User talk:Domin8r12

Speedy deletion nomination of √0

Hello Domin8r12,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged √0 for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want √0 to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 23:44, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Young-hoon

Hello Domin8r12,

I undid your edits on Kim Young-hoon as you got the actor and the high IQ person mixed up.

You may double check to be sure before editing. Nintendoswitchfan (talk) 01:17, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Domin8r12 (talk) 12:30, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Huge Chaves" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Huge Chaves has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 16 § Huge Chaves until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 21:13, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Effrey jepstein" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Effrey jepstein has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 July 23 § Effrey jepstein until a consensus is reached. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 06:42, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Rock isambiguation)

A tag has been placed on The Rock isambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. EatingCarBatteries _{(contributions, talk)} 18:05, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hey there

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Oreocooke (talk) 20:35, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(by the way, the pages created from those moves have since been deleted) Oreocooke (talk) 20:36, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Domin8r12 (talk) 02:34, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Jesse we need to cook" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Jesse we need to cook has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 10 § Jesse we need to cook until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:46, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Eastonmd" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Eastonmd has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 17 § Eastonmd until a consensus is reached. Left guide (talk) 08:06, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Skibidi senator" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Skibidi senator has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 26 § Skibidi senator until a consensus is reached. ‮qq77 💬 18:23, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Umbrella ammendment

A tag has been placed on Umbrella ammendment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I am bad at usernames (talk · contribs) 18:25, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Thank you ammednment

Hello Domin8r12,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Thank you ammednment for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Thank you ammednment to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 17:41, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Thank you amendment" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Thank you amendment has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 4 § Thank you amendment until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 19:46, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 0.6 compromise

A tag has been placed on 0.6 compromise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CabinetCavers (talk) 14:12, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Freedom amendment

A tag has been placed on Freedom amendment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:15, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Freedoms amendment

A tag has been placed on Freedoms amendment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:15, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Freedom amendments

A tag has been placed on Freedom amendments requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:16, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Freedom ammendment

A tag has been placed on Freedom ammendment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:16, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Freedoms ammendment

A tag has been placed on Freedoms ammendment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:16, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Freedom ammendments

A tag has been placed on Freedom ammendments requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:16, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Umbrella amendment

A tag has been placed on Umbrella amendment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:17, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1O Downing Street

A tag has been placed on 1O Downing Street requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:17, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Davey pageviews

A tag has been placed on Davey pageviews requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:50, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Youtube candidate" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Youtube candidate has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 22 § Youtube candidate until a consensus is reached. Casablanca 🪨^(T) 17:59, 22 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wye Island moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Wye Island. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Zzz plant (talk) 03:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Domin8r12 (talk) 03:24, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BaAar Oktar

Hello Domin8r12,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged BaAar Oktar for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want BaAar Oktar to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

aaronneallucas (talk) 01:37, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

"BaAar Oktar" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect BaAar Oktar has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 4 § BaAar Oktar until a consensus is reached. ~2025-31245-28 (talk) 03:04, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

"Moangahela" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Moangahela has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 12 § Moangahela until a consensus is reached. KyleSirTalksAlot (talk) 14:20, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

"Jared Schlatt" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Jared Schlatt has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 30 § Jared Schlatt until a consensus is reached. ConeKota (talk) 19:06, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Domin8r12. Thank you for your work on 100.9% classic country. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

this isn't mentioned in the target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:31, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

"Trump–Zelenskyy" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Trump–Zelenskyy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 April 19 § Trump–Zelenskyy until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 11:10, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

"300m tower" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 300m tower has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 23 § 300m tower until a consensus is reached. A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]