User talk:Hotgas

September 2025

Hello, I'm Pro-anti-air. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dance in Thailand without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --pro-anti-air (talk) 19:44, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

first thing first this topic was about the thai-dance not the cambodian dance history, so the contents must talking about the thai mainly not the cambodian dance history, i re-edited it bc it was very out of context, if yoy want to see the cambodian dance then go to the cambodian dance's page Hotgas (talk) 19:55, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the topic is 'Connections Between Thai Classical Dance and Neighboring Countries.' MoonsMoon (talk) 04:39, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

สวัสดีครับ คนไทยใช่ไหมครับ คุณกำลังโดนคนที่ชื่อ มูนมูน แก้ไขข้อมูลอยู่เหมือนผมไหมนะ 555 Realsource 1991 (talk) 03:03, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Hotgas Realsource 1991 (talk) 03:03, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The topic is 'Connections Between Thai Classical Dance and Neighboring Countries

The topic is 'Connections Between Thai Classical Dance and Neighboring Countries.' The content thus focuses on connections between Thai dance and neighboring countries, not "Cambodian dance history." Is there something specific you don't think fits? We can talk about it. But continuing to remove legitimate, well-sourced and supported, relevant content can be considered vandalism by Wikipedia. MoonsMoon (talk) 20:13, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. MoonsMoon (talk) 04:18, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Traditional Thai clothing. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You keep adding the same content to Traditional Thai clothing despite this being reverted by multiple users. The content has basic formatting errors and is partially unsourced. Please stop adding this content to the article in the same format. If you have well-sourced, well-formatted information that is WP:DUE for inclusion, then of course you can add that. Thanks NicheSports (talk) 19:01, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Traditional Thai clothing. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. You have reverted the same edit 4 times. There is a discussion open on the article talk page - can you please join? NicheSports (talk) 15:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hey @Hotgas, you really need to stop reverting this content while users are discussing on the article talk page. Honestly, the only WP:RS that anyone has provided there does seem to fit your perspective. But we 1) need more sources 2) your edits have grammatical and formatting issues. Let's find 1-2 additional reliable sources, share them on the talk page, get consensus, and then we can go ahead and add the content back to the article with proper spelling/formatting. Thanks! NicheSports (talk) 15:20, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Issue with content/edits? We can discuss!

Both myself and new user 36.37.219.63 submitted relevant, well-sourced content to 'Dance in Thailand' that you've deleted without explanation. What you're doing though can lead to another Edit War or be considered disruptive.

Some content you deleted was first discussed on the article's Talk page. You can add your reply or simply start your own topic on the Talk page if there's an edit or section with which you have an issue. MoonsMoon (talk) 01:14, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hotgas please to come to talk to discuss the reasons for reverting well-cited content. What you are doing is wp:disruptive, and if it continues, you could be blocked from editing. Xan747 (talk) 02:14, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:49, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Northern Moonlight 00:44, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dance in Thailand have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dance in Thailand was changed by Hotgas (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857404 on 2025-11-04T02:06:48+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Due to your persistent edit warring, I have indefinitely blocked you from editing Dance in Thailand. You are also warned to refrain from editing warring or any other type of disruptive editing at Traditional Thai clothing. Please read the Guide to appealing blocks. Cullen328 (talk) 04:03, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Steamed curry

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Steamed curry, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:02, 7 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

March 2026

Hello, I'm Bloomingbyungchan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Steamed curry have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Bloomingbyungchan (talk) 13:40, 8 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. MoonsMoon (talk) 20:31, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Traditional Thai clothing for a period of indefinitely for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 03:50, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

why did you block me??? so you agree with this khmer nationlist??? Hotgas (talk) 05:06, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

and in case as you know, this person has tried to change the origin of chongaben, but it fine dude, bc in your heart everything was came from cambodia, cambodia is the origin of the world Hotgas (talk) 07:57, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You can appeal the block to an uninvolved admin by posting "{{unblock|reason = your reason here}} " on this page. Include the curly brackets, replace "your reason here" with the actual reason you think you should be unblocked, and publish the page. Please stop putting appeals on other pages, it's pointless! Bishonen | tålk 10:33, 28 March 2026 (UTC).[reply]

"unblock me from editing| i got refs for the contents "

as you can see i got refs that said that chongaben itself(not thai chongaben) was originated from dhoti of india not cambodia in this articale https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Traditional_Thai_clothing#Chong_kraben i can show you the refs i got if you pls 🙏🙏🙏 Hotgas (talk) 10:48, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming that that was your unblock request, I have put it into the template for you below. Bishonen | tålk 14:53, 29 March 2026 (UTC).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hotgas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

as you can see i got refs that said that chongaben itself(not thai chongaben) was originated from dhoti of india not cambodia in this articale https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Traditional_Thai_clothing#Chong_kraben i can show you the refs i got if you pls 🙏🙏🙏 Hotgas

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for the block, edit warring. The merits of your edits are not the issue; every edit warrior thinks that their edits are correct. How will you resolve this dispute without edit warring? 331dot (talk) 15:44, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.