Jump to content

User talk:GoldenBootWizard276

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur Owen (1647–1702) has been accepted

[edit]
Arthur Owen (1647–1702), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CoconutOctopus talk 17:56, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wirriot Owen has been accepted

[edit]
Wirriot Owen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CoconutOctopus talk 17:57, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Mansel (1678–1706) has been accepted

[edit]
Thomas Mansel (1678–1706), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

nil nz 00:49, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:2005 Metra Rock Island derailment has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2005 Metra Rock Island derailment. Thanks! Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:37, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2005 Metra Rock Island derailment has been accepted

[edit]
2005 Metra Rock Island derailment, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 19:12, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Tarlby, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Charles Mason (1661–1739) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

toby (t)(c)(rw) 19:32, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John Laugharne

[edit]

On 28 May 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Laugharne, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John Laugharne suddenly died the night after his re-election in 1715? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Laugharne. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John Laugharne), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Dan arndt, left the following feedback:
This draft lacks inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. We require inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.

You must place an inline citation directly after:

  • quotations;
  • any material whose verifiability is likely to be challenged or is contentious;
  • any material about living people.

Please edit your draft to support your statements with inline citations. Learn how to create inline citations in the:

As per WP:ANYBIO, requires multiple sources/references.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Charles Mason (politician) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Dan arndt (talk) 04:48, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, GoldenBootWizard276! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:48, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lewis Pryse has been accepted

[edit]
Lewis Pryse, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 11:14, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Mason (politician) has been accepted

[edit]
Charles Mason (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 13:14, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
List of rail accidents in South Korea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ScalarFactor (talk) 20:18, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jagpal Singh Khangura (May 30)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Thilsebatti, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Jagpal Singh Khangura to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Thilsebatti (talk) 12:53, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeffrey Jeffreys has been accepted

[edit]
Jeffrey Jeffreys, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Agent 007 (talk) 20:02, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Squire has been accepted

[edit]
Robert Squire, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zzz plant (talk) 15:56, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Brewer (1654–1724) has been accepted

[edit]
John Brewer (1654–1724), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 16:36, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Sharp (1678–1727) has been accepted

[edit]
John Sharp (1678–1727), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 19:26, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, JohnLaurens333, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:John Digby (1668–1728) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

🏳️‍🌈JohnLaurens333 (They/them • Ping me!) 21:55, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello GoldenBootWizard276! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Encyclopedic tone, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Digby (1668–1728) has been accepted

[edit]
John Digby (1668–1728), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ChrysGalley (talk) 19:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Maister (June 3)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Ortizesp, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Needs more article about subject to pass GNG

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:William Maister to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Ortizesp (talk) 17:27, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Mompesson has been accepted

[edit]
Charles Mompesson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SafariScribeEdits! Talk! 17:59, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Gauntlett has been accepted

[edit]
John Gauntlett, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SafariScribeEdits! Talk! 18:00, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Moyser has been accepted

[edit]
John Moyser, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 18:31, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wharton Dunch has been accepted

[edit]
Wharton Dunch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 18:37, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Kynaston has been accepted

[edit]
John Kynaston, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 15:51, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Acton Baldwyn has been accepted

[edit]
Acton Baldwyn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 15:58, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Bkissin, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Suicide of Nautica Malone to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Bkissin (talk) 17:01, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Whitmore (died 1725) has been accepted

[edit]
William Whitmore (died 1725), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 17:08, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Plumptre (1679–1751) has been accepted

[edit]
John Plumptre (1679–1751), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 17:26, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@GoldenBootWizard276 Just FYI, I think this one was a duplicate of John Plumptre (elder) - I've merged the one detail not on that page and redirected it to the older page. Thanks for working on all of these. Andrew Gray (talk) 21:10, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathaniel Palmer (died 1718) has been accepted

[edit]
Nathaniel Palmer (died 1718), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 17:42, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Trotman (1650–1720) has been accepted

[edit]
Samuel Trotman (1650–1720), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zzz plant (talk) 18:05, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Foxton (MP) has been accepted

[edit]
John Foxton (MP), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 18:28, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Lloyd (died 1734) has been accepted

