Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nominating featured lists in Wikipedia

This star, with one point broken, symbolizes the featured candidates on Wikipedia.

Welcome to featured list candidates! Here, we determine which lists are of a good enough quality to be featured lists (FLs). Featured lists exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and must satisfy the featured list criteria.

Before nominating a list, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at peer review. This process is not a substitute for peer review. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the featured list candidate (FLC) process. Those who are not significant contributors to the list should consult regular editors of the list before nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly.

A list should not be listed at featured list candidates and another review process at the same time. Nominators who have previously successfully nominated a list may have two concurrent featured list nominations only if the first active nomination has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed.

The featured list director, Giants2008, or his delegates, PresN and Hey man im josh, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. Each nomination will typically last at least twenty days, but may last longer if changes are ongoing or insufficient discussion or analysis has occurred. For a nomination to be promoted to FL status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. The directors determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the director who considers a nomination and its reviews:

  • actionable objections have not been resolved in a timely manner; or
  • consensus for promotion has not been reached after significant time; or
  • reviewers are unable to judge whether the criteria have been met.

It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the process focuses on finding and resolving problems in relation to the criteria, rather than asserting the positives. Declarations of support are not as important as finding and resolving issues, and the process is not simply vote-counting.

Once the director or a delegate has decided to close a nomination, they will do so on the nominations page. A bot will update the list talk page after the list is promoted or the nomination archived, typically within the day, and the {{FLC}} template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates or adds the {{Article history}} template. If a nomination is archived, the nominator should take adequate time to resolve issues before re-nominating.

Purge the cache to refresh this page – Table of contents – Closing instructions

Shortcut

Featured content:

Featured list tools:

Nominations urgently needing reviews

The following lists were nominated almost 2 months ago and have had their review time extended because objections are still being addressed, the nomination has not received enough reviews, or insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met. If you have not yet reviewed them, please take the time to do so:

Source reviews needed

The following lists were nominated for removal more than 14 days ago:

Nominations

[edit]

List of international goals scored by Cyle Larin

[edit]
Nominator(s): kline / talk / contribs 20:34, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Round four for FL nominations! I decided to pick this list this time around because it's FIFA World Cup time, and what isn't a better way to celebrate then nominating one of Canada's best goalscorers. Cyle Larin debuted in 2014 and made his climb, passing Dwayne De Rosario to hold the all-time goalscorer record for Canada for two years before being surpassed by Jonathan David in 2024. Hope you enjoy! kline / talk / contribs 20:34, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "A full international for Canada, Larin" - you literally just said that in the previous sentence, there's no need to say it again
  • "Larin scored his first and only international hat-trick for Canada " - last two words are redundant - who else would he have scored it for?
  • "World Cup Qualification campaign overall" - no need for a capital Q on qualification
  • "a remarkable run" - this is POV
  • As the table is sortable, stadium names and competitions need to be linked each time (as countries already are)
  • That's all I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @ChrisTheDude All concerns should be addressed. kline / talk / contribs 16:20, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of murines

[edit]
Nominator(s): PresN 20:32, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, mammal list #78 in our perpetual series and rodent list #23: Murinae. This is our final species list of the last family in this series, the giant family of Muridae. The subfamily Murinae, is, unfortunately, itself giant, there being over 600 species of Old World mice and rats, and it's not even really dividable into smaller sublists, as they're scattered throughout 136 genera. There's just an absurd number of mice and rats in the world, but I was determined to keep the pattern of the prior 77 lists, and in the end I've managed to find ways to keep it well under the page size limits, including as with our other large mammal lists having the IUCN cites be to the genus pages rather than the species ones so that we don't have 600+ of them. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 20:32, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Czechoslovak Figure Skating Championships

[edit]
Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:26, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am very proud of having finished this article, because it required me to physically go to the National Library of the Czech Republic while I was in Prague this past spring for the World Figure Skating Championships (at the same time I finished Slovak Figure Skating Championships). The copyright on several articles from the 1920s was such that they could only be accessed from a terminal at the library, and could not be printed or photographed. I had to show the library docent that I was using my phone to translate the text from Czech to English, and not taking pictures! Anyway, I have verified all of the results, the tables should be formatted properly, and the sources should also be formatted properly. Please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions, and I look forward to your constructive feedback. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:26, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

[edit]

Here shall be an image review from me. Arconning (talk) 13:46, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • File:Czechoslovak Figure Skating Union Pin.png - Public domain
  • File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-L1129-0018, Ondrej Nepela.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-C1114-0008-002, Jana Mrazkova.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-A1118-0005-001, Eva Romanova, Pawel Roman.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 de
  • File:Karel Diven (Tjechoslowakije) kunstrijden, Bestanddeelnr 914-8822.jpg - CC0
  • File:Eva Romanová and Pavel Roman 1965.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0 nl, seems to be under CC0 in the source
  • All of the images have alt-text for accessibility, all are relevant to the article, just waiting on the licensing.
User:Arconning: I am not well versed in copyright technicalities, so I’m not sure what you’re asking for. Bgsu98 (Talk) 17:03, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of Kim Seon-ho live performances

[edit]
Nominator(s): Preferwiki (talk) 06:22, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This is my third proposal for a feature list nomination. With two of the other lists already promoted to feature lists (Kim Seon-ho filmography and List of awards and nominations received by Kim Seon-ho, here's the latest in this series focusing on his live performances. I have tried my best to incorporate suggestions from my past experience in prior featurelist nominations into this page. Thanks in advance for reviewing! -- Preferwiki (talk) 06:22, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs recorded by My Chemical Romance

[edit]
Nominator(s): Gavetheman555 (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

My Chemical Romance is one of those bands you could listen to over and over and never get bored. I can't say I haven't listened to I Brought You My Bullets thousands of times and still find new stuff to like about it. I've been working on this for almost two weeks now and I believe it is finally ready for FL status, not much more to really say. (P.S thank you to zmbro for additionally cleaning up the article in preparation for this :) Gavetheman555 (talk) 02:31, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

[edit]

Here shall be an image review from me. Arconning (talk) 13:39, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • File:My Chemical Romance rain.jpg - CC BY 2.0, do add an archived page as the license has changed on the website.
  • File:Thursday @ Claremont Showgrounds (5 3 2012) (7005619497).jpg - CC BY 2.0, do add an archived page as the license has changed on the website. Caption is unsourced, please do add one.
  • File:Howard Benson.png - CC BY-SA 4.0, source for caption as well
  • File:Bob Dylan (1965).jpg - Public domain
  • File:Rob Cavallo.jpg - CC BY 2.0, source for caption as well
  • File:Queen News Of The World (1977 Press Kit Photo 01).jpg - Public domain
  • Every image seems to have alt-text for accessibility and are relevant to the article.
Implemented all the changes, thank you for the support! Gavetheman555 (talk) 14:01, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Triple Crown of Thoroughbred Racing (Japan)

[edit]
Nominator(s): RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 10:47, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Japan's Thoroughbred scene is quite rare in that it has five national Triple Crown titles up for grabs, rather than the usual one or two. While individually there isn't reams of paragraphs to say on each of them, they're still very important in the horse racing world, and still remain very elusive; while there's been many close calls, there's only 17 horses that have achieved any of them (Could have been 18 if the rain had held off in the Takarazuka Kinen today!) I think the article is in pretty good shape now, and gives a very comprehensive overview of the Crowns and their winners.

While I have a FA under my belt, this is my first FL submission (and I believe this is the first thoroughbred related FL submission in general?), so I look forward to your comments. :) As one note for the later 'list of individual X Crown winners' part, I'm happy if that should be moved to its own page if desired by reviewers, seemed to be 50/50 on including based on similar articles. As you can imagine, many of these horses have entries on the Japanese wiki, so ILL links could be added if desired - I'd erred on doing that as I figured a sea of red might be offputting. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 10:47, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Women's Amateur Snooker Championship

[edit]
Nominator(s): BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 01:18, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Another cue sports list from me. The Women's Billiards Association seems to have attempted to wipe the first edition of this championship from history. A few decades later, the event was starting to come out of the obscurity it experienced during the 1960s and 1970s when it was killed off by factionalism. Relevant extracts from source are available to reviewers on request. Thanks in advance for improvement suggestions. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 01:18, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • The norm is to have the lead image right at the top, so I would do that here too
  • "when due to confusion about the date of her first match, she did not attend" => "when, due to confusion about the date of her first match, she did not attend"
  • "who compiled maker of the highest break" - wording seems a bit mangled here
  • "West's management of the wBSA" - lower case w?
  • "and according to an article in Snooker Scene magazine, was "supported ... by virtually all serious women players." => "and, according to an article in Snooker Scene magazine, was "supported ... by virtually all serious women players."
  • "The most wins in consecutive years by a player was four, by Selby from 1972 to 1974" - that's only three years.....?
  • You say that the 1932 event was open, yet the title is Women's Amateur Snooker Championship, so presumably at some point professionals must have been barred from it....?
  • I relied too much on a particular source for this. Reports of the final in the press make it clear that by the time it happened it was indeed the women's amateur championship. I've swapped a source. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:16, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Did the competition come to an end because of all that splinter group stuff in the fifth para? Your nomination statement above seems to imply that but the article doesn't explicitly state that.....

Dutch Figure Skating Championships

[edit]
Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:04, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Although I had this article completed for some time, it was largely sourced to the Dutch skating union's own publication, so I undertook a search through Dutch newspaper archives for independent sources. There was no lack of newspaper coverage for Dutch figure skating, and the media is downright brutal. Let's just say that figure skating has never been huge in the Netherlands compared to speed skating or hockey, but the Dutch media never missed an opportunity to kick figure skating when it was down, which appeared to be almost all the time. Anyway, all of the results have been personally verified, the tables should be properly formatted, as should the citations. Pinging User:Drmies for no other reason than he's Dutch and has helped me out in the past. Please let me know if you have any comments or suggestions, and I look forward to your constructive feedback. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:04, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

[edit]

Here shall be an image review from me! Arconning (talk) 11:32, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • File:Challenge Cup logo.png - Fair use
  • File:European 2011 Boyito MULDER.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0, can't seem to access the website
  • File:Niki Wories - 2018 Autumn Classic - 3.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0, can't seem to access the website
  • File:2020 European Figure Skating Championships Daria Danilova Michel Tsiba 2020 01 22 3809.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Chelsea Verhaegh & Sherim Van Geffen 2025 Worlds Rhythm Dance 04.jpg - CC BY 4.0
  • File:Karen Venhuizen 2007 Nebelhorn Trophy.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0, can't seem to access the website
  • File:2024 Skate Canada – Danilova & Tsiba – short program 01.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • All of the images have alt-text for accessibility, proper captioning, and are relevant to the article.
User:Arconning: I have added archive links for all of the images you noted except for Ms. Venhuizen, which was not available. Same situation as with the Romanian article recently. So, Ms. Venhuizen went Doei, Felicia. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:15, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Pass. Arconning (talk) 14:59, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

User:ChrisTheDude: The one paragraph was out of place; I've relocated it. Bgsu98 (Talk) 09:50, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Vestrian24Bio

[edit]
Source review
[edit]

