User talk:Apallo334

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Apallo334 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia editors, I would like to respectfully request the repeal of my Wikipedia ban. It has now been almost three years since my account was blocked, and I want to express that I never had any negative intentions or a desire to harm the quality of Wikipedia in any way. I was blocked for ‘not here to build an encyclopedia’ and my lackluster participation in communication and I probably deservingly so

During my time editing, I created several pages that and in use today, Hiroshi Nagai, Innovative Communication, Xiaoma, and some others. I took great interest in sharing niche topics that seemed underrepresented or at risk of being forgotten. I had a “if Wikipedia doesn’t mention it, then it doesn’t exist,” mentality which led me to edit and create pages rather impulsively. My incoherent enthusiasm may have caused issues, while my intentions weren’t at all negative. Regarding failing to communicate, I completely fumbled the ball on that - and I have zero excuses.

I sincerely apologize for any disruption or inconvenience my actions caused to the editing community. Since my block, I’ve taken the time to study Wikipedia’s rules, guidelines, and editorial standards more thoroughly. I now have a much clearer understanding of notability, sourcing, and the collaborative spirit that keeps Wikipedia reliable.

I would be very grateful for the opportunity to return and contribute responsibly. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best Wishes,

SpoonksSpoonks (talk) 18:11, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I am willing to give you another chance. Welcome back. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:53, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

April 2026

Hello, I'm JimRenge. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dark Enlightenment, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please consider visiting the WP:TEAHOUSE if you have any questions about editing wikipedia. JimRenge (talk) 09:39, 28 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JimRenge, thanks for your concern

The citation I used for 'The Cracker Factory' is from Chapter 4c of Nick Land's own 'Dark Enlightenment' essay from 2012 - https://www.thedarkenlightenment.com/the-dark-enlightenment-by-nick-land/#part4c

"Biological Leninism" is a term commonly used by neo-reactionaries online, such as on Reddit and Discord. This is the book where the term originated: https://www.scribd.com/document/518508634/Spandrell-Biological-Lenninism Apallo334 (talk) 18:18, 28 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Spandrell is some guy's blog and his treatment of Leninism is the fringe of the fringe. Please actually learn to identify reliable sources. Simonm223 (talk) 16:15, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

And frankly the same can be said of Nick Land. He's reliable for his own fringe opinions but, per WP:FRINGE, reliable secondary sources are required to determine which of his propositions are actually notable. Simonm223 (talk) 16:18, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, that's fair... However, I believe the paragraph on “Slave, Sister, Sexborg, Sphinx", Land & Moldbug's critique of Richard Dawkins, and some of the additions I made to the 'cracker factory' deserve to stay Apallo334 (talk) 18:57, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Inline citations

I have noticed that you are providing sources, but you are putting them in as external links. They should be formatted as inline citations (external links should not be used in the body of an article). See WP:INLINECITE for how to cite your sources. ButlerBlog (talk) 23:20, 28 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Would this be acceptable?

^[1]

May 2026

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dark Enlightenment, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Please do not add content based on self-published sources. See WP:SPS and WP:BURDEN for additional info. JimRenge (talk) 06:29, 3 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello JimRenge, thanks for your concern

This is an archive of Nick Land's 1994 book 'meltdown' - in which he deliberately describes 'synthetic feminization' and 'lesbian vampires' as Post-Structuralist metaphors http://www.ccru.net/swarm1/1_melt.htm

This is an achieve of Nick Land's essay 'Kant, capital, and the prohibition of incest', this essay was included as part of Fanged Noumena ^[2]

^[3]^[4] Apallo334 (talk) 06:49, 3 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in J. J. McCullough, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sahaib (talk) 07:22, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your concern. Please feel free to use any categories I listed you find appropriate, if you're not unhappy with each one of them Apallo334 (talk) 07:34, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Apallo334! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Vocal fry register and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. ~ oklopfer (💬) 02:34, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out! I wasn't aware I accidentally pressed it. Apallo334 (talk) 02:38, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 13:14, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Pacific Northwest English

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pacific Northwest English, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:30, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buffalo-style Pizza has been accepted

Buffalo-style Pizza, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 06:14, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cuisine of Seattle (May 10)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Johannes Maximilian, left the following feedback:

This is WP:SYNTH as none of the cited sources discusses the draft's subject. Instead, the subject has been synthesised from the sources, i.e., it is made up. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:00, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Next steps

Edit Draft:Cuisine of Seattle to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:00, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Apallo334! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:00, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cuisine of Utah (May 10)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Johannes Maximilian, left the following feedback:

This is WP:SYNTH. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:48, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Next steps

Edit Draft:Cuisine of Utah to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:48, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cuisine of Buffalo, New York (May 11)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This draft appears to contain copyrighted material from https://www.thefooddictator.com/hirshon-buffalo-wings/, which has been removed. Wikipedia strictly prohibits copyright violations. Assume all text is copyrighted unless released under a compatible license.

We can only accept text if it is explicitly released under a compatible free license or is in the public domain.
If the text is not freely licensed, you must rewrite or summarize it entirely in your own words. Changing a few words is still considered a copyright violation.
If you own the text you cannot paste it here unless you formally release it via our release process.

Users who continue to post copyrighted material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Draft:Cuisine of Buffalo, New York may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page..

