User talk:Burjkh

Welcome!

Hi Burjkh! I noticed your contributions to Sant Lluís and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! – T C Memoire 11:07, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vexillum (constellation) (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nil NZ was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I personally think this is interesting, but unfortunately have to decline it at this stage as more reliable sources are needed in order to meet our inclusion criteria. A search on Google Scholar and Google Books return some promising results.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vexillum (constellation) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nil🥝 01:29, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Burjkh! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nil🥝 01:29, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vexillum (constellation)

Hello, Burjkh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vexillum (constellation), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 9 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vexillum (constellation)

Hello, Burjkh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Vexillum".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:18, 7 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

May 2026

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Carentan when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:50, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

What's your opinion on the logos below?

United States Soccer Federation (1930-1934)
This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed.
United States Soccer Federation (1934-1936)
This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed.
United States Soccer Federation (1950)
Issues: Curved edges when they should be sharp. The typeface I think is Eurostile.
United States Soccer Federation (1950)
This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed.
United States national soccer team (1984-1986)
This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed. Helvetica should be used if the right typeface can't be found.
United States national soccer team (1984-1986, alternate)
This problematic SVG should eventually be fixed. Helvetica should be used if the right typeface can't be found.

Just your opinion about the vectorization of these logos. I tried to get them vectorized outside Wikimedia projects and it didn't go as planned. I meant I tried to get an outside graphist to vectorize it and he completely botched it. Candidyeoman55 (talk) 20:52, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]