This table lists all 24 passages in the article (containing 60 inline citations from 24 unique sources). Generated with the Veracity user script. Vestrian24Bio 11:12, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reference # Letter Source Archive Status Notes
History
Figure skating in the Netherlands has historically never held the same popularity as ice hockey and speed skating.
1 resolver.kb.nl ✅
A lack of training facilities, certified coaches, and funding from the Royal Dutch Skating Federation (KNSB) led to decades of poor turnout and relatively poor results from Dutch figure skaters.
2 resolver.kb.nl ✅
3 resolver.kb.nl ✅
4 resolver.kb.nl ✅
While skating competitions had been held in the Netherlands prior to 1950,
5 "Skating Around the World" (PDF). Skating. Vol. 26, no. 2. December 1948. p. 16. Archived (PDF) fro… magazinearchive.blob.core.win… ✅
official national championships were not recognized until 1950.
6 a resolver.kb.nl ✅
Likewise, competitions in ice dance did not achieve championship status until 1956.
7 a resolver.kb.nl ✅
In 1959, plans were made to build an artificial ice rink in Amsterdam, but they were scrapped when the funds could not be raised. Only after a Dutch skater won the World Speed Skating Championships in 1961 were the necessary funds allocated. "Without an artificial ice rink in the Netherlands, it is impossible to ... sustain international competitive skating," Mr. H.W. Vliegen, chairperson of the KNSB, said at the time.
8 resolver.kb.nl ✅
Figure skaters had limited access to ice compared to hockey players, speed skaters, and recreational skaters.
9 resolver.kb.nl ✅
10 a resolver.kb.nl ✅
In 1981, there were 24 skating clubs comprising approximately 900 members, and only 20 ice rinks in the entirety of the Netherlands.
11 resolver.kb.nl ✅
Many of the Netherlands' most successful skaters were the children of Dutch emigrants who had moved to Canada or the United States. They lived and trained in North America, but returned to the Netherlands once a year to compete at the national championships.
12 resolver.kb.nl ✅
In some cases, this led to feelings of resentment among those who lived and trained in the Netherlands with fewer available resources and less access to ice.
13 resolver.kb.nl ✅
Media outlets often emphasized that these competitors lacked the ability to communicate in Dutch.
14 resolver.kb.nl ✅
15 resolver.kb.nl ✅
Since 2017, the Dutch Championships have been contested as part of the International Challenge Cup, the marquee figure skating competition of the Netherlands. The top Dutch competitors at this competition are recognized as the Dutch national champions.
16 isu-d8g8b4b7ece7aphs.a03.azur… web.archive.org ✅
17 schaatsen.nl web.archive.org ✅
No championships were held in 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
18 a isu.org web.archive.org ✅
While the International Challenge Cup was held for several years in The Hague, the competition was relocated in 2023 to Tilburg.
19 a knsbfigureskatingresults.nl web.archive.org ✅
Senior medalists
Although competitions in ice dance were held concurrently with the Dutch Figure Skating Championships prior to 1956, the ice dance event was not elevated to championship status until 1956.
7 c resolver.kb.nl ✅
Notes
Arnoud Hendriks did not achieve the minimum required score to be named the Dutch Champion.
29 a resolver.kb.nl ✅
Neither of the competitors in the men's event achieved the minimum required score to be named the Dutch Champion.
34 a resolver.kb.nl ✅
Rob Ouwerkerk did not achieve the minimum required score to be named the Dutch Champion.
37 a resolver.kb.nl ✅
Ed van Campen did not achieve the minimum required score to be named the Dutch Champion.
42 a resolver.kb.nl ✅
None of the women achieved the minimum required score to be named the Dutch Champion.
29 c resolver.kb.nl ✅
Although competitions in ice dance were held concurrently with the Dutch Figure Skating Championships prior to 1956, the ice dance event was not elevated to championship status until 1956.
7 d resolver.kb.nl ✅
Gerard van Hattem did not achieve the minimum required score to be named the Dutch Junior Champion.
37 d resolver.kb.nl ✅
Alex Vrancken did not achieve the minimum required score to be named the Dutch Junior Champion.
95 a resolver.kb.nl ✅
No text found: citation may be in an infobox or table
6 b resolver.kb.nl ✅
6 c resolver.kb.nl ✅
7 b resolver.kb.nl ✅
7 e resolver.kb.nl ✅
10 b resolver.kb.nl ✅
10 c resolver.kb.nl ✅
10 d resolver.kb.nl ✅
10 e resolver.kb.nl ✅
18 b isu.org web.archive.org ✅
18 c isu.org web.archive.org ✅
18 d isu.org web.archive.org ✅
18 e isu.org web.archive.org ✅
18 f isu.org web.archive.org ✅
18 g isu.org web.archive.org ✅
19 b knsbfigureskatingresults.nl web.archive.org ✅
19 c knsbfigureskatingresults.nl web.archive.org ✅
19 d knsbfigureskatingresults.nl web.archive.org ✅
19 e knsbfigureskatingresults.nl web.archive.org ✅
19 f knsbfigureskatingresults.nl web.archive.org ✅
29 b resolver.kb.nl ✅
29 d resolver.kb.nl ✅
29 e resolver.kb.nl ✅
34 b resolver.kb.nl ✅
34 c resolver.kb.nl ✅
37 b resolver.kb.nl ✅
37 c resolver.kb.nl ✅
37 e resolver.kb.nl ✅
37 f resolver.kb.nl ✅
42 b resolver.kb.nl ✅
42 c resolver.kb.nl ✅
95 b resolver.kb.nl ✅
95 c resolver.kb.nl ✅
Source review: pass. Vestrian24Bio 11:12, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Might be better to add archives to resolver.kb.nl sources. Vestrian24Bio 11:14, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
That source will not archive properly. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:21, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Other comments
[edit]
  • Ice dance is linked twice in the History section - 1st & 4th paragraphs.
  • Add an appropriate ENGVAR template to the page.
  • Check |url-status= in ref 87 (para should only be used when there's an archive link).

Vestrian24Bio 11:12, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Cillian Murphy on stage and screen

[edit]
Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk 20:56, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it provides an exhaustive list of Cillian Murphy's roles on stage and screen as well as other performances in music videos. I largely modeled this list after a filmography of Robin Williams which was my first to be promoted to featured list status. Comments are welcome. Birdienest81talk 20:56, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "He later made his feature film debut as a bartender in the Irish in the Irish drama"
  • "Murphy and Walsh would continue to collaborate" => "Murphy and Walsh continued to collaborate" per MOS:WOULDCHUCK
  • "Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man (2026), of which he also co-produced" => "Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man (2026), which he also co-produced"
  • Titles starting with "A" or "The" should sort based on the next word in the title
  • Roles where the character has a surname should sort based on the surname, not the forename
  • Notes and ref columns should not be sortable
  • Venue column being sortable in the theatre column is also probably of minimal usefulness
  • That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:51, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • @ChrisTheDude: - Done: I have read your comments and everything should look exactly how it is based on your feedback.
--Birdienest81talk 20:19, 11 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

[edit]
  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Three of the column headers in each table are missing scopes.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 19:44, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Prince of Zhou (Ming dynasty)

[edit]
Nominator(s): Min968 (talk) 05:57, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Princedom of Zhou, one of the princely domains of the Ming dynasty, produced two princes renowned for their achievements in poetry, drama, calligraphy, and medicine. Min968 (talk) 05:57, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

[edit]

Cell color cannot be the only means of conveying information. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:56, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgsu98 Fixed. Min968 (talk) 20:17, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1969

[edit]
Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:20, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

With 1968 having a bunch of supports, let's see if we can complete the decade :-) Number ones of 1969 include the only official Beatles single on which someone else got a featured credit, a smash hit by some characters from Riverdale, and a really weird song about the potential future extermination of mankind. As ever, feedback will be most gratefully received and swiftly acted upon...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:20, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Bgsu98 (6/8/26)

[edit]
  • Same comment about The Beatles from the previous article.

User:ChrisTheDude: No other issues with the prose. Bgsu98 (Talk) 09:06, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

NØ

[edit]
  • "During the year, 17 different singles spent time at number one ... In the year's first issue of Billboard" - That's two "the year"s in succession so maybe the new paragraph could open with writing out 1969
  • Is there usually a release year included in parenthesis after a musical's name (Hair)? That could be something you consider adding
  • "The group's first number one was replaced in the peak position by "Get Back" by The Beatles with Billy Preston" - I think "and" might suit this construction more than "with"
  • "Despite this success" - While objectively the song is successful, "success" can be omitted from this sentence without much detriment to readers' understanding, for added neutrality in wikivoice
  • Single inverted commas for song titles in the titles of refs 9 and 13
  • Great work, as usual!--NØ 16:28, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support--NØ 00:08, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dank

[edit]
  • File:The Supremes 1966.JPG: all 3 source links are broken. If you can't find a link, is there a way to prove that it passed some kind of previous review?
  • Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
  • Checking the FLC criteria:
  • 1. Nothing is jumping out at me as a prose problem. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the table links.
  • 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
  • 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
  • 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, and it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find).
  • 4. It is navigable.
  • 5. It meets style requirements. I only see the one image-license problem.
  • 6. It is stable. - Dank (push to talk) 20:19, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support, provisional on a clean source review. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 10:58, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Vestrian24Bio

[edit]
Source review
[edit]

This table lists all 17 passages in the article (containing 19 inline citations from 15 unique sources). Generated with the Veracity user script. Vestrian24Bio 11:26, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reference # Letter Source Archive Status Notes
The Billboard Hot 100 is a chart published since August 1958 by Billboard magazine which ranks the best-performing singles in the United States.
1 a Whitburn 2005, p. xii. ✅
In 1969, it was compiled based on a combination of sales and airplay data sourced from surveys of retail outlets and playlists submitted by radio stations respectively.
1 b Whitburn 2005, p. xii. ✅
In 1969's first issue of Billboard, "I Heard It Through the Grapevine" by Marvin Gaye was at number one, retaining its position from the final chart of 1968.
2 a billboard.com web.archive.org ✅
In February, Sly & the Family Stone topped the chart for the first time with "Everyday People";
3 Whitburn 2005, p. 65. ✅
the 5th Dimension achieved the same feat in April with "Medley: Aquarius/Let the Sunshine In (The Flesh Failures)", from the soundtrack of the stage musical Hair (1967).
4 Whitburn 2005, p. 242. ✅
The medley topped the Hot 100 for six consecutive weeks, one of two singles during the year to spend six weeks at number one. The 5th Dimension returned to the top spot in November with "Wedding Bell Blues" and was one of only two acts to take more than one single to number one during the year; their total of nine weeks in the top spot was the most achieved by any act in 1969. The group's first number one was replaced in the peak position by "Get Back" by the Beatles with Billy Preston. Other than two re-issued singles on which the Beatles had acted as the backing band for the singer Tony Sheridan prior to their rise to fame, "Get Back" is the only Hot 100 entry on which another musician received joint credit with the band.
5 Whitburn 2005, pp. 44–46. ✅
It was the 17th number one for the Beatles but the first appearance on the Hot 100 for Preston, who went on to achieve two solo chart-toppers.
6 Whitburn 2005, pp. 46, 562. ✅
Five more acts gained their first Hot 100 number ones between June and December. The arranger and orchestra leader Henry Mancini, who had regularly charted during the 1960s with film and television themes, reached number one for the first time with "Love Theme from Romeo and Juliet", taken from the 1968 film adaptation of the Shakespeare play directed by Franco Zeffirelli.
7 Whitburn 2005, pp. 436–437. ✅
Zager and Evans spent six weeks at number one in July and August with "In the Year 2525 (Exordium and Terminus)", tying for the year's longest-running chart-topper. Despite this, it was the only single which the duo ever placed on the Hot 100, leaving them viewed as a one-hit wonder.
8 Whitburn 2005, p. 785, 990. ✅
9 stereogum.com web.archive.org ✅
In September, "Sugar, Sugar" was the first Hot 100 number one for the Archies.
10 a Whitburn 2005, p. 23. ✅
The group was a fictional one consisting of characters from the animated television series The Archie Show, based on the comic books published by Archie Comics;
10 b Whitburn 2005, p. 23. ✅
the male and female vocals on the record were provided by the session singers Ron Dante and Toni Wine respectively.
10 c Whitburn 2005, p. 23. ✅
In December, Steam reached number one for the first and only time with "Na Na Hey Hey Kiss Him Goodbye" and Peter, Paul and Mary did the same with "Leaving on a Jet Plane".
11 Whitburn 2005, pp. 544, 675. ✅
The year's final number one was "Someday We'll Be Together" by Diana Ross & the Supremes. Although officially the final Supremes single to feature Diana Ross as lead vocalist before she departed for a solo career, it was itself effectively a Ross solo single, as the other members of the Supremes, Mary Wilson and Cindy Birdsong, did not perform on it, being replaced by session singers.
12 Lazell, Rees & Crampton 1989, p. 496. ✅
13 stereogum.com web.archive.org ✅
Chart history
"Suspicious Minds" was the final Hot 100 number one for Elvis Presley.
14 Whitburn 2005, pp. 560, 561. ✅
The "No." column indicates the numerical sequence of number ones in Hot 100 history.
15 Whitburn 2005, p. 988. ✅
No text found: citation may be in an infobox or table
2 b billboard.com web.archive.org ✅
Source review: pass. Vestrian24Bio 11:26, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Other comments
[edit]

