Talk:Nintendo Music
Appearance
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nintendo Music article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Nintendo Music" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
| Nintendo Music has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 24, 2026. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Split proposal (or remove the list entirely).
[edit]At present, I want to say the list of soundtracks on the service is already give or take a third of the article. Something that, as more soundtracks get added to the service, will only continue to grow. It probably made sense to do it this way when the service only had a handful of soundtracks at launch, but now with over a hundred present tracks, it's unreasonable to continue maintaining it. Honestly the page isn't too far off from being considered a list given how much of the page is this list (out of the pages 76,700 bytes in size, about 44,400 of it is from the soundtrack list alone). As such, one of these two options should be done:
- Remove the list entirely. This would be more in line with something like WP:NOTDATABASE or WP:NOTCATALOG. Is listing every single individual soundtrack something that's needed to understand the service?
- Create a standalone list article with a title similar to "List of soundtracks on Nintendo Music". The content from this page would then be split out to there.
λ NegativeMP1 01:23, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
- 2. The entries all seem to be cited to reliable sources, so I would see a split happening. RedShellMomentum 02:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
- I don't know. I don't have a problem with the list now that we've pared it back from before, but I don't feel like there's enough to support 2 articles either. Maybe we should trim the list back some. I don't think it really matters to list the date it was added. Sergecross73 msg me 02:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
- 2 per RedShell. I agree that it is getting long and it would be useful to spin it off into its own article given it being covered by many reliable sources as songs release on the app. EvanTech10 (talk) 11:54, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
- Neither per Serge. The list doesn't seem too unruly at present, and the article certainly isn't long enough to demand a split per WP:SIZERULE. It seems fine in its current iteration, personally speaking. – Rhain ☔ he
him 22:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Video games good articles
- GA-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- GA-Class Nintendo articles
- Nintendo task force articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- GA-Class Internet articles
- Low-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- GA-Class Japan-related articles
- Low-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles


