Jump to content

User talk:Astra Travasso

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:J4joeyrod)

February 2026

[edit source]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Thomas Jones (missionary) when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 14:47, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Green reviewing drive

[edit source]

Hello Astra Travasso:

This month, February 2026, WikiProject Women in Green is participating in the February 2026 GAN Backlog Drive, in which we're aiming to review as many outstanding Good Article (GA) nominations about women and women's works as possible. If you want to help out, you can check out the project talk page for a list of nominations in need of review (including some WiG originals). If you haven't reviewed a GA nomination before, be sure to check out the reviewing instructions and guidelines and feel free to ask for a mentor to check your work.

We are also working together with a wikithon hosted on 5 February by Wikimedia UK, which will focus on writing and improving articles about women involved in sustainable development. If you want to join the event, feel free to sign up at the eventbrite page; or if you would be interested in providing a 20-minute assessment and/or a full GA review of the submitted articles in the weeks following, put your name down on the project talk page for updates as the event progresses.

We hope to see you there!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

[edit source]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Baron Clarke, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andover was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

[edit source]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gudrun Dahl, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enskede was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 23:55, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - March 2026

[edit source]
Women in Red | March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Those experiencing difficulties with new articles can follow the guidance in our essays,
    perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:27, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

About Draft:Gina Moseley

[edit source]

Hi, @Astra Travasso, I have added the citation that you have asked for, and also significantly changed the draft with better citations. Could you please look into the draft again? Also please suggest any updates. Zirbenschnaps (talk) 18:14, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red – April 2026

[edit source]
Women in Red | April 2026, Vol 12, Issue 4, Nos 358, 359, 367, 368, 369


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, take a moment to ensure any notable woman is redlinked.
    Someone might be inspired to create an article for her.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:13, 29 March 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors/Membership/News/2025 Annual Report

[edit source]
Guild of Copy Editors Annual Report
Our 2025 Annual Report is now ready for review.

Highlights:

  • Introduction
  • Membership news and election results
  • Summary of Drives, Blitzes and the Requests page
  • Closing words
– Your Guild coordinators
To stop receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:J4joeyrod and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

About Draft:Gina Moseley

[edit source]

Hi, @Astra Travasso, thank you very much for your attention. I have seen that, you have moved the article back to the draft space. I only moved the article to the main space. But I did't review it. It was reviewed by User:Kj cheetham. I have got the notification 3 days ago, that they reviewed the article. Please guide me, what to do next? Zirbenschnaps (talk) 20:45, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. @Astra Travasso. Very sorry messaging you again. Could you please revisit the draft? And make suggestions? I have submitted it for review. Hope this works now. Zirbenschnaps (talk) 06:54, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi both, to clarify, I reviewed it as part of New Page Patrol WP:NPP on the assumption it had already gone through AfC and they were a full professor. I had not realised that Zirbenschnaps bypassed the AfC process by moving it to mainspace themselves. Notability might warrant a bit more careful checking against WP:NPROF. Zirbenschnaps, please be aware it can sometimes take a number of weeks for an article to be reviewed at AfC as there is quite a large backlog and they are not reviewed in any particular order. -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Zirbenschnaps please could I double check your connection to Gina Moseley - is it someone you know personally, or are you receiving any kind of payment for your edits to that article? -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:29, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Kj cheetham, I am the person writing about myself. And I have published the matter on my userpage. I hope this is allowed?Zirbenschnaps (talk) 13:58, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clarifying. I did note your declared a COI on your userpage, I was primarily checking if it was paid editing or not. It's allowed, but discouraged; take a look at WP:AUTOBIO. My recommendation is that when/if it gets accepted by AfC and published to mainspace, try to only propose changes on the talk page using the template outlined at WP:COIEDIT, rather than editing the article itself directly. Hope this helps. -Kj cheetham (talk) 14:32, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors – April 2026 Newsletter

[edit source]
Guild of Copy Editors – April 2026 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the April 2026 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since December. We extend a warm welcome to all of our new members. We wish you all happy copy-editing.

Election results: In our December 2025 coordinator election, incumbents Dhtwiki, GoldRomean, Miniapolis, and Mox Eden were reelected coordinators, and Wikieditor662 was newly elected coordinator, to serve through 30 June. Nominations for our mid-year Election of Coordinators will open on 1 June (UTC).

December 2025 Blitz: 16 of the 31 editors who signed up for the December 2025 Copy Editing Blitz edited 116,064 words in 47 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

January Drive: 35 of the 55 editors who signed up for the January Backlog Elimination Drive edited 498,397 words in 183 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

February Blitz: 19 of the 23 editors who signed up for the February Copy Editing Blitz edited 83,969 words in 43 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

March Drive: 28 of the 48 editors who signed up for the March Backlog Elimination Drive edited 210,064 words in 87 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

April Blitz: Sign up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, which runs from 12 to 18 April. Barnstars will be awarded here.

