User talk:BridgeBoy1980
A belated welcome!
[edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, BridgeBoy1980! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
If you have questions, ; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! User:Nil NZ (talk) 00:42, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hi BridgeBoy1980, was glad to see that everything was sorted and your block was lifted when I woke up this morning – welcome back! I hope that the whole situation hasn't put you off editing and that you do stick around. Wikipedia and its rules can be pretty convoluted at times, especially for new editors, so just wanted to drop the above welcome message, as it has some useful links for both new and experienced editors alike!
- Things like WP:ENGVAR are just one of many learning curves that exist, and has lead to many Talk page debates – in fact, there's an entire archive of discussions a Talk:U2 about whether
U2 are
or U2 is "an Irish rock band..." Don't let that discourage you from editing pages outside your geographic region, as we know that it is an easy mistake to make – I've certainly had other editors fix my -ise to -ize when I've used them without thinking. - I know there was some discussion about whether the edits or automated or not (hell, I've certainly hyper-fixated on stuff 16+ hours before – adhd is one helluva drug...), so just wanted to give you a heads up about our policy for bots and automated scripts. The use of AI on Wikipedia is also pretty contentious (we have some hardliners against any use of AI, while other believe it could be utilised constructively). Using it to write article content is generally prohibited, but using it to identify issues is probably a pretty constructive way such tools could be utilised. You may be interested in checking out WP:WikiProject AI Tools, a collaborative project of editors interested in constructive uses of AI for maintenance and editing on Wikipedia.
- You may also be interested in Wikipedia:Typo Team, which has a number of ongoing projects to fix spelling and grammar errors across Wikipedia; WP:Typo Team/moss was one of the first projects I got involved with as a new editor, and is one that I think you may find particularly rewarding :)
- Anyway, enough from me – welcome back, and happy editing! nil nz 00:06, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hi - thanks so much for this. I really appreciate it. I'll take a look at those links you sent through to make sure that I am up to date with my understanding of the various policies. And thanks for the tip re the Wikipedia:Typo Team! I'll take a look. Hope to see you around and thanks for your kindness :) BridgeBoy1980 (talk) 09:00, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
Template
[edit]{{rfc}} is for Wikipedia Request for Comments which are very different from IETF Request for Commentss. Polygnotus (talk) 11:34, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
- Ah noted - thank you. BridgeBoy1980 (talk) 11:45, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
- Instead, please use the special link
[[rfc:...]], as in rfc:742. It may be piped, as here. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 23:08, 30 April 2026 (UTC)
- Instead, please use the special link
Short descriptions
[edit]Thank you for adding Short descriptions to articles and wishing to update existing descriptions. However, most of these new descriptions have been much too long – the current guidelines at WP:SDSHORT advise a limit of around 40 characters. The full guidelines are at WP:SDCONTENT — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 18:25, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
- Oh, thanks for the heads up! I'll go back and make them shorter in line with the guidelines. BridgeBoy1980 (talk) 19:15, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 5
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Agile Software Corporation
- added a link pointing to Visualization
- Fifth Generation Systems
- added a link pointing to Symantec
- ON Technology
- added a link pointing to Firewall
- Recourse Technologies
- added a link pointing to Symantec
- Revivio
- added a link pointing to Symantec
- Riptech
- added a link pointing to Symantec
- Whitewater Group
- added a link pointing to Symantec
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 22:01, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
May 2026
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bus mastering, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. There's a whole slew of recent edits you made, none of which seem to have proper sourcing. Drmies (talk) 15:33, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
Please stop: are you using an LLM to have this stuff written up? Drmies (talk) 15:34, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hi - no, I am not. I just get very into edit sessions and find it hard to concentrate on anything else other than Wikipedia edits. I have autism and apologise. Trying to be a valuable member as much as I can. BridgeBoy1980 (talk) 15:57, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop and explain. Drmies (talk) 15:35, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

- I wasn't vandalising knowingly. Sorry. I am trying to be constructive. I've stopped now. BridgeBoy1980 (talk) 15:58, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- Well, I stopped you. I asked you to stop, I reverted you, but you kept making these edits, one every minute or every other minute. I do not understand how you could write that much content in all those articles at that speed, and that is precisely what you will need to explain, to another administrator, in an unblock request, because I do not really believe this. Drmies (talk) 17:07, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- Okay - but that seems like a waste of administrators' time. BridgeBoy1980 (talk) 19:12, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Chatul - you rightly queried why I am a suspected LLM on the talk page of Thin-film memory. It's because @Drmies inexplicably thinks I'm an LLM. As you mention, my edits were "appropriate, legitimate and necessary". I hope they are reverted before long. BridgeBoy1980 (talk) 19:19, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- Nope, bye. No thanks. Whatever you are doing. We'll notice it if you try that again too. Even if Drmies dropped it I would take this to ANI. —DIYeditor (talk) 05:40, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Okay. That sounds like it would be against the spirit of Wikipedia on multiple fronts, but all to be discussed at ANI. BridgeBoy1980 (talk) 08:37, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Inexplicable? A rate of 60/hour seems like ample grounds for suspicion, even if it's not proof. The text itself certainly looks legitimate, but you could add a lot of relevant citations without running into BLUESKY. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 13:58, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Nope, bye. No thanks. Whatever you are doing. We'll notice it if you try that again too. Even if Drmies dropped it I would take this to ANI. —DIYeditor (talk) 05:40, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Chatul - you rightly queried why I am a suspected LLM on the talk page of Thin-film memory. It's because @Drmies inexplicably thinks I'm an LLM. As you mention, my edits were "appropriate, legitimate and necessary". I hope they are reverted before long. BridgeBoy1980 (talk) 19:19, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- Okay - but that seems like a waste of administrators' time. BridgeBoy1980 (talk) 19:12, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
- Well, I stopped you. I asked you to stop, I reverted you, but you kept making these edits, one every minute or every other minute. I do not understand how you could write that much content in all those articles at that speed, and that is precisely what you will need to explain, to another administrator, in an unblock request, because I do not really believe this. Drmies (talk) 17:07, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 12
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Agile Software Corporation
- added a link pointing to Visualization
- ON Technology
- added a link pointing to Firewall
- Wheeler Jump
- added a link pointing to Accumulator
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:09, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

BridgeBoy1980 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)
Request reason:
Decline reason:
We don't believe you are an LLM, we believe you are using an LLM. Yamla (talk) 22:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I just went through another set of your edits and indeed one of them had a citation for one single paragraph, a citation that was already in the article. The LLM suspicion here is the astonishing speed with which all that text is supposed to have been written, flawlessly. Drmies (talk) 21:30, 12 May 2026 (UTC)