Vestrian24Bio 11:26, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Vestrian24Bio: - done this one too :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:34, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
All good then, Support. Vestrian24Bio 13:36, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Camilasdandelions

[edit]
  • Archive all sources; just copy the source's link and paste it in here. Then you'll see the archived link(s) of it, choose anything and then copy and paste it to |archive-url=. Add archived dates on |archive-date= and don't forget to add |url-status=live
  • Use {{cite magazine}} because Billboard is a magazine
  • "The Beatles returned to number one in November with the double A-sided single "Come Together" / "Something" and were the second act with more than one number one during 1969." -- Is this supported by the Ref 7 or?
  • Reduce some commas on "it was itself effectively a Ross solo single, as the other members of the Supremes, Mary Wilson and Cindy Birdsong, did not perform on it, being replaced by session singers." -> "it was effectively a Ross solo single, as Mary Wilson and Cindy Birdsong did not perform on it and were replaced by session singers."
    • I ditched some commas but worded it slightly differently so as to make it 100% clear to the average reader that the two ladies in question were the (sole) other members of the Supremes -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:50, 19 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Here're the appropriate alts for the images:
    • A black-and-white photograph of the musical group the Supremes performing on stage with a backing band
    • A black-and-white close-up portrait of a smiling Billy Preston with a prominent afro hairstyle and beard
    • A black-and-white promotional headshot of Henry Mancini wearing a classic tuxedo and bow tie
    • A black-and-white photograph of the three members of the Supremes sitting together indoors
    • A black-and-white promotional photograph of Elvis Presley posing in a striped shirt and dark jacket in front of a jail cell backdrop
  • That's all I see. Camilasdandelions (✉️) 12:47, 19 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Monuments of national significance in Chernivtsi Oblast

[edit]
Nominator(s): Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 18:36, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List #4 of the Ukrainian monuments of national significance series. Chernivtsi Oblast is the smallest oblast by area and population, and is on the whole quite rural, which is reflected by the many inscribed vernacular-style churches (PS: perhaps too many; I'm not convinced that they are all nationally important). The obvious highlights are the Residence of Metropolitans (the first World Heritage Site of the series) and the Khotyn Fortress. Same structure as the previous lists, and this time I've prepared a Q&A that covers some old questions as well as other possible issues. Thank you in advance for reviewing. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 18:36, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Bgsu98 (6/8/26)

[edit]

No issues with the prose.

Table

User:Shwabb1: Really just the one question. I know the issue with photos displaying is not with this article, but probably with my browser. Bgsu98 (Talk) 09:16, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgsu98: Thank you for the comments. I've replied in line. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 14:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography

[edit]
Nominator(s): GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 23:33, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the featured list criteria, and that if it doesn't, it can be made to meet those criteria. GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 23:33, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

[edit]
  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Title becomes !scope=col | Title.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1 becomes !scope=row | 1 (on its own line).
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
  • The image in the infobox should have alt-text.
  • The refs column should be unsortable.
  • The authors column needs to be sortable based on the last name.

(please Reply to icon mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:22, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Most of this seems technical and I'll work it out. The main concern I have is sorting by last names. Multiple publications have multiple authors; how should that be handled? GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 06:14, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Added a table caption for screen readers.
  • Added column scopes.
  • Added row scopes.
  • Ref column is unsortable.
  • Opened talk page discussion on Template talk:Infobox book series about how to add alt-text. I don't see an option on this template, and might need one added.
  • Waiting for clarification on author last name.
GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 06:42, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Added alt text for image in infobox.
GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 06:56, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • I looked at the current FL nominations and found List of accolades received by the Before trilogy which sorts based on last name of the first person when there are multiple in a cell.
  • Usually leads in newer FLs have 2-3 paragraphs of text. See if you can move some/all of the content from the history section.
  • You referred to them as publications in a few places. Any problem with calling them books?
  • See if you can change/eliminate the sentence in the lead which has "may have".
  • A 1-line description of the concepts covered in each book would be nice as a new column in the table.
  • This is a British publication. Why is the rate given in dollars?
  • Unless there is a particular reason, I suggest that you keep the see-also links normal sized.
  • The navigation template can be removed since this page isn't included in it (WP:BIDIRECTIONAL).
  • Do remember to ping reviewers once you have taken care of all of their comments. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:05, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Grade I listed buildings in Oxford

[edit]
Nominator(s): KJP1 (talk) 12:52, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The wealth and importance of the University of Oxford, the oldest in the English-speaking world, has given the city a rich built heritage. This includes 199 buildings designated Grade I, the highest grading awarded by Historic England. Structures include works by some of the most prominent architects from the 17th to the 20th centuries; including Sir Christopher Wren, Nicholas Hawksmoor, James Gibbs, William Burges, William Butterfield, Edwin Lutyens and Arne Jacobsen. This list details those buildings; with matched entries, either articles or sections of articles, and notes for every listing, and a complete set of images with alt text. I want to express my thanks to User:TSventon, who gave valuable advice and encouragement, and User:Jonathan A Jones, who performed miracles to obtain the full set of images. Comments and suggestions for improvement would be equally gratefully received. KJP1 (talk) 12:52, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan620

[edit]

I love architecture. I'm calling dibs on an image review, though it may take me a couple days given the sheer number of images. (Disclaimer: this review, when complete, will be used in the 2026 WikiCup.) Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 20:44, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry about the length of the list, it is a bit daunting! It's partly to do with the city's rich architectural heritage; but it is also partly to do with the how the Ministry of Works, Historic England's predecessor, decided to go about listing at the time. Largely, they assigned listed building status separately to each range of a college quadrangle so that, for example, the two quads of Jesus College have a total of nine listings. They didn't follow this approach at Cambridge so, for example, all of the buildings surrounding the Fore and Principal Courts at Clare College have a single listing. The differing approaches partly account for why Oxford has nearly three times as many Grade I listings as Cambridge. KJP1 (talk) 07:08, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Just dropping a quick note that I haven't forgotten about this! There are some things I've needed to take care of IRL and I've been mostly looking at the images in small chunks. I'm down to Pembroke College now, and so far I've found no issues. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 13:01, 18 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. It is a long list. Pleased no issues have arisen so far. KJP1 (talk) 15:53, 18 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
So I did find one minor issue as I worked my way further down the list (File:At Oxford 2024 011.jpg lacks a description), but everything looks good otherwise:
KJP1, thank you for your work on this article and for your patience. Once the minor quibble is addressed, I look forward to supporting. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 13:31, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Dylan620 - Thanks are due to you, for taking on an image review of a list with 200 images. No small task. The issue you noted with (File:At Oxford 2024 011.jpg) actually uncovered two issues.
  • St John's College has two quads, Front and North which both have western frontages onto St Giles;
  • Our Commons Category, St John's College, West Range, Oxford doesn't make this distinction;
  • The ranges (West Range Front Quad NHLE 1046647) and (West Block North Quad NHLE 1183676) look quite similar, both being three-storey ranges with central castellated gate-houses. However, the gate-house details differ, and the West Range of Front Quad is fronted by a low retaining wall;
  • Both are also listed, but the North Quad west block is only Grade II;
  • Regrettably, I used an image for the North Quad, rather than the Front Quad;
  • To compound the confusion, I note that the Historic England listing page has made the same mistake, [1]. I shall drop them an email;
  • I've now replaced the image with the right one. I've also added a description to the original file used, for completeness. Do let me know if anything needs clarifying. My sincere apologies for this. My thanks also to User: Jonathan A Jones for pointing it out.
My thanks again for the extensive review. Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 15:34, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
My pleasure, KJP1; the fixes look good to me, and I am pleased to support. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 20:38, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much for both the detailed review and for the support. KJP1 (talk) 10:14, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
This is not an FL problem, but I have split Commons:Category:St John's College, West Range, Oxford, and Commons:Category:St Johns College, West Block (Facing St Giles), Oxford. TSventon (talk) 18:54, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
TSventon - Many thanks. That was a necessary piece of housekeeping I overlooked. KJP1 (talk) 10:15, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Shwabb1

[edit]

Will review this. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 16:56, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated. Look forward to your comments. KJP1 (talk) 06:58, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, I haven't forgotten. I'll get to it in a few days... Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 22:35, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • In "The High - "one of the world's great streets" - ", aren't the hyphens supposed to be dashes?
  • Per MOS:DASHVAR, the space preceding an en dash has to be non-breaking (e.g., "Grade I – buildings" → "Grade I – buildings"; see code)
  • For "buildings of exceptional interest, only 2.5%" and "buildings of particular importance with more than special interest, 5.8% of listed buildings", I would replace the comma with a semicolon in each.
  • "The entire north and west of the county of Oxfordshire sits within the Jurassic belt and the county was famous for its building stone. In the medieval period stone quarrying was second only to the wool trade in terms of its economic importance to the county." disrupts the flow of the paragraph a bit and I'm not sure how important it is to mention in the lead. What would you say about moving these two sentences to a footnote?
  • In footnote d, "Nikolaus Pevsner's comment on their decision was;" should end with a colon.
  • Will look at the list itself later. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 23:00, 20 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks. I think I have actioned all of these but my understanding of the use of en/em dashes is very rudimentary. I've used unspaced em dashes for the Pevsner quote. Is this what was wanted? KJP1 (talk) 04:21, 21 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Unspaced em dashes can be used interchangeably with spaced en dashes (though in the latter case the first space has to be non-breaking per MOS:DASHVAR). En dashes should also be used for ranges between numbers and dates (MOS:RANGE). I've applied both fixes (and also my fifth point about the colon), and I'll look over the table again tomorrow and leave final comments. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 00:02, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing...

  • For "Balliol College, old library", I'm not sure if square brackets are allowed at "[see below]". MOS only mentions their use in quotations (I think), and while I can't find an explicit ban on their use elsewhere, I would replace them with regular brackets just in case.
  • To clarify, is "Exeter College, south-east range, Main Quadrangle" both a Grade I and Grade II* listed building?
  • For "St Catherine's College, master's house and garden wall to north", what's the purpose of "[..]" in the quote?
  • For "St Catherine's College, music house" and "wall 2m west of the music house", I'm assuming the wall is on the left of the picture and the house on the right, but this should probably be mentioned in the descriptions.
  • For "Ashmolean Museum and Taylor Institution", "museum/art gallery" should be changed to "museum and art gallery" per MOS:SLASH.
  • The "Completed" column does not sort properly; fix with sort templates. You can assign approximate values for structures not dated to specific years (e.g., 1650 for the 17th century).
  • The "Location" column may optionally be rowspanned where applicable.
  • I've applied some minor changes such as replacing instances of "c." with Template:circa; I hope you're fine with them though feel free to contest any of these. I'll go over the alt text tomorrow and that should be it. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 22:59, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

TSventon

[edit]

@KJP1: Apologies for a late comment, as you know Historic England omits apostrophes. I would add apostrophes as follows, but some of them are debatable. I am asking now because I have noticed that some St John's College categories in Commons are missing apostrophes. Of course you may prefer to follow Historic England in some or all cases.

  • Corpus Christi College, Fellows Building → Fellows' Building
  • Corpus Christi College, Gentlemen Commoners' Buildings (already done)
  • All Saints Church → All Saints' Church
  • Magdalen College, Founders Tower → Founder's Tower
  • Merton College, Fellows Quadrangle → Fellows' Quadrangle
  • St John's College, Cooks Building → Cook's Building TSventon (talk) 21:22, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No problem at all. I'm inclined to agree. The instances you cite should have apostrophes and I don't think we should be constrained by the fact that HE doesn't use them. I'll make the necessary amendments. KJP1 (talk) 10:17, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
And now done. KJP1 (talk) 10:24, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Couldn't pass up this one given that my son is currently a student at Oxford and one of these can be seen from his window.......

  • "The Medieval period" - pretty sure medieval doesn't need a capital M
  • "Granted city status in 1542 the city and university continued to expand" - the university wasn't granted city status, so maybe change to "Oxford was granted city status in 1542 and the city and university continued to expand"
  • "built to defend the town in 1226-1240" => "built to defend the town between 1226 and 1240"
  • There seems to be come inconsistent capitalisation. The official listing names seem to be capitalise almost every word, which is probably fine, but I'm not sure that in regular prose (i.e. the notes column) terms like "medieval kitchen" should be capitalised. I can also see "The west range" and "The East Range" in consecutive listings
  • "The Library, almost, closes Peckwater Quad on the southern side" - those commas are not needed
  • "Their plan was for two, three-range, quads" => "Their plan was for two three-range quads"
  • "By William Townesend, a prominent Oxford sculptor and architect, and dating from the 1730s." - this is a sentence fragment so should not have a full stop. This also applies to quite a few of the listings from this point on......
  • That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:17, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Chris, many thanks for these. Will get on to them later today. And congratulations to your son. KJP1 (talk) 05:44, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
ChrisTheDude - I have attempted to address your issues through a series of edits. I think, and hope, that almost all are now resolved. The issue I vacillated over was the capitalisation of quads. Initially, I decapitalised, as with kitchen, hall etc. But then, I reverted myself, as Front Quad, St John's College, seemed to warrant capitalisation as much as Canterbury Quad, St John's College. Let me know what you think. I am no MoS specialist, on this or any other point, and am quite happy to go with the prevailing view. KJP1 (talk) 20:24, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

[edit]
  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. For the {{EH listed building header}} header template you used, you can just add |caption=caption_text as a parameter.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 19:41, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    PresN - you kindly showed me how to do this for Grade I listed buildings in England completed in the 20th century, and I've tried to copy exactly what was done there, with a tweak to accommodate the five separate tables used here. If you had the chance to give it a once-over to see that I've done it correctly, I would greatly appreciate it. Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 15:37, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Looks good; captions don't have to be so long (e.g. just "University colleges" is fine), but what you have works as well. --PresN 18:59, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of Billboard Hot 100 number ones of 1968

[edit]
Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

With one of the other lists having just been promoted, here's the latest in this series. If you know Otis Redding from that song by Jay-Z and Kanye West that sampled him then read this article to learn about how he sadly became the first singer ever to have a posthumous number one....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

[edit]

Dank

[edit]
  • "After "Hello, Goodbye"'s spell at number one, the next six chart-toppers": Any objection to "After "Hello, Goodbye", the next six chart-toppers"? That seems to work to me.
  • Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
  • Checking the FLC criteria:
  • 1. Nothing else is jumping out at me as a prose problem. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the table links.
  • 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
  • 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
  • 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, and it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find).
  • 4. It is navigable.
  • 5. It meets style requirements. I don't see an image-license problem.
  • 6. It is stable.
  • Support, provisional on a clean source review. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 14:01, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

NØ

[edit]
  • "The British group held the top spot for the first two weeks of the new year ..." - I would probably go for "They held the top spot" or something similar as there does not seem to be significance of them being British to this chart feat
  • Do you think it might be useful to pipe the entire text of "John Fred and his Playboy Band" to John Fred? The article seems to be about the band just as much as the individual, so it might be helpful to clearly point to readers they can click the link to read about the band as well
  • "Goldsboro's "Honey" was a triple Billboard chart-topper, also reaching number one on both the Hot Country Singles and Easy Listening charts" - a bit nitpicky but it is a bit jarring to read "triple", followed by only two charts being named. How about "Goldsboro's "Honey" was a triple Billboard chart-topper, reaching number one on the Hot 100 as well as the Hot Country Singles and Easy Listening charts"
  • Ref 6 - I think it should be single inverted commas for "Love Is Blue" instead of double
  • Ref 14 - I think RS would go in italics in the title as short for Rolling Stone
  • Another great addition to the series. If you are interested, I have put up an FAC for a short song article. Regards.--NØ 16:33, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@MaranoFan: - many thanks for your review. All points should hopefully be addressed. I will take a look at your FAC before the weekend is out....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:04, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Bgsu98 (6/8/26)

[edit]
Lead
  • According to The Beatles, the "The" is part of their name and should be capitalized.
  • "They held the top spot for the first two weeks of the new year and then returned to number one in September with "Hey Jude", which spent nine weeks atop the chart, tying the record for the longest unbroken run at number one on the Hot 100, set by "Theme from A Summer Place" by Percy Faith in 1960." --> Holy run-on sentence, Batman! I would split that in half, at the very least.
  • "Alpert had topped Billboard's Easy Listening chart several times, but had never previously reached number one on the Hot 100."

User:ChrisTheDude: Let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 08:59, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgsu98: - done! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:14, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
That was easy. Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 09:19, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Camilasdandelions

[edit]

Vestrian24Bio

[edit]
Source review
[edit]

This table lists all 16 passages in the article (containing 17 inline citations from 15 unique sources). Generated with the Veracity user script. Vestrian24Bio 11:22, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reference # Letter Source Archive Status Notes
The Billboard Hot 100 is a chart published since August 1958 by Billboard magazine which ranks the best-performing singles in the United States.
1 a Whitburn 2005, p. xii. ✅
In 1968, it was compiled based on a combination of sales and airplay data sourced from surveys of retail outlets and playlists submitted by radio stations respectively.
1 b Whitburn 2005, p. xii. ✅
In the year's first issue of Billboard, the Beatles were at number one with "Hello, Goodbye", retaining the position from the final chart of 1967.
2 a billboard.com web.archive.org ✅
They held the top spot for the first two weeks of the new year and then returned to number one in September with "Hey Jude". The latter song spent nine weeks atop the chart, tying the record for the longest unbroken run at number one on the Hot 100, set by "Theme from A Summer Place" by Percy Faith in 1960.
3 Whitburn 2005, pp. 987–989. ✅
The two chart-toppers took the band's total to 16 in less than five years.
4 Whitburn 2005, pp. 44–46. ✅
The Beatles were the only act with more than one number one during 1968 and their total of 11 weeks in the peak position during the year was more than twice that achieved by any other act. After "Hello, Goodbye", the next six chart-toppers were all by acts reaching number one for the first time: John Fred and his Playboy Band, the Lemon Pipers, Paul Mauriat, Otis Redding, Bobby Goldsboro, and Archie Bell & the Drells.
5 Whitburn 2005, pp. 49, 265, 283, 405, 452, 582. ✅
Mauriat's "Love Is Blue", the first Hot 100 number one by a French act, was an instrumental version of "L'amour est bleu", performed by Vicky Leandros in the 1967 Eurovision Song Contest.
6 stereogum.com web.archive.org ✅
Redding, who had died in an airplane crash in December 1967, was the first artist to achieve a number one posthumously when "(Sittin' On) The Dock of the Bay" reached the top spot three months later.
7 americansongwriter.com web.archive.org ✅
Goldsboro's "Honey" was a triple Billboard chart-topper, reaching number one on both the Hot Country Singles and Easy Listening charts in addition to the Hot 100.
8 Whitburn 1996, p. 128. ✅
9 Whitburn 2002, p. 104. ✅
Despite this success, it was the only top 10 entry he achieved on the Hot 100.
10 Whitburn 2005, p. 283. ✅
Four more acts gained their first Hot 100 number ones during the second half of the year: Herb Alpert, Hugh Masekela, Jeannie C. Riley, and Marvin Gaye.
11 Whitburn 2005, pp. 14, 272, 273, 448, 593. ✅
Alpert had topped Billboard's Easy Listening chart several times, but had never previously reached number one on the Hot 100. Similarly, Gaye had achieved four previous number ones on the magazine's R&B chart,
12 Whitburn 2004, p. 226. ✅
but "I Heard It Through the Grapevine" was his first single to achieve sufficient pop crossover to top the Hot 100.
13 Whitburn 2005, p. 272, 273. ✅
It is one of several 1968 number ones to have been included on Rolling Stone magazine's list of the 500 Greatest Songs of All Time; in 2004, the magazine ranked "Hey Jude" at number 8, "(Sittin' On) The Dock of the Bay" at number 28, and "I Heard It Through the Grapevine" at number 80.
14 rollingstone.com web.archive.org ✅
Chart history
The "No." column indicates the numerical sequence of number ones in Hot 100 history.
15 Whitburn 2005, p. 988. ✅
No text found: citation may be in an infobox or table
2 b billboard.com web.archive.org ✅
Source review: pass. Vestrian24Bio 11:22, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Other comments
[edit]

Vestrian24Bio 11:22, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Vestrian24Bio: - done! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:32, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
All good then, Support.
If you could take a look at my FLC nom (Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of 2026 Indian Premier League personnel changes/archive1) as well. Vestrian24Bio 13:34, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of gerbillines

[edit]
Nominator(s): PresN 02:10, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey y'all, mammal list #77 in our perpetual series and rodent list #22: Gerbillinae. This is our second of three lists working through the subfamilies of the last family in this series, the giant family of Muridae. The subfamily Gerbillinae includes the gerbils, jirds, and sand rats. With 102 species in Africa and Asia, it's still a reasonable size, which is foreshadowing for the last species list in this series. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 02:10, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reconrabbit

[edit]

Good to see more rodent nominations from you. I did a search for usable images on iNaturalist. Tangentially related I was able to find this website, eGerbil (archived) which has since been usurped by a gambling site but has an amazing animated header image. The image of the pleasant gerbil is of dubious identification since this species isn't necessarily present in Morocco at all, but it is sold as a pet in some places. Will work on this later, probably with an image review. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 18:55, 5 June 2026 (UTC) Image review below. Linked items have problems.[reply]