Progress report: As of 09:10, 10 April 2026 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 81 copyediting requests since 1 January 2026. The backlog of articles needing copyediting stands at 1,794 articles.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, GoldRomean, Miniapolis, Mox Eden and Wikieditor662.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:28, 10 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Destubathon of the Americas

[edit source]

You are invited to participate in the Destubathon of the Americas, a contest/editathon which will run from May 1 to May 31. The goal is to destub as many of our 475,000+ stubs for the Americas (from Alaska down to Chile) as possible. A good chance to have fun in expanding many of our old stale stubs and win up to £2000 ($2680) in Amazon vouchers for expanding stub articles. Sign up in the Contestants/participants section on the contest page if interested. Even if not interested in prizes you are still warmly welcome to participate in it as an editathon! Hopefully we can achieve something significant in the month of May together! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:41, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red – May 2026

[edit source]
Women in Red | May 2026, Vol 12, Issue 5, Nos 358, 359, 370, 371, 372


Online events:

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Struggling to find scientific works to write about? Start with review articles or textbooks,
    which may highlight influential studies, theories or methods by women.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk 04:43, 30 April 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Maria Holl (therapist)

[edit source]

Information icon Hello, Astra Travasso. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maria Holl (therapist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 4 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nandita Haksar moved to draftspace

[edit source]

Thanks for your contributions to Nandita Haksar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and wikipedia is not a resume. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 04:39, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Flyingphoenixchips. The moving into draft space of this article is not in line with Wikipedia:DRAFTNO. If you think the article needed more sources to establish notability, you could have done it yourself. I understand that wikipedia is not a resume, and the easy way to fix it would have been to keep her best sellers in the list of works, and deleted the rest. I do not understand the need to shift to draft for that reason. You could have also left behind a template tag on the article for "reads like a resume" (which exists). I do not seem the need to establish the notability of this author. Please consider checking the guidelines for the same. Sincerely, Astra Travasso (talk) 07:25, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @Astra Travasso as I said below, apologies on this mishap. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 07:26, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Moved back to mainspace. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:26, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Flyingphoenixchips and @MPGuy2824. I really appreciate it. Astra Travasso (talk) 07:30, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Naga People's Movement for Human Rights moved to draftspace

[edit source]

Thanks for your contributions to Naga People's Movement for Human Rights. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and there are copyright issues. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 04:41, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Flyingphoenixchips for your interest in this article, and dedication in expanding Wikipedia articles, especially from underrepresented areas. I sincerely appreciate it. However, I do not think you can move this page to draft space, as per WP:DRAFTNO. And now, I have created a mess which I cannot undo. As far as notability is concerned, how many sources do you think you need to establish notability given that the organisation is mentioned in newspapers, international reports, peer-reviewed articles, and academic book chapters. Can you further clarify this? As far as the copyright issues tag is concerned, I have tried to fix it but the link mentioned is a dead link. Therefore, I have refrained from removing it for the last few days. Is there a better solution to this problem.
Dear @MPGuy2824, could you fix the mistake that I did with moving this draft into a Wikipedia project instead of article as you did with at least one of the articles that was recently moved by the above user. Your help will be much appreciated.
Sincerely, Astra Travasso (talk) 07:21, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hey apologies @Astra Travasso, I was working with a few shell scripts on my terminal and it messed up tags as opposed to draftify. It has been moved back to mainspace. Apologies on my behalf Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 07:23, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Astra TravassoI am a northeastern myself and know that this organisation is clearly notable. Just would need to add more recent sources and fix the copyright issue. I will be looking into this to help out as well. Also why was the page moved from draft to wikipedia? Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 07:24, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The move was the mess on my side. As far as recent sources is concerned, I am afraid there won't be much. The organisation does organise annual events but as far as works for larger impacts are concerned, there are almost defunct. Astra Travasso (talk) 07:28, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I will try finding a few. I suspect there should be Ao naga sources out there. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 07:29, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Moved back to mainspace. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:26, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Flyingphoenixchips and @MPGuy2824. I really appreciate it. Astra Travasso (talk) 07:30, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for youǃ

[edit source]
The Naga Star
Hey @Astra Travasso thanks for the amazing work you have put into Nagaland related articles. Based on your user page I assume you are not from India? Well I just want to say that it means a lot to us editors who have roots in Northeast India....ǃ and just a simple thanks is definitely not enough. Keep up the amazing work. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 15:34, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This in indeed a great honour for my humble contributions towards populating Nagaland-related pages. One sentence at time! Thanks for the recognition @Flyingphoenixchips! I shall hold this dear to my work. Astra Travasso (talk) 05:01, 9 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mair Garnon

[edit source]

Hi - I'm an experienced editor. I came across this biography which you declined to create today, and I'm a bit baffled about how an inexperienced editor is supposed to respond to such a vague rejection. The draft includes several examples of significant coverage which easily pass WP:GNG in my opinion, and, per WP:AFCPURPOSE, it would credibly survive a deletion nomination. For example:

