Jump to content

Talk:PulteGroup

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

News article that might fit here

[edit]

For consideration by regular and knowledgeable editors:

  • Dina Cappiello (2008-06-11). "4 homebuilders fined $4.3 million for water pollution in 34 states". Delaware News-Journal. Washington: Gannett Company. Retrieved 2008-06-12. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:14, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice ad for Pulte Homes

[edit]

Looks like the company wrote this ad themselves. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.173.50 (talk) 19:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism section

[edit]

I have restored the 'Criticism' section removed by 12.151.72.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). According to whois, this IP maps to "PULTE HOMES PULTE-HO420-72", suggesting that this removal is an instance of Conflict of Interest. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 21:01, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the 'Criticism' and 'References' sections removed by Ianestew (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). This user's only edit was to remove these sections without explanation. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:21, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the 'Criticism' section which was removed by 12.151.72.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) without justification yet again. A12774125 (talk) 08:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism section has been removed. Again. Wikipedia does allow criticism of private businesses, you know.--152.65.33.199 (talk) 20:42, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the criticism section was removed without comment and missing for around 9 years. After the string of attempts to remove it that were documented above, it looks like the last time it was removed was in December 2009:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PulteGroup&type=revision&diff=329168922&oldid=321498780&diffmode=source

Today I restored it: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PulteGroup&oldid=831780429 mennonot (talk)

Proposing changes to the content of the page

[edit]


Information to be added or removed:

PANGIfroth (talk) 13:31, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 26-JUL-2019

[edit]

  Edit request partially implemented  

  • Please note that the numbers below correspond to the numbers in the request.
  1. Green tickY The infobox parameters were changed.
  2. Green tickY The Lead section was updated.
  3. Red XN This paragraph was not added because the items listed within it were not WikiLinked.
  4. Red XN The History section was not renamed.
  5. Red XN The items in the History section which were asked to be moved to the paragraph following the lead section were not done so because that paragraph was not approved. (See #3.) No other items in the History section were asked to be changed.
  6. Red XN The awards section was not added.
  7. Red XN The Criticism section was not renamed. Per WP:CSECTION these types of sections ought to be incorporated into the main body of text.
  8. Red XN The requested information to be added to the Criticism section was not added because a key claim was not referenced.[a] Other claims in this section were either added or not added based on different reasons.[b]
  9. Red XN The Corporate Causes section was not added per WP:NOBLECAUSE.

Regards,  Spintendo  14:28, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

  1. ^ The unreferenced claim was underlined in red in the original request.
  2. ^ One claim which was referenced was added to the article. Another claim contained a grammatical error and could not be added.

Proposed changes/Response per previous edit request

[edit]

Information be to added:

PANGIfroth (talk) 21:55, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 27-JUL-2019

[edit]

  Edit request partially implemented  

  1. Red XN The listing of brand names was not done for previously specified reasons.
  2. Green tickY The History section was updated.
  3. Green tickY The award was added to the History section.
  4. Red XN The requested text was not added to the Criticism section because the statement ... and also provided over $78.7 million in homeowner relief. is not clear in what is meant by "homeowner relief".

Additional changes made:

  1. The lead section claim regarding Forbes was moved to the History section.
  2. A clade was added to the Milestones subsection.

Regards,  Spintendo  23:02, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

net income mistake?

[edit]

In the box at the top of the page, net income is listed as: Net income Increase $100.463 billion (2018)

I seriously doubt they have $100b in net income in 2018. NASDAQ lists NI as just over $1b.https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/phm/financials

NOTE: I don't normally leave comments on wikipedia, so I apologize if I did it wrong. If someone wants to move this or edit it, it's fine by me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirin-rex (talkcontribs) 02:04, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]