  • All images have alt text.
  • Images that are described as "own work" and are presumed to be correctly attributed with usable licenses:
    • File:Emin's Gerbil.jpg, File:Sekeetamys calurus.JPG, File:Rhombomys opimus 1.jpg, File:Fat sand rat.jpg, File:Pachyuromys-duprasi PeterMaas.jpg, File:Meriones tristrami - full body.jpg, File:Meriones persicus.jpg, File:Meriones meridianus in Mongolia (cropped).jpg, File:Libyan Jird.jpg, File:Indian Desert Jird.jpeg, File:מריון חולות בנגב הצפוני, צילום- אנדרה זערור.jpg, File:Gerbillus dasyurus.jpg, File:Perpallidus.jpg, File:Gerbillus pyramidum Museum de Genève.JPG, File:Cheesman's Gerbil 2.JPG, File:Gerbilliscus kempi SierraLeone.jpg, File:Gerbilliscus brantsii Distribution.png
  • Images from iNaturalist or Flickr:
    • File:Meriones tamariscinus 259506815.jpg, File:Sundevall's Jird, Bechar, Béchar, Algérie imported from iNaturalist photo 265557363.jpg, File:Shaw's Jird, El Achir, Algérie imported from iNaturalist photo 261672326.jpg, File:Meriones grandis - Михаил Голомысов - 622844816.jpeg, File:Meriones unguiculatus (wild).jpg, File:King Jird, Ahad Rafidah Saudi Arabia imported from iNaturalist photo 260302363.jpg, File:Meriones arimalius 479598443 (cropped).jpg, File:Riggenbach's Gerbil, Oued el Dahab, EH imported from iNaturalist photo 478112274.jpg, File:Pygmy Gerbil imported from iNaturalist photo 260302397 on 14 February 2024.jpg, File:Gerbillus amoenus - Demian Hiß - 600595834.jpeg, File:Gerbillus gerbillus 242402179 1.jpg, File:Gerbillus hoogstraali.jpg, File:Highveld Gerbil, Klippan, Eastvaal District Council, South Africa imported from iNaturalist photo 23046283.jpg, File:Hairy-footed Gerbil, Benede Oranje, South Africa imported from iNaturalist photo 169574421.jpg, File:Gerbilliscus afer.jpg, File:Gerbilliscus leucogaster 228171969.jpg, File:Gerbilliscus nigricaudus - Stephanie Dolrenry - 152876571.jpeg, File:Gerbillus cheesmani 327698887.jpg
  • Public domain images:
    • File:Gerbillus watersi 1901.jpg, File:Gerbillus simoni.jpg, File:Gerbillus burtoni.jpg, File:GerbillusNanus.jpg, File:Brachiones.jpg
  • Properly licensed maps:
    • File:Gerbillus campestris distribution.png, File:Gerbillus gerbillus distribution.png
  • Other images:
    • File:Desmodillus auricularis.jpg
  • Images that have no evidence of permission or other problems:

Please review the above... I think only the map is trivially fixable, the other two images with problems are probably easier to remove than figure out what's going on with their provenance. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 20:32, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm out of town for a few days; I've dropped all three images for now, and when I get back home I'll probably make a replacement for the map. --PresN 02:11, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Bgsu98 (6/9/26)

[edit]

Holy cow, that's a lot of gerbils! Don't tell Richard Gere...

  • You have Sudan wikilinked next to Khartoum gerbil, when it has appeared several times previously, and was presumably wikilinked at its first appearance.

User:PresN: I'll go ahead and support now since that is a quick and easy fix, and was the only issue I found. Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:19, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks for reviewing! --PresN 15:35, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Older nominations

[edit]

List of 2026 Indian Premier League personnel changes

[edit]
Nominator(s): Vestrian24Bio 10:56, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am back with a list from the recently concluded 2026 Indian Premier League; I formatted the page based on the 2025 list which I took to FL earlier this year. Vestrian24Bio 10:56, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "third most expensive player in the history of IPL" => "third most expensive player in the history of the IPL"
  • "became the joint-most expensive uncapped players in the history of IPL" - same
  • "Meanwhile the 79 unsold players included players" => "The 79 unsold players included players"
  • "Right-to-Match (RTM) cards were not available for mini auction." - please explain "right-to-match" cards. The link just goes to the generic IPL article so that's not really much help.
  • "Any auctioned player withdrew before the 2025 season without legitimate reason or injury are banned" => "Any auctioned player who withdrew before the 2025 season without legitimate reason or injury are is banned"
  • "Ten sets of players divided based on their specialisation" => "Ten sets of players were divided based on their specialisation"
  • "batters, all-rounders, wicket keeper batters, fast bowlers and spin bowlers; and status: capped and uncapped went up for bidding first" - I don't understand which group(s) the last five words relate to
  • I don't understand the totals mentioned in the lead: 369 players were shortlisted, 77 were sold, and 79 were unsold. What happened to the other 113 players.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:43, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @ChrisTheDude
    • Removed RTM since it was not relevant to this season anyways.
    • Player groups: capped batters & uncapped batters, capped bowlers & uncapped bowlers etc.
    • Resolved the players count; only 156 were featured in the auction.
    All else done. Vestrian24Bio 11:10, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • I still don't understand this part "Ten sets of players were divided based on their specialisation: batters, all-rounders, wicket keeper batters, fast bowlers and spin bowlers; and status: capped and uncapped went up for bidding first" - who exactly went up for bidding first? It seems like there are some words missing...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:20, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @ChrisTheDude: this is the order they went up in
    1. Capped batters
    2. Capped all-rounders
    3. Capped wicket-keepers
    4. Capped fast bowlers
    5. Capped spin bowlers
    6. Uncapped batters
    7. Uncapped all-rounders
    8. Uncapped wicket-keepers
    9. Uncapped fast bowlers
    10. Uncapped spin bowlers
    I'm just not sure how to explain it all in a prose summary. Vestrian24Bio 11:34, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
In that case I would phrase it as "Ten sets of players were divided based on their specialisation: batters, all-rounders, wicket-keeper batters, fast bowlers and spin bowlers; and status: capped and uncapped. The capped players went up for bidding first followed by the uncapped players." -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:36, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrisTheDude: done. Vestrian24Bio 11:39, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of Left Democratic Front (Kerala) members

[edit]
Nominator(s): TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 05:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it satisfies the Featured List criteria. The list documents the composition and representation of the Left Democratic Front, which is one of Kerala's two major political alliances. The list covers constituent parties, electoral data, and historical changes in membership. TheGreatEditor024 (talk) 05:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

[edit]
  • Tables need captions,

which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.

  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. !Flag becomes !scope=col | Flag. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. |[[Communist Party of India (Marxist)]] becomes !scope=row | [[Communist Party of India (Marxist)]]. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 19:39, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Contents and sourcing

[edit]
  • Whilst superficially, the tables look nice, there is material that lacks proper sourcing. In "Ideology" column, the list seems to extract labels from article infoboxes, that are often arbitrary, dubious or unsourced. What ideology is "Anti-merger Group"? The notion that NCP would be "Gandhian Socialist" is quite dubious, the label "Manism" is weird, and so forth. The whole "Associate Members" section is a WP:OR invention. True, there are a number of parties that are not LDF members per se that the LDF allocated seats to contest (and even gets to have ministers in LDF govts), but there is no formal Associate Member status. And there is a difference between a party like INL (who gets to be part of seat sharing for elections, for multiple elections over many years) and MLPI(RF) who declares support for LDF from outside. --Soman (talk) 10:35, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the 1998 Pacific hurricane season

[edit]
Nominator(s): Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 16:16, 30 May 2026 (UTC) GiftedIceCream 21:20, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Next up in an ongoing series of hurricane season timeline nominations: that of the 1998 Pacific hurricane season. The season was somewhat below average by raw storm count, but an unusually high proportion of those storms became strong and/or long-lasting. Most systems fortunately stayed clear of land, though Isis hit Mexico as a minimal hurricane, and the remnants of Madeline contributed to disastrous flooding in Texas.

I will endeavour to address any concerns as quickly as I can. GiftedIceCream, who chipped in quite a bit here while I was away, is invited to sign on as a co-nom. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 16:16, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

TheNuggeteer

[edit]

Will perform a source review. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 03:31, 20 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Activity during the season was fairly average" according to who? please cite 1998 monthly weather review at the end of this
    Restructured a bit, citations added. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 14:35, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • The pages and volume of source 3 do not seem correct
    Fixed. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 14:35, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Prevailing atmospheric currents steered the vast majority of storms out to sea" where is this in the source?
    Quoting from MWR: Most of the tropical storms and hurricanes remained away from land on climatologically favored tracks toward the west-northwest. Prevailing steering resulted from a persistent 50-mb anticyclone located over the western United States. This feature persisted throughout most of the summer. A few tropical cyclones threatened Baja California during short periods when the strong anticyclone weakened. In most of these cases, however, the anticyclone reestablished itself and steered the storms to the west-northwest before they reached Baja California. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 14:35, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • You forgot to put the citation of source 12 on June 30 00:00 UTC
    Added. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 14:35, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Will continue later.

  • July 17: "6:00" should be changed to "06:00"
  • Same issue on July 20 and 21
  • Same with Lester's dissipation
  • CS1-maint error in source 24
    See above. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 14:35, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • 00:00 UTC on October 17 shows that it actually dissipated, which is not consistent with the others that you place in the six hours before dissipation.
    The TCR says dissipating, indicating that it was on its last legs but still a tropical cyclone at the time. This is reflected in HURDAT, which maintains Kay as a tropical depression at 0z on the 17th. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 14:35, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The review is now finished; this is a really nice article! @Dylan620 and GiftedIceCream: ping. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 10:24, 20 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the review, TheNuggeteer. I think I've gotten everything. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 14:35, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricanehink

[edit]
  • Quick drive-by comment. Is there a reason you're not naming the tropical depressions, like 1-E, etc? I see you do it for the TD's that didn't intensify. I get not doing it for Celia, Howard, or Isis, since advisories began on it as a TS. But when you have multiple storms, like when Kay weakened to a TD and a new TD formed that became Madeline, it might be a bit confusing which one is which.
    My understanding is that it has been standard practice to only include the number of each tropical depression if it was explicitly mentioned in the TCR. For instance, Beryl of the 2024 Atlantic season was operationally designated as Tropical Depression Two when it formed, but the TCR never calls the incipient depression TD 2, just "a tropical depression", so the timeline bit for Beryl's formation was edited accordingly. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 20:33, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • The lead talks about how the timeline mentions extratropical transitions, but it doesn't appear there were any this season.
    This was from the boilerplate, but I take your point. Removed. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 20:33, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • I feel like somewhere in the lead should mention/link the Saffir-Simpson scale so it doesn't appear for the first time in Blas's section.
    I converted the footnote about major hurricanes into prose to address this. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 20:33, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Make sure refs are in order, for example, ref 15 was before ref 4.
    Thanks for catching; fixed. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 20:33, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is it worth specifying Howard's peak on August 23rd being the strongest storm for the whole season?
    Couldn't hurt; I have done this in previous timelines. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 20:33, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The article is decent, so no major issues here. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:08, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback, Hurricanehink; replies inline. Dylan620 (he/they/she • talk • edits) 20:33, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of international goals scored by Dimitar Berbatov

[edit]
Nominator(s): TNM101 (chat) 17:37, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

