Talk:Renewable energy debate
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Renewable energy debate article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Merger proposal
[edit]User:BlowingTopHat has suggested that Wind farm opposition be merged into Renewable energy debate#Community debate about wind farms.
- Support. Keep both sides of the wind farm debate together, and in the context of the Renewable energy debate. Johnfos (talk) 23:58, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- No opposition to merge, so have done that. Johnfos (talk) 13:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Since I was last here massive amounts of referenced material has been removed
[edit]~20th June 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.167.182.185 (talk) 08:32, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Renewable energy debate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080528070938/http://reme.epfl.ch/webdav/site/reme/users/106542/public/SHS4/Gr01.pdf to http://reme.epfl.ch/webdav/site/reme/users/106542/public/SHS4/Gr01.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080720132956/http://nccnsw.org.au/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=2148 to http://nccnsw.org.au/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&id=2148
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Canada's Response to Global Environmental Wicked Problems
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 15 January 2025 and 7 May 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dymin04 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Greatkingjeff (talk) 19:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
No longer makes sense as a single article
[edit]I don’t know about 2010 when this article was created but nowadays the debate about hydro is extremely different from the debate about solar. So I think the info here (where still good and not duplicated elsewhere) should be moved to other articles and this title deleted or redirected. What do you think? Chidgk1 (talk) 09:22, 19 September 2025 (UTC)