[edit]
Robert Lloyd (died 1734), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Agent 007 (talk) 18:41, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Maister has been accepted

[edit]
William Maister, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 19:20, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Lloyd (1657–1709) has been accepted

[edit]
Robert Lloyd (1657–1709), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Epsilon.Prota talk 16:50, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugh Aston (fl. 1390) has been accepted

[edit]
Hugh Aston (fl. 1390), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zzz plant (talk) 14:04, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: St Helena Hospice has been accepted

[edit]
St Helena Hospice, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zzz plant (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Macdona rail disaster has been accepted

[edit]
Macdona rail disaster, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zzz plant (talk) 14:55, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Bkissin, left the following feedback:
This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.
  • Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
  • Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.
Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Walter Aston (14th-century MP) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Bkissin (talk) 16:23, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Aston (14th-century MP) has been accepted

[edit]
Walter Aston (14th-century MP), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

In solidarity, nil nz 03:26, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Dikov (June 8)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Grapesurgeon, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Ivan Dikov to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

grapesurgeon (talk) 07:19, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Lond has been accepted

[edit]
Thomas Lond, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 14:47, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Meverel has been accepted

[edit]
John Meverel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 21:59, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GoldenBootWizard276. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dennis Graham".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 19:26, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Axi has been accepted

[edit]
Robert Axi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

{{GearsDatapacks|talk|contribs|in solidarity}} 15:33, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alan Ayot has been accepted

[edit]
Alan Ayot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 15:35, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Kela has been accepted

[edit]
Robert Kela, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 18:00, 11 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suicide of Peter Lynch (June 12)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, MarcGarver, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
See WP:BIO1E. I am not seeing anything that indicates notability in the Wikipedia sense.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Suicide of Peter Lynch to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

MarcGarver (talk) 15:29, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

June 2026

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Draft:Suicide of Peter Lynch has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. The4lines |||| (talk) 16:08, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@The4lines: Sorry. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 17:00, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Quarame has been accepted

[edit]
John Quarame, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 18:20, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swaithe Main Colliery disaster has been accepted

[edit]
Swaithe Main Colliery disaster, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zzz plant (talk) 20:03, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Annie Jane has been accepted

[edit]
Annie Jane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 22:04, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Very interesting article, thanks for creating. Lynch44 22:05, 12 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Yerde has been accepted

[edit]
William Yerde, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 11:25, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Zouche (died 1445) has been accepted

[edit]
John Zouche (died 1445), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lynch44 12:13, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Suicide of Gabriel Taye (June 13)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, SomeoneDreaming, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the event meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for events. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the event in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • show lasting significance: analysis published after the initial breaking news has passed, showing historical impact;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the event, such as press releases, the event or organizers own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all four of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
Lasting significance is unclear. Additionally, the lead should be rewritten--from the article and sources, it seems whether the death was caused by bullying is disputed.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Suicide of Gabriel Taye to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

SomeoneDreaming (talk) 16:34, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ivan Dikov has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ivan Dikov. Thanks! CopyleftEverything (talk) 18:43, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivan Dikov has been accepted

[edit]
Ivan Dikov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CopyleftEverything (talk) 18:51, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Heard (June 15)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Hurricane Wind and Fire, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for creative professionals. The draft requires:

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

It is often easier to prove the notability of a creative work than of a person. If the person is not yet notable, but their work has received multiple in-depth professional reviews, consider writing about the work instead.
Reference 1 and 2 do not provide significant coverage and please provide a page number for Reference 3, it is a 1,477 page book so such identification is needed.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Joseph Heard to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 00:46, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Heard has been accepted

[edit]
Joseph Heard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 02:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nazi feminism has been accepted

[edit]
Nazi feminism, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Future articles

Next steps

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire, why did you decline my draft? (talk) (contribs)🔥 23:05, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2005 Metra Rock Island derailment

[edit]

On 24 June 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2005 Metra Rock Island derailment, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a derailment in 2005 was caused by a train attempting to travel a 10 mph (16 km/h) crossing at 69 mph (111 km/h)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2005 Metra Rock Island derailment. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 2005 Metra Rock Island derailment), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Cielquiparle (talk) 00:03, 24 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]