My first time nominating any article for either GA or FA/FL, would gladly accept any feedback on improving the list TNM101 (chat) 17:37, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • Image caption needs a full stop
  • "He subsequently went on to make 78 appearances for the national team and was the captain from 2006 until May 2010.[2][3] Until his retirement in May 2010, he scored 48 goals and finished as the country's joint all-time top scorer with Hristo Bonev" - this would read better as "He subsequently went on to make 78 appearances for the national team and was the captain from 2006 until his retirement in May 2010.[2][3] He scored 48 goals and finished as the country's joint all-time top scorer with Hristo Bonev"
  • "He scored his first goal for the Trikolyorite" - nickname should be in quote marks, not italics
  • "in a 2–3 friendly loss to Chile" => "in a 3–2 friendly loss to Chile"
  • "Despite appearing in 24 FIFA World Cup qualifiers for the 2002, 2006, and 2010 editions, he was not able to guide the nation to the competition proper since their last appearance in 1998." => "Despite appearing in 24 FIFA World Cup qualifiers for the 2002, 2006, and 2010 editions, he was not able to guide the nation to the competition proper, in which they had last appeared in 1998."
  • "He appeared at UEFA Euro 2004, where he made 3 appearances" => "He appeared at UEFA Euro 2004, where he made three appearances"
  • "This would be the only major tournament that he would play in for Bulgaria" => "This was the only major tournament that he played in for Bulgaria"
  • "After retiring at 29, many believed that he lacked the motivation and drive to impel a weak squad and that his performances for the team were sometimes too "languid" or laid back" - people only thought this after he retired? Nobody thought it while he was playing?
Reworded this TNM101 (chat)

Drive-by comment

[edit]

Marina Diamandis discography

[edit]
Nominator(s): Is it Juan? (talk) 05:13, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, if you were truly in your Tumblr girl era in the early 2010s, then you would know that this iconic name is not actually a backing band, and is without any doubt referring to her established fans. Of course, I am clearly talking about the Welsh indie-pop singer Marina Diamandis, formerly known as Marina and the Diamonds (and sometimes by her stamped black heart-on-cheek alter ego, Electra Heart).

I am nominating her discography article for featured list because she been in the game for nearly two decades, where her music has inspired many artists, notably being Billie Eilish, Kim Petras and Slayyyter. Furthermore, Diamandis has been more outspoken with her social and political views in recent albums, while attributing her status as a gay icon to her 1970s campness and sense of humour, proven to be seen through Ancient Dreams in a Modern Land (2021). This is the same album I actually first listened to from her, which dove me into a massive rabbit hole in her previous work, coming in to fix any issues that were made by others in the past.

As of right now, I have tried my best to rewrite this whole extensive page, adding and archiving any correct sources, believing that it fits the criteria. Hopefully you join in and help an editor out with your constructive comments! Thanks. Is it Juan? (talk) 05:13, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Prose comments

[edit]
  • "she independently released her first extended play, Mermaid vs Sailor, and was distributed via her official profile" - she wasn't distributed, so it should be "she independently released her first extended play, Mermaid vs Sailor, which was distributed via her official profile".
    • Done.
  • "U.S. independent label Neon Gold Records would eventually release" => "U.S. independent label Neon Gold Records eventually released".
    • Done.
  • "Subsequently, she would signed onto 679 Recordings" => "Subsequently, she was signed by 679 Recordings".
    • Done.
  • The article is/should be written in British English and we do not use dots in "UK".
  • "second studio album titled,[5] Electra Heart, " - no reason for that comma.
    • Done.
  • "released in 27 April 2012." => "released on 27 April 2012."
    • Done.
  • "Diamandis spent a couple months" => "Diamandis spent a couple of months".
    • Done.
  • "A boxed-set, [..] were issued" => "A boxed-set, [..] was issued".
    • Done.
  • "The songs were: "Froot", "Happy"," - no reason for that colon.
    • Done.
  • "soon it chart at number ten" => "soon it charted at number ten"
    • Done.
  • "She would then take a break on music" => "She then took a break from music".
    • Done.
  • "rather than her former stage name" - you haven't actually mentioned her former stage name in the prose (it's hidden in a footnote). I think it should be much more prominently mentioned, especially as it's the name that all her most successful music was released under.
    • Done; I've removed the footnote and tried to mention her stage name, let me know if it works like that.
      • It works, but rather than "The singer first created her former stage name Marina and the Diamonds in 2005,[1] where she had gone to perform as for the next 13 years", it should be worded as "The singer first created her former stage name Marina and the Diamonds in 2005,[1] and performed under the name for the next 13 years" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:47, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • "shown through: "Man's World" and "Purge the Poison"" - no reason for that colon
    • Done.
  • " It would then become her least peaked album" => " It became her lowest-peaking album".
    • Done.
  • "landed on number two for the Top Dance and/or Electronic Albums component chart" => "landed at number two on the Top Dance and/or Electronic Albums component chart"
    • Done.

I haven't looked at the tables yet -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:24, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude, thank you for coming in and help out by reviewing the prose. I have addressed every brought up issue, let me know if there are additional things to be fixed. Also, I added a question and comment. Thank you! Is it Juan? (talk) 12:35, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Table comments

[edit]

Drive-by comments

[edit]

Just pinging editors

[edit]

@ChrisTheDude and MPGuy2824: Hi, so far the tasks mentioned above are complete. Just pinging y'all if there were any more comments to be made for this list. Let me know and thank you! Is it Juan? (talk) 20:24, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of Pakistani submissions for the Academy Award for Best International Feature Film

[edit]
Nominator(s): Umais🗣 08:18, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this list for featured list because I believe it meets the featured list criteria. The list covers all Pakistani submissions for the Academy Award for Best International Feature Film through the 98th Academy Awards cycle, is supported by reliable sources including the Academy, Dawn, The Express Tribune, Variety, and The Hollywood Reporter, and has been updated with a revised lead, improved prose, and cleaner references. I welcome feedback and will address any issues raised during the review. Umais🗣 08:18, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "animated and documentary feature films are also eligible" - "also" implies that you mentioned a different type of feature film earlier, but you didn't.
  • "Pakistan's first submission was The Day Shall Dawn for the 32nd Academy Awards" - for all the ceremonies which you refer to in this way in the lead, specify the year in brackets, as I doubt many people reading the article will know when, for example, the 32nd Oscars took place
  • "In July 2023, filmmaker Mohammed Ali Naqvi was appointed chairma" - presumably he is mentioned because he is from Pakistan? If so, say that
  • Titles starting with "The" should sort based on the second word in the title
  • Does "In Flames" not have an Urdu title?
  • That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:57, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @ChrisTheDude Thanks for the review. I have addressed the points raised. Please let me know if anything else needs adjustment. Umais🗣 17:02, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:03, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

[edit]
  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year (each header on its own line). If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. ! [[1959 in film|1959]] becomes !scope=row | [[1959 in film|1959]]. If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. This is not a full review, and does not result in a support vote. --PresN 19:37, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @PresN Thanks for the accessibility review. I have made the MOS:DTAB fixes to the table. Please let me know if anything else needs adjustment. Umais🗣 20:20, 18 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of constituencies of the Chhattisgarh Legislative Assembly

[edit]
Nominator(s): -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:10, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

FL review checklist:      Prose: 1/3 Done      Source: Pending      Accessibility: Pending      Image: Pending

The 13th in the Indian constituency series. I've improved the lead, included some history and brought the table accessibility to FL-standards. Similar, recent FL: Bihar. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:10, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "It is housed in the Vidhan Sabha Bhavan," - don't think the building name should be in italics
  • I would also break that quite long sentence into two
  • "has had 6 terms" => "has had six terms"
  • "Indian National Congress, the largest opposition party" => "The Indian National Congress, the largest opposition party"
  • "According to the 2011 census of India the Scheduled Castes constitute 12.8%, while the Scheduled Tribes constitute 30.6% of the population of the state" => "According to the 2011 census of India the Scheduled Castes constitute 12.8% of the population of the state, while the Scheduled Tribes constitute 30.6%."
  • That's it, I think -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @ChrisTheDude: Fixed all. Thanks for the review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:17, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:53, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of senators elected in the 2025 Philippine Senate election

[edit]
Nominator(s): 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 03:11, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list, as this has good prose, everything is sourced, and this covers all subjects and summarizes the 2025 elections. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 03:11, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

[edit]
  • Removed
  • ref 2 is in a weird place. Move it before the "where".
  • Done
  • COMELEC needs to be expanded on first usage.
  • Done
  • "citing lack of political machinery as the reason"
  • Done
  • "stray votes" needs wikilink or footnote
  • Done
  • "The administration coalition was Alyansa ..." This sentence needs a rewrite/copyedit. Does administration coalition the same as governing coalition?
  • Reworded
  • "Another primary coalition was DuterTen, 10 senatorial candidates allied with former President Rodrigo Duterte and incumbent Vice President Sara Duterte" See if "All? 10 senatorial candidates of the DuterTen coalition allied with former President Rodrigo Duterte and incumbent Vice President Sara Duterte" works better.
  • No, they did not ally after they made the coalition. They were fielded to represent both Dutertes in the elections. Reworded
  • "of former Senators Bam Aquino and Kiko Pangilinan to join incumbent Senator Risa Hontiveros in the Senate". I'm not sure that you should talk about them joining the incumbent member since we are still talking about candidates here.
  • Removed
  • The coat of arms in the lead navbox needs alt-text.
  • That would mean I would have to add the alt to the original template {{Politics of the Philippines}}, which would add alts to all articles using this template. Seems too extreme to me.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:01, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: responded. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 13:41, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I would have to add the alt to the original template, which would add alts to all articles using this template. Seems too extreme to me. Per MOS:ALT, "Images and icons that are not purely decorative should include alternative text which describes the image's content and function". This is true for all pages, but especially for Featured ones. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@MPGuy2824: Added. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 07:05, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:09, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Vestrian24Bio

[edit]
Source review
[edit]

