Talk:Superstructure

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Superstructure article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives (index): 1: 3 months

Text or other creative content from this version of Superstructure was copied or moved into Base and superstructure with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived by if there are more than 5.

Split needed

This should be either a disambig page, or a page about superstructure in engineering, with a dis note to other uses. Thoughts? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:52, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need a split so much as simply removing everything that isn't engineering – because that's already discussed elsewhere. I will just do it. Hans Adler 18:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We can merge the social content into base and superstructure. That will transform this article into Superstructure (engineering). I suggest that this article is moved to that title, and a new disambig created in its place. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:18, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Or we just leave it here. The overwhelming number of incoming links was for the engineering topic. I have just finished redirected everything else to base and superstructure. Hans Adler 18:28, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have done the split and also removed the WikiProject Sociology. While doing that, I noticed it said "Importance: High". Given the state of the article I find that hard to take seriously, and in any case superstructure (sociology) can still be created if necessary. Hans Adler 18:42, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 19:13, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Superstructures of ships need to be split into an own article.

(All present images show these.)

--Ikar.us (talk) 09:58, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: withdrawn per nominator. ErikHaugen (talk) 16:41, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Superstructure → Superstructure (civil engineering) — Disambig needed. Superstructure in physics is also quite important. Marie Poise (talk) 17:41, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Marie_Poise/Superstructure → Superstructure
Oppose - I think that while the other meanings are important, when it comes to what readers are likely to be looking for they are a distant second to the subject of this page. If that is true, then per WP:PT this article should sit here. I'd like to move User:Marie_Poise/Superstructure to Superstructure (disambiguation) and adjust the hatnote here accordingly. ErikHaugen (talk) 20:20, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This depends very much on whether you are an engineer, a scientist, or a philosopher. Google scholar: hits #1 and #3-6,8-10 go to superstructure (condensed matter), #2 goes to base and superstructure, #7 is an astrophysical analogue of superstructure (condensed matter). Superstructure (engineering) seems of little importance for scholars. -- Marie Poise (talk) 21:40, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is unsurprising - ship superstructures don't sound like a particularly interesting research topic. If this encyclopedia were targeted at scholars then I would agree with your conclusion. But consider that normal dictionaries typically don't even mention the uses other than the subject of this article. When most people say "superstructure" they're talking about ships. ErikHaugen (talk) 22:57, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose to the common person, the current article is the primary usage. WP:JARGON on the other meanings. The dab page can go at superstructure (disambiguation) 76.66.203.138 (talk) 04:22, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I accept that as a majority vote. -- Marie Poise (talk) 05:31, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The most times that I have heard or read the word "superstructure" it meant a ship's or boat's superstructure. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:44, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't that be an argument in favor of "oppose"? ErikHaugen (talk) 15:48, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is closed, folks. I have withdrawn my proposal and implemented the solution Erik proposed. -- Marie Poise (talk) 16:19, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Huh?

"...having the degree of freedom zero [in the terms of theory of machines]"

What on earth is all this about? --Eamonnca1 ^TALK 08:03, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Superlattice article

Superlattice Doesn't it worth to make a common article for this kind of structures? There is also a relationship with articles where multilayer optical devices are mentioned.--193.146.9.175 (talk) 11:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]