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

「NuggFrog」 (talk) 02:05, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Direct-to-Consumer Pharmaceutical Advertising on Television in the United States (May 12)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, NuggFrog, left the following feedback:

This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Fails WP:NOLLM. Please do not use AI to write articles.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Direct-to-Consumer Pharmaceutical Advertising on Television in the United States to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

「NuggFrog」 (talk) 03:09, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Girls developmental advantages over boys in adolescence (May 13)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Devonian Wombat, left the following feedback:

This draft does not have sufficient content to warrant a standalone article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Puberty#Differences between male and female puberty.

Edit the existing article to include your text and citations into an appropriate section.
If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's Talk page.

There is nothing in this stub that cannot be included at the main article. A spinoff article should have the same name as the section in the main article.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Girls developmental advantages over boys in adolescence to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 20:01, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cuisine of Buffalo, New York (May 13)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Devonian Wombat, left the following feedback:

This draft does not have sufficient content to warrant a standalone article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Buffalo, New York#Cuisine.

Edit the existing article to include your text and citations into an appropriate section.
If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's Talk page.

There does not seem to be any content here that could not be covered at the main article or the articles for Buffalo wings and/or Buffalo-style pizza etc, making this an unnecessary content fork.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Cuisine of Buffalo, New York to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:28, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Moving articles and disambiguators

Hello. We only add disambiguation in parenthesis when there are two articles with conflicting titles, and that is not the case for the articles you are moving.

Please stop, and kindly bring up potential moves on the article's associated talk pages rather than moving them yourself in the future. MrOllie (talk) 12:44, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks for reaching out Apallo334 (talk) 19:16, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Class of '09 (drama thriller) was a genuine disambiguation, it's so it wouldn't get confused with a visual novel series of the same name: Class of '09 Apallo334 (talk) 19:40, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

When one article is the main topic, as in that case, it doesn't get disambiguation in the title. MrOllie (talk) 21:29, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Criticism of Abraham Lincoln has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Criticism of Abraham Lincoln. Thanks! SomeoneDreaming (talk) 21:13, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Criticism of Abraham Lincoln

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Criticism of Abraham Lincoln requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.loyalbooks.com/download/text/Our-American-Holidays-Lincolns-Birthday.txt. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 10:03, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just want to give my take on the removal of 'Criticism of Abraham Lincoln'

The article is a synthesis of widely discussed historical interpretations of Abraham Lincoln’s legacy rather than a reproduction of any single source, most of The information I used came from Howard Zinn's 'A People's History of The United States'. I used some opinions from Libertarians like Murray Rothbard and Ron Paul to keep the article non-partisan, as well as some generic mainstream sources like History.com.

I have never seen or heard of that article before - I skimmed through it, and it and from what I've seen it largely portrays Lincoln as very positive.

“As a boy, no less than since, Abraham Lincoln had an honorable conscientiousness, integrity, industry, and an ardent love of knowledge.”

“These are very humble incidents, but they illustrate the man's perfect conscientiousness—his sensitive honesty—better perhaps than they would if they were of greater moment.”

“He passed, unmoved by worldly fear or pelf; In all his lusty toil he found not God, In the wilderness he found himself.”

I apologize for this misunderstanding. Thank you! Apallo334 (talk) 22:18, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of Abraham Lincoln moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Criticism of Abraham Lincoln. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because IT does not appear to be true to the title. There are insufficient instances and sufficient t sourcing to merit its own article.. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 21:05, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

June 2026

Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Triangulation (politics), you may be blocked from editing. Annh07 (talk) 22:04, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I literally reversed it like a minute later, then went to talk page to discuss. I immediately realized my mistake, Check the history of the page. Apallo334 (talk) 00:52, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You did not move the page back to its original title Triangulation (politics), but instead moved it to Triangulation (Politics); "politics" should not be capitalized unless it is a proper noun, so Triangulation (Politics) is an incorrect title.

Note that if you are unable to perform the move, please submit a request at WP:RMTR. Annh07 (talk) 03:40, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

That was a typo, I had no intention of violating naming conventions or consensus. I apologize, I wouldn't have reverted the article title back to 'Triangulation' if I had negative intentions. Apallo334 (talk) 03:55, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Usonia (Name) (June 15)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Dan arndt, left the following feedback:

This draft does not have sufficient content to warrant a standalone article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Usonia#Etymology.

Edit the existing article to include your text and citations into an appropriate section.
If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's Talk page.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Usonia (Name) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:07, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

^ Land, Nick (2012-05-17). "The Dark Enlightenment, Part 4c: The Cracker Factory". Retrieved 2026-04-28.
^ Land, Nick (1988). "Kant, Capital, and the Prohibition of Incest" (PDF). Third Text. doi:10.1080/09528828808576206. Retrieved 2026-05-03.
^ Le 2019b, p. 17.
^ Outsideness [@Outsideness] (21 October 2019). "Kant, Capital, and thee Prohibition of Incest is the kind of lunacy that results from not understanding the Hajnal Line. ..." (Tweet) – via Twitter.

[1] Land, Nick (2012-05-17). "The Dark Enlightenment, Part 4c: The Cracker Factory". Retrieved 2026-04-28.

[2] Land, Nick (1988). "Kant, Capital, and the Prohibition of Incest" (PDF). Third Text. doi:10.1080/09528828808576206. Retrieved 2026-05-03.

[FOOTNOTELe2019b17-3] Le 2019b, p. 17.

[4] Outsideness [@Outsideness] (21 October 2019). "Kant, Capital, and thee Prohibition of Incest is the kind of lunacy that results from not understanding the Hajnal Line. ..." (Tweet) – via Twitter.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]