This table lists all 26 passages in the article (containing 33 inline citations from 21 unique sources). Generated with the Veracity user script. Vestrian24Bio 11:04, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reference # Letter Source Archive Status Notes
The 2025 Senate election in the Philippines occurred on May 12, 2025, to elect one-half of the Senate. The senators elected in 2025, together with those elected in 2022, comprise the Senate's delegation in the 20th Congress.
1 a chanrobles.com ✅
Background and coalitions
The filing of candidacies took place from October 1 to 8, 2024, at the Manila Hotel,
2 inquirer.net web.archive.org ✅
where a total of 184 people registered to run for senator.
3 gmanetwork.com web.archive.org ✅
More than a week later, the commission released an initial list of 66 approved candidates.
4 inquirer.net ✅
In November, the Philippine Commission on Elections (COMELEC) declared 117 nuisance candidates, 14 of which filed a motion for reconsideration.
5 gmanetwork.com web.archive.org ✅
6 abs-cbn.com web.archive.org ✅
In December, the COMELEC announced 66 names on their final list.
7 abs-cbn.com web.archive.org ✅
Chavit Singson withdrew on January 14, 2025,
8 inquirer.net web.archive.org ✅
WIlbert T. Lee withdrew on February 10, citing lack of political machinery,
9 abs-cbn.com ✅
and Willie Ong withdrew three days later due to ill health.
10 inquirer.net ✅
Lee was still included in the ballot, but votes for him would be considered stray votes.
11 inquirer.net web.archive.org ✅
There were multiple senatorial coalitions with two or more candidates running for the Senate.
12 a philstar.com ✅
The coalition headed by incumbent President Bongbong Marcos was Alyansa para sa Bagong Pilipinas with 12 candidates, including re-electionists, cabinet members, and former senators.
13 newsinfo.inquirer.net ✅
Another primary coalition was DuterTen, 10 senatorial candidates who represented former President Rodrigo Duterte and incumbent Vice President Sara Duterte.
14 tribune.net.ph ✅
Other coalitions included KiBam, consisting of former Senators Bam Aquino and Kiko Pangilinan
15 inquirer.net ✅
and Makabayan, a leftist coalition with 11 members consisting of former Philippine House of Representatives members, activists, and advocates.
16 rappler.com ✅
There were candidates from 20 different parties overall.
17 a ph.rappler.com ✅
Electoral system
According to the 1987 constitution and Republic Act No. 7056 in 1992, senators have been elected on a nationwide, at-large basis via a plurality-at-large voting system. A voter has twelve votes and can vote for up to twelve candidates. Votes are tallied nationwide, and the twelve candidates with the highest number of votes are elected to the Senate. A person cannot be a senator if they are not a natural-born Filipino citizen, are less than 35 years old on the day of the election, cannot read and write, are not a registered voter, or have not been a resident of the Philippines for more than two years before election day. The Commission on Elections administers elections for the Senate and the Senate Electoral Tribunal handles election disputes after a senator has taken office.
1 b chanrobles.com ✅
18 lawphil.net ✅
Results and composition
A total of 825,278,088 valid separate votes were cast.
19 a 2025electionresults.comelec.g… ✅
Out of 69,673,653 registered voters, 57,350,968 voted, with a turnout of 82.20%, the largest in Philippine midterm election history.
20 inquirer.net ✅
Bong Go gained first place with 27,121,073 votes, 6.33% of the total split votes.
19 b 2025electionresults.comelec.g… ✅
Six Alyansa para sa Bagong Pilipinas slate members were elected, four members of DuterTen won the election, and both KiBam members were declared senators.
12 b philstar.com ✅
Aquino and Pangilinan thanked their voters for their unexpected surge into 2nd and 5th places respectively.
21 a philstar.com ✅
12 c philstar.com ✅
Meanwhile, according to The Philippine Star, Marcos's and Sara Duterte's post-election statements conveyed disappointment. Marcos said, "We may not have won every seat, but our work and mission continue. To those who did not make it, your courage to stand for public service is deeply respected. Public service goes beyond elections". Duterte, meanwhile, stated, "While the outcome was not what we had hoped for, our commitment to the people remains unwavering. We will continue to hold the government accountable, advocate for the issues that matter, and work tirelessly to serve as a strong and constructive opposition".
12 d philstar.com ✅
The 12 winning senators' proclamation was held on the afternoon of May 17 at the Manila Hotel.
21 b philstar.com ✅
Notes
Marcos was originally part of the Alyansa para sa Bagong Pilipinas slate, but left.
12 f philstar.com ✅
No text found: citation may be in an infobox or table
12 e philstar.com ✅
17 b ph.rappler.com ✅
17 c ph.rappler.com ✅
19 c 2025electionresults.comelec.g… ✅
19 d 2025electionresults.comelec.g… ✅
Source review: pass. Vestrian24Bio 11:04, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Other comments
[edit]

Vestrian24Bio 10:26, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Vestrian24Bio: Added the first. The deletion discussion's consensus seems to be keep. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 22:49, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
That's all I got, support.
If you could take a look at my FLC nom (Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of 2026 Indian Premier League personnel changes/archive1) as well. Vestrian24Bio 11:05, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Dajasj

[edit]

Thanks for the list!

  • It might be worth considering changing Camille Villar's photo, given that she is missing an arm (and I haven't found information that she is missing one in real life). Even though an older or non-official photo would have to be used.
  • I would link the coalitions in the text, and not in the table
  • I don´t see understand why the table isn't sortable for things like birth year, party and coalition
  • Reactions to the results should not be discussed on the list, but only on 2025 Philippine Senate election in my opinion.
  • The same goes for background and coalitions, who is and isn't candidate isn't relevant or a list about those elected. That's more fitting for Candidates in the 2025 Philippine Senate election imo
  • It would be nice to mention how many seats the Senate has in the first sentence of the lede
  • I don´t understand what "Voted at" means if is nationwide. Some more explanation in the note would help me as someone with little knowledge of Philippine politics.

Kind regards, Dajasj (talk) 08:06, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of NASCAR race wins by Kyle Busch

[edit]
Nominator(s): Nerdy505 (talk) 22:31, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I feel that the list is constructed well enough for people who aren't fans to understand, and with Kyle Busch's recent death, I feel this should be nominated for FL. Nerdy505 (talk) 22:31, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comments

[edit]

Comments

[edit]
  • "he made his NASCAR debut with RFK Racing (then known as Roush Racing)" => "he made his NASCAR debut with Roush Racing (now known as RFK Racing)"
  • "he debuted in the O'Reilly Auto Parts Series (then the Busch Series)" => "he debuted in the Busch Series (now the O'Reilly Auto Parts Series)"
  • "Busch had since moved to Joe Gibbs Racing in 2008 and to Richard Childress Racing in 2023" => "Busch subsequently moved to Joe Gibbs Racing in 2008 and to Richard Childress Racing in 2023"
  • "Through the course of his racing career, Kyle Busch" - no reason to restate his entire name
  • "Busch had won a combined 234 races" => "Busch won a combined 234 races"
  • "In addition, he has earned the most wins" => "In addition, he earned the most wins"
  • "he has won on 25" => "he won on 25"
  • "has won 102 races" => "won 102 races"
  • That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:15, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

GiftedIceCream

[edit]

In addition to the above:

  • Kyle Busch was an American racing driver who competed in NASCAR from 2001 until his death in 2026.→Kyle Busch was an American racing driver who competed in the National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing, LLC (NASCAR) from 2001 until his death in 2026.
  • Busch earned his 52nd win in the 2019 Ultimate Tailgating 200 at Atlanta Motor Speedway.[66→Busch won his 52nd race in the 2019 Ultimate Tailgating 200 at Atlanta Motor Speedway.[66]
  • Ping when done. GiftedIceCream 13:53, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Nerdy505: There are now concerns opened over 3 weeks ago that have not been addressed; I also see that you have not been on Wikipedia since may 30. If there is not movement at this nomination soon, it will be closed as inactive. --PresN 00:00, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of the Thomas Jefferson presidency

[edit]
Nominator(s): Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:07, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Jefferson was president of the United States from 1801 to 1809. Major events from his presidency include the Louisiana Purchase, the First Barbary War, and the Burr conspiracy. This list follows the same format of my previous FL, Timeline of the John Adams presidency. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:07, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Bgsu98 (5/17/26)

[edit]

I enjoyed reading this article! I have following comments:

  • Unless something noteworthy happened en route, the repetitive entries about Jefferson traveling to and from Monticello seem very unnecessary.
May 1801
  • "Jefferson appoints William C. C. Claiborne as governor of the Mississippi Territory."
June 1801
  • You mention Jefferson traveling to Mount Vernon to express his condolences to Martha Washington. I assume this is after the death of George Washington. That is a noteable enough event to include in the timeline on its own. I just looked, and it appears Washington died while Adams was still in office. Therefore, I would add a note to this entry about visiting Martha Washington mentioning when and under what circumstances George Washington died.
  • Is there an appropriate wikilink for "collector of customs"?
  • Is there an appropriate wikilink for "USS Enterprise" (that is not a spaceship 😉)?
July 1801
  • Ditto for these other ships.
  • A brief explanation as to what the Convention of 1800 is would be useful, even if offset with en-dashes.
August 1801
  • You have the USS Enterprise wikilinked here, when it should be linked at its first mention above.
September 1801
  • Jefferson's arrival in Washington does not seem to be noteworthy.
November 1801
  • There has to be a wikilink for postmaster general.
January 1802
  • "a commission rules that the United States owes £600,000 equivalent to $66,720,000 in 2024)" --> I think there is an open parenthesis missing.
  • Same as above, I would include a brief mention as to why establishing the Library of Congress is significant (ie. it is the national library of the United States).
March 1802
  • What is the Midnight Judges Act? Readers shouldn't have to navigate away from the article in order to understand the full context. Even something like "The Midnight Judges Act – an act passed in 1801 that blah, blah, blah... – is repealed. Also, how? Repealed by Congress? By the Supreme Court?
April 1802
  • You shift from present to past tense in the entry for April 14.
  • The image caption is written in past tense, whereas the prose mostly uses the present.
  • Is there a wikilink for the USS Constellation?
May 1802
  • You have "its mayor" in the wikilink, when I would just go with "mayor" (ie. leave the "its" outside the wikilink).
July 1802
  • There have to be wikilinks for the U.S. Military Academy and West Point.
  • Ditto for the USS Adams.
October 1802
  • What is the "intendent of New Orleans"?
November 1802
  • Wikilink Northwest Territory
July 1803
  • "Congress will reject the amendment in October but authorize the purchase." When?
August 1803
  • "Jefferson receives news that France was expressing reluctance in the Louisiana Purchase." --> What does this mean?
  • The phrase is "en route".
October 1803
  • Wikilink USS Philadelphia.
November 1803
  • How is Spanish transferring Louisiana to France if France already sold it to the U.S.?
December 1803
  • What is the Bankruptcy Act of 1800?
  • "...is appointed governor of the Orleans Territory."
January 1804
  • "The Senate ratifies a treaty with Spain to resolve financial disputes. The convention had was originally been signed in August 1802 and it would will not be ratified by Spain until July 1818." --> Since the base of this sentence is the present tense, the resultant verbs should be in the past and future tenses, as indicated.
February 1804
  • You have USS Philadelphia wikilinked here, when it should have been wikilinked earlier at its first mention.
April 1805
  • The Red River Expedition is missing a date.
  • "He ends his cordial relationship with Burr in the following week when he learns Burr is challenging the legitimacy of Jefferson's election in 1801."
May 1805
  • "May – Jefferson appoints Robert Williams as governor of the Mississippi Territory." --> This is also missing a date.
  • "Commodore James Barron informs Hamet Karamanli that the United States will stop supplying him outside of naval support." --> What does this mean? Supplying him what?
July 1805
  • "Jefferson appoints James Wilkinson as governor of the Louisiana Territory."
December 1805
  • "He delivers a second message to Congress secretly to inform them he is negotiating additional territorial acquisitions with France and needs funding."
  • "James Wilkinson is confirmed as governor of the Louisiana Territory."
March 1806
  • "Congress authorizes a commission to plan the Cumberland Road from Cumberland, Maryland, to Weeling, Virginia (present-day West Virginia) to assist with transportation to and from the Ohio River."
April 1806
  • Non-importation Act --> Importation should also be capitalized.
  • "The HMS Leander fires a warning shot at American shipping vessels..." --> I don't think the "The" is needed.
August 1806
  • "James Wilkinson leaves the Louisiana Territory on Jefferson's orders."
November 1806
  • "The Pike Expedition reaches the mountain that will eventually be named Pikes Peak in Pike's honor." --> That part seems unnecessary.
  • "Worrying that Burr is going to invade and annex Spanish territory, Jefferson issues a proclamation warning the American people not to participate."
January 1807
  • "Jefferson receives a message from Wilkinson. It includes what are ostensibly incriminating writings by Burr. It is never determined whether they were genuine or fraudulent."
March 1807
  • I have seen different spellings of Meriwether on this timeline.
September 1807
  • What is Burr's misdemeanor charge for?
November 1807
  • "Baltimore sees protests against Burr." --> What does this mean?

User:Thebiguglyalien: I have examined the entire article. My biggest suggestions are:

  1. Removal of any non-consequential mentions of Jefferson's travel to and from Monticello.
  2. Brief explanations (like, one sentence each) for certain pieces of legislation, treaties, or court cases that are mentioned, so that a reader does not have to navigate elsewhere to figure out the gist of what is goine on.

Please let me know once you have had a chance to examine my comments! Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:20, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bgsu98:
    • I've made all of the suggested grammar fixes, added the explanatory notes, and linked each item on its first appearance.
  • I think it's good to have the timeline show when Jefferson and Congress were in Washington, since it explains when they are and aren't active. I've removed the duplication though where it gives his departure and arrival each time.
  • None of the overview sources provide an exact start date for the Red River Expedition. Do you think this means it's just undue?
  • I've removed "misdemeanor" so it just says treason, that's the part that actually matters.
Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:03, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very long article – he was a two-term president; of course it's going to be – so I'm going to read through it again to see if anything else stands out.

March 1801
  • You could consider wikilinking [[Cabinet of the United States|Cabinet]]. Also, Cabinet appears to be capitalized.
  • "lifting the requirement that houses by made of brick or stone" --> should be "house be made"
May 1801
June 1801
  • I would clarify that Martha Washington's husband was George Washington, the first U.S. president.
  • "Reportedly, she later describes her interaction with Jefferson as painful." --> This seems unnecessary and out of place, and seems to be more about Martha Washington than Thomas Jefferson.
November 1801
  • Recommend wikilinking postmaster general unless it has already been linked previously (which is possible).
December 1801
  • You might clarify what year Wilson delivered his SOU in person, just to emphasize the vast amount of time that the SOU had been delivered in writing.
April 1802
  • "It also allows citizenship for anyone under 21 when their parents became naturalized citizenship." --> This phrasing is a little unclear. Is it retroactive? If so, perhaps "It also allows citizenship for anyone who was under 21 when their parents became naturalized citizens". If it is not retroactive, then it would be "It also allows citizenship for anyone under 21 when their parents become naturalized citizens". --> Also note the incorrect use of citizenship v. citizen.
February 1803
  • Prosecuted for what?
March 1803
  • What is significant about Stuart v. Laird?
August 1803
  • "Meriwether Lewis begins traveling from Pittsburgh en route to join William Clark as co-leaders of the Lewis and Clark Expedition." --> The "en route" is out of place and unneeded.
March 1804
  • "The Land Act of 1804 reduced the lower limit..." --> That should be "reduces".
June 1804
  • "Former consul Richard Henry O'Brien is sent to negotiate with Tripoli and offer $60,000..." --> That should be either "to offer" or "offers".
July 1805
  • "amid rumors that he intents to form his own country" --> That should be "intends".
  • " John Rodgers and demands that Tunisian leader Hammuda ibn Ali declare Tunis will not seek war with the United States." --> Something about the wording in italics is off. Perhaps "confirm that"?

User:Thebiguglyalien: Please let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:11, 10 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bgsu98, everything should be fixed now. I removed a couple of the minor items where the source simply mentioned they happened as part of a timeline without any explanation of the significance. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 05:23, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Just make sure that "Cabinet" is capitalized at every use. Bgsu98 (Talk) 07:16, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "and the resulting dispute led to the landmark Supreme Court ruling" - I think "and the resulting dispute led to a landmark Supreme Court ruling" would be better
  • "the requirement that houses by made of brick or stone" - "by" should be "be"
  • "express condolences to Martha Washington after the earlier death of her husband" - I am going to guess that her husband was George Washington, but I don't think you can assume that readers, especially non-US readers, will know this without context
  • "It determines that Judiciary Act of 1789" => "It determines that the Judiciary Act of 1789"
  • "Jefferson avoid making public comment" => "Jefferson avoids making public comment"
  • That's what I got as far as the end of 1804. I'll come back and look at the rest later..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
More comments
[edit]
  • "John Rodgers and demands that" - there seems to be at least one word missing there
  • "Francisco de Miranda arrives in Washington." - maybe give some context as to who this guy was
  • That's what I got up to the end of 1806 -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:59, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Even more comments
[edit]

2026 Men's T20 World Cup qualification

[edit]
Nominator(s): Vestrian24Bio 10:47, 22 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Now that my other nom has 3 supports; here's the next one. After this I will return to the 2024 qualifiers. --Vestrian24Bio 10:47, 22 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Quick comments

[edit]

Comments

[edit]
  • "The qualification process for the 2026 tournament included two stages: direct qualification and regional qualification. 12 teams were awarded direct qualification while 87 teams took part in the regional qualification to compete for the remaining 8 spots" => "The qualification process for the 2026 tournament included two stages: 12 teams were awarded direct qualification while 87 teams took part in the regional qualification to compete for the remaining 8 spots" (this avoids that not technically wrong but discouraged "starting a sentence with a number written in digit form" thing)
  • "The hosts, India and Sri Lanka,[8] along with the top seven teams from the 2024 tournament: Afghanistan, Australia, Bangladesh, England, South Africa, the United States and the West Indies; directly qualified for the 2026 tournament" => "The hosts, India and Sri Lanka,[8] along with the top seven teams from the 2024 tournament, Afghanistan, Australia, Bangladesh, England, South Africa, the United States and the West Indies, directly qualified for the 2026 tournament"
  • "Canada from Americas" => "Canada from the Americas"
  • ", Nepal, Oman and the United Arab Emirates from the combined Asia-EAP final." => ", and Nepal, Oman and the United Arab Emirates from the combined Asia-EAP final."
  • "Ahead of the 2026 tournament," => "Ahead of the tournament itself,"
  • "Previous best performance" sorts in alphabetical order, which suggests that "super 8" is better than "runners-up"
  • "Date of qualification" doesn't sort in date order
  • "The sub-regional qualifiers were hosted by Tanzania Cricket Association, Cricket Kenya and Nigeria Cricket Federation" => "The sub-regional qualifiers were hosted by the Tanzania Cricket Association, Cricket Kenya, and the Nigeria Cricket Federation"
  • "The top two sides of the regional final, Namibia and Zimbabwe qualified" => "The top two sides of the regional final, Namibia and Zimbabwe, qualified"
  • "in the semi-final 1" => "in the first semi-final"
  • "in the semi-final 2" => "in the second semi-final"
  • "The sub-regional qualifier was hosted by Argentine Cricket Association" => "The sub-regional qualifier was hosted by the Argentine Cricket Association"
  • "The top three sides of the sub-regional qualifier: Bahamas, Bermuda and Cayman Islands advanced" => "The top three sides of the sub-regional qualifier: Bahamas, Bermuda and Cayman Islands, advanced"
  • "The winners of the regional final, Canada qualified" => "The winners of the regional final, Canada, qualified"
  • "The sub-regional qualifiers were hosted by Malaysian Cricket Association and Qatar Cricket Association" => "The sub-regional qualifiers were hosted by the Malaysian Cricket Association and the Qatar Cricket Association"
  • "The sub-regional qualifiers were hosted by Samoa International Cricket Association and Korea Cricket Association." => "The sub-regional qualifiers were hosted by the Samoa International Cricket Association and the Korea Cricket Association."
  • "The top three sides of the regional final: Nepal, Oman and the United Arab Emirates qualified" => "The top three sides of the regional final: Nepal, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates, qualified"
  • "The sub-regional qualifiers were hosted by Italian Cricket Federation, German Cricket Federation and Guernsey Cricket Board" => "The sub-regional qualifiers were hosted by the Italian Cricket Federation, the German Cricket Federation and the Guernsey Cricket Board"
  • "The regional final was hosted by Royal Dutch Cricket Association" => "The regional final was hosted by the Royal Dutch Cricket Association."
  • That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @ChrisTheDude: All done, except for Scotland's qualification date in the table which just won't sort right. Vestrian24Bio 11:18, 2 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @ChrisTheDude..? Vestrian24Bio 11:21, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    Apologies for not coming back to this one sooner. One thing that jumps out is that "date of qualification" still doesn't sort in correct date order. 21 January 2026 sorts before 5-11 July 2025 and 26 September-4 October 2025 sorts before 15-22 June 2025...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:57, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    @ChrisTheDude: tried everything, but just couldn't get Scotland's entry to sort right... Any ideas..? Vestrian24Bio 10:24, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
    I fixed it for you -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:28, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:01, 16 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Olliefant

[edit]
  • Image needs a caption
  • "The hosts, India and Sri Lanka," -> "India and Sri Lanka, the host countries,"
  • Can you expand on Bangladesh withdrawing in the lead?
  • Inconsistent use of DMY, MDY and Slash dates
  • Qualifier C final should list Gurnsry and Jersey as eliminated
That's what I found Olliefant (she/her) 22:39, 28 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Olliefant:
All else done. Vestrian24Bio 11:19, 2 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think it needs to be explained on this page Olliefant (she/her) 20:40, 2 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Olliefant: done. Vestrian24Bio 11:05, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Olliefant..? Vestrian24Bio 11:21, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Olliefant (she/her) 05:51, 21 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of Coldplay live performances

[edit]
Nominator(s): GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 14:12, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have postponed this nomination twice before, it's time to deal with it for good. This list has never been in better shape. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 14:12, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

GiftedIceCream

[edit]

Comments coming in a few days. GiftedIceCream 13:56, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I just fixed the repeated reference issue. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 14:53, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I just removed the note. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 19:07, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the delay, Support GiftedIceCream 13:51, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nothing is LLM-generated.
  • Copyvio check looks good.
  • Refs 32 and 7 are duplicates.
  • I think note B is a little trivial.

Comments from Bgsu98 (4/18/26)

[edit]
Lead
  • I would recommend beginning the first sentence with "The British rock band..."
  • What does it mean, busk?
  • "The former was preceded by multiple warm-up shows, with one of them being a headlining performance at Coachella."
  • "According to Pollstar, the band earned $142.9 million from 2.6 million tickets sold in North America in the 2000s decade."
  • "Coldplay were credited with ushering into in a new era..."
  • "The first 223 shows have made over $1.52 billion..."
Tables
  • I would recommend center-justifying the first column on the first table to match all subsequent tables. I recommend styling the tables to match.
Notes
  • Notes L, M, and N are not full sentences, so they do not need periods at the end.
  • Same for notes P, Q, and R.
  • Same for notes AA.
  • "The concerts in Sydney on 15 November 2012 was broadcast..." --> Either "The concerts... were" or "The concert... was"
  • Notes AD does not need a period at the end.

User:GustavoCza: Please let me know when you've had a chance to examine my comments! Bgsu98 (Talk) 07:12, 18 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Lead
  • Solved. Busking is playing music in public spaces. One example is on "The Karate Kid" music video.
Done. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 02:22, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Tables
  • I'll have to disagree on you on that one because the other tables only have the first column centered because they are dates.
Notes
  • Solved.
GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 22:20, 18 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]


Comments from BennyOnTheLoose

[edit]

I've never reviewed a featured list/article nomination where no authors are mentioned in the references, but I haven't found any policy or guideline that says they must be.

I did a couple of random checks for setlists and none of the three were completely listed in the source:

  • 23 November 2019: source dies not confirm all performed songs (e.g. Sparks)
  • 25 November 2019: source does not confirm (all) performed songs.
  • 21 January 2020: source does not confirm performed songs (in fact, it predates the show)
Are the other setlists confirmed by the stated sources?
  • BroadwayWorld is considered generally unreliable [[[WP:BROADWAYWