User talk:CoatCheck
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, CoatCheck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Red Director (talk) 03:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Red Schoendienst
[edit]On 7 June 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Red Schoendienst, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 17:09, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Luke Perry
[edit]On 5 March 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Luke Perry, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 23:50, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Jared Lorenzen
[edit]On 6 July 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jared Lorenzen, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.
SpencerT•C 21:52, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Allee Willis
[edit]On 28 December 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Allee Willis, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 00:14, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Rush Limbaugh
[edit]On 17 February 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rush Limbaugh, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 17:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Markie Post
[edit]On 10 August 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Markie Post, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 19:26, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Norm Macdonald
[edit]On 15 September 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Norm Macdonald, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Skootamassa (talk) 10:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Max Cleland
[edit]On 11 November 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Max Cleland, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 04:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
On 28 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Tony Dow, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 01:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
BangJan1999 02:02, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Contentions topic alert
[edit]
You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:13, 29 March 2026 (UTC)