I admit I'm not experienced with AfC, having never used the process for my own pages. Could you explain why this page was rejected, and how a new editor could be expected to improve it without more specific guidance? pburka (talk) 22:33, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Pburka. Thank you for giving me an opportunity to reflect deeper on my actions, and justify them in some ways. I agree that I should have been clearer in my reasoning to decline the submission rather than just mention the lack of notability. There was already a comment with pointed to unclear Wikipedia:GNG which I seemed to agree with. Nevertheless, I also agree that it would clearly survive a deletion nomination but after slight improvements post-nomination.
  • The BBC obituary is definitely the strongest citation, but I missed it being used in the lede to point that she was "the leader of the 'Noson Lawen' programme". I previously saw it only being used for early biographical details. That was clearly my shortcoming. If the obituary would have been in English, I would have improved it myself which I often do.
  • The very short article on being the first woman compere spends equal text on the previous compere (who also did not have a Wikipedia page in English or Welsh). Therefore, I did not consider it to warrant sigcov. I could not find a Wikipedia page for Gwyl Fawr Aberteifi on Welsh Wikipedia. Collectively, these led me to wonder the significance of it.
  • While the prize established in her honour might be significant, I could not find any other mention of the prize in the following years. So, I assumed many prizes are instituted but their significance is established in the continuity of the same.
I admire your dedication and experience in Wikipedia, and Women in Red in specific. Therefore, if you think that the page is ready to be accepted, please re-submit. I will gladly approve it. My apologies for all the stress I may have caused. Sincerely, Astra Travasso (talk) 09:10, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I do think the page is ready, so I clicked the submit button. I appreciate the work that you do as a reviewer. I do feel that you're being unnecessarily strict in your interpretation of notability. In my opinion, new pages don't need to be perfect to be accepted; they just need to demonstrate that the subject is probably notable. The sources above might not be the strongest possible, but they do meet the requirement of significant coverage (i.e. not passing mentions). Remember that most users of AfC are relatively new to Wikipedia, and I'm sure the AfC review process must feel kafkaesque to many. We don't want to discourage editors who are legitimately following our written guidelines by applying stricter standards than what's documented. There's always time to improve articles after they're accepted. pburka (talk) 20:53, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you on most of your statements. Therefore, I feel approving the page is the right thing to do. Sincerely, Astra Travasso (talk) 21:44, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hinduism in Nagaland for deletion

[edit source]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hinduism in Nagaland, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hinduism in Nagaland (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - June 2026

[edit source]
Women in Red | June 2026, Vol 12, Issue 6, Nos 358, 359, 373, 374, 375


Online events:

Announcements, tips, participation...

Announcements from other communities:

Tip of the month:

  • Consider contributing to two of our monthly events at once, and improve coverage
    of LGBTQ+ women by de-orphaning their articles.

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:49, 25 May 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Draft:Binaifer Nowrojee

[edit source]

Hi Astra Travasso, thanks for reviewing Draft:Binaifer Nowrojee and leaving your comment. I've made some minor cleanups based on your feedback (tense in the lead, category formatting, section heading). I'm new to this, but learning! Would you be able to take another look when you have a chance? Thanks! WorldHistory391 (talk) 19:58, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I will take a look and make changes that are required. If there is something I think you must add, I will inform you about the same. Cheers, Astra Travasso (talk) 20:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors – June 2026 Newsletter

[edit source]
Guild of Copy Editors June 2026 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the June 2026 newsletter, a quarterly-ish digest of Guild activities since April.

Election news: Nominations for the mid-year coordinator election ends at 23:59 on 15 June. Voting will last from 00:00 on 16 June to 23:59 on 30 June. Results will be announced on the election page.

April Blitz: 18 of the 21 editors who signed up for the April 2026 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited 122,993 words in 56 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

May Drive: 34 of the 66 editors who signed up for the May 2026 Backlog Elimination Drive copy edited 543,972 words in 211 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

June Blitz: Our June 2026 Copy Editing Blitz will start on 14 June and finish on 30 June. Barnstars awarded will be posted here.

Progress report: As of 22:40, 11 June 2025 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 132 requests since 1 January, and the backlog stands at 1,691 articles.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:57, 11 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

[edit source]
The Hornbill Barnstar
Thank you for all the work you have put into improving Northeast India related articles. I created this barnstar and wanted you to be the first one to be facilitated with it. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 04:49, 26 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]


What an honour this is just when I have slipped into making minor edits rather than significant ones! I am humbled by your gesture, but motivated to revisit some of the pages that had my attention some time back. Thanks. PS. It is indeed a beautiful barnstar that you have designed. I like the small details that make it complete. Astra Travasso (talk) 19:16, 26 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Astra_Travasso&oldid=1361258697"