User talk:Dog Ocean Country Man

Welcome!

Hello, Dog Ocean Country Man, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Help is available: check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask your mentor via your user homepage, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:44, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cold Lake, Alberta, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aboriginal was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

March 2026

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Blood Telegram: Nixon, Kissinger, and a Forgotten Genocide have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 03:11, 7 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Just popping in this thread to say I reverted a similar edit to Sonic Sovereignty. The commas are part of the book's title; you may want to read our articles on the use of Oxford commas and the essay WP:CINS.

You also may want to slow down; while it's great you're enthusiastic, making several edits per minute is a bit too enthusiastic, at least, while you're still learning project norms and the manual of style. GreenLipstickLesbian 💌🧸 03:31, 7 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

And I've just had to revert some edits where the Oxford comma was inserted where it wasn't needed in articles written with English variety that doesn't really use it, and many alterations to direct quotes and titles thereby altering them. Canterbury Tail talk 03:38, 7 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, with the rate of edits, this appears to actually be a bot. So I'm going to block it until we hear otherwise. Unless mass reverting, no one is able to scan 9-10 articles a minute and update appropriate punctuation. Canterbury Tail talk 03:42, 7 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

asilvering (talk) 06:21, 7 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dog Ocean Country Man (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

Sorry about that, I got carried away trying to optimize quickly scanning for grammatical issues. But I can see that in my haste I made errors (e.g., the book titles). I’d say that was a failed experiment and I should have taken this more slowly. But I can confirm that this definitely isn’t a bot account. Sorry for any of the Wiki rules that I broke in that endeavor. Dog Ocean Country Man (talk) 04:42, 14 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to have been actively abusing multiple accounts, including after filing this unblock request. --Blablubbs (talk) 18:58, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dog Ocean Country Man (talk) 04:42, 14 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There are at least two problems here. First, if you're not using a bot, can you explain how, prior to your unblock request, you were able to read 53 articles, and correct commas, in seven minutes? While this may not exclusively be a bot account, you need to disclose what you were doing.

Second, while you were originally blocked for an unauthorized bot, you were given a second block for abusing multiple accounts. This is a checkuser block, meaning it was confirmed by technical data from the accounts, and can only be reversed by another checkuser. This second account, Kappa-rigged city console, which shares your technical information, also exhibited identical behavior, with many bot-like edits of this nature, on the same identically scattered days you were making the edits on this accounts. That account is also blocked for sockpuppetry (and not with this account).

A successful unblock will likely require an extremely convincing explanation of these issues, and may very well require following WP:OFFER and full transparency. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 08:23, 14 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]