User talk:No more horses
Welcome!
[edit]
Hello, No more horses, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Chris ☁️(talk - contribs) 02:09, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
Replaceable non-free use File:Dumplington site.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Dumplington site.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:10, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:TC exhibition model.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:TC exhibition model.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:54, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Trafford sept 96 JP.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Trafford sept 96 JP.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:55, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:TC aerial summer 1997.jpg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:TC aerial summer 1997.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:56, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Trafford festival village.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Trafford festival village.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:57, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
December 2025
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Trafford Centre, without citing a valid reason. Midlandsbuses (talk) 13:54, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
- The reason was valid. The Trafford Centre and Trafford Palazzo are now separate shoping centres. Trafford Palazzo has it's own article.
- The photo of the car in it's present location does not belong on this article and the caption claiming that it is situlated at 'The Trafford Centre' is factually incorrect. No more horses (talk) 14:06, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
- Well regardless of that please leave it where it is. Thanks Midlandsbuses (talk) 14:25, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
- I do not understand why to think that is not a valid reason? You could just put it on the correct article? No more horses (talk) 14:29, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
- Well, I guess you could move it to the appropriate page? If you feel so strongly
- Midlandsbuses (talk) 14:34, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
- I have no issue doing that No more horses (talk) 14:38, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
- I do not understand why to think that is not a valid reason? You could just put it on the correct article? No more horses (talk) 14:29, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
- Well regardless of that please leave it where it is. Thanks Midlandsbuses (talk) 14:25, 22 December 2025 (UTC)