will change my conduct accordingly. My desired new username is Fatty McFatStacks. If you wanna make a name change request for me immediately and thus cause unnecessary confusion in the ongoing discussion I have on another page, go right ahead. Otherwise I'll wait a bit. Retardednamingpolicy (talk) 20:20, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks for totally sabotaging my ability to contribute to that ongoing discussion. This is a clear abuse of power, as I addressed the issues you raised and you didn't bother replying at all, so I hope you feel good about that. Anyway, I'll have that name change now if you please, to "Fatty McFatstacks". Use an underscore if space is not possible. Or a dot. Retardednamingpolicy (talk) 23:17, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Patient Zero. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Skald in Veum—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Patient Zero^talk 22:49, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cool power move. I went ahead and undid your reversion since you did not state a reason and I stated two. If you want to discuss this, do so at the appropriate talk page instead of abusing the vandalism template. HonestManBad (talk) 23:35, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken a closer look, and you're right. My apologies. I see that you have already reverted my mistake so all is well there. I can assure you that this wasn't an attempt at a "power move" on my part, though. Patient Zero^talk 23:40, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, no worries. HonestManBad (talk) 23:59, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I vote for Elon Musk to buy Wikipedia and clear out all you mendacious r******, then buy whatever corporations you work at and clear you out from there as well, and then finally buy all your homes and clear you out. HonestManBad (talk) 00:59, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2026

Please stop. If you continue to insert fringe or undue weight content into articles, as you did at Books of Samuel, you may be blocked from editing. Articles on Wikipedia do not give fringe material equal weight to majority viewpoints; content in articles is given representation in proportion to their prominence. tgeorgescu (talk) 18:30, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

What the fuck are you talking about? Clown. If I could be arsed to find the correct template, I'd leave a warning on your page to stop beclowning yourself on other people's user pages. HonestManBad (talk) 20:08, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know exactly what you think you were doing when you made up those lies about my edit history. Were you actually just hallucinating? Or were you looking for random strangers to harass for the fun of it? HonestManBad (talk) 21:19, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. tgeorgescu (talk) 20:33, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked, again

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page. Giant Snowman 21:10, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I react poorly to petty power abuse such as yours. Why don't you address what tgeorgescu is doing here. HonestManBad (talk) 21:21, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I answered at [1]. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:19, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There's layers to your insanity. You don't even revert the edit. You wave around threats of blocking as a FIRST resort, against someone who has edited the page ONCE. You look at an edit which could have come from anyone who's read any of the most popular translations of the most prominent books of all time and saw a glaring contradiction, and you imagine some bizarre hidden agenda. You run and cry to the jannies when your bullshit is called out.

I'm sure you'll face no repercussions for any of this. (Personal attack removed) HonestManBad (talk) 06:20, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The first rule of jannies is, you do not talk shit about jannies.

The second rule of jannies is, you DO NOT talk shit about jannies.

It's hard to imagine a more contemptible crowd, or a more misaligned set of egos. HonestManBad (talk) 18:47, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It might or might not be hard to imagine, but it's certainly going to be hard for you to comment further here, as your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked. If you come to understand how your conduct here (and not just your recent conduct) was an issue and wish to appeal your block, you can do so via WP:UTRS. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:51, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]