User talk:Coconut0330

November 2024

Hello, I'm Vif12vf. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Progressive Action Party, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 18:19, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Law and Justice. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 14:39, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the template

I believe these templates are already sort of exhaustive, and they represent more than just parties with "conservative"/"liberal"/"agrarian" views, but rather parties from conservative/liberal/agrarian currents. SKL and PSL already belong on their respective templates (Templates:Liberalism/Agrarianism in Poland). Polish kurd (talk) 16:13, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Categorization

Regarding your recent categorization edit here, please note that categories need to meet verifiability criteria just as article content does. Additionally, categorization should be clearly supported by the article content. See WP:CATDEF. In the case of the categories you added in the referenced edit, this was clearly not the case for the neo-Nazi category. It could probably be argued for at least one of the other two, but it has to be more clear. ButlerBlog (talk) 17:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)\[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 02:25, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is EC gaming by Coconut0330. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 02:25, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have revoked your EC rights for gaming the system. You will need to start over making constructive edits, continued gaming will result in a block. Mfield (Oi!) 02:29, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

How much edits? Coconut0330 (talk) 13:13, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need 500 new constructive edits. 500 is the original requirement and what I usually see when EC is revoked. Toast1454_T_C 15:13, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wait I need to do another 500 edits? Coconut0330 (talk) 15:17, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, another 500. Toast1454_T_C 17:54, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

500 contructive edits, starting after EC was revoked. Toast1454_T_C 17:54, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. You will need to amass another 500 constructive edits. The 500 edit requirement is a community expectation for ECP, and by attempting to circumvent that you have demonstrated a willingness to disregard the community. You now need to re-earn that trust. Mfield (Oi!) 18:10, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Well I will talk to you guys again when I reach 1000 edits. Coconut0330 (talk) 19:14, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(if you guys are still active or if that happens lol) Coconut0330 (talk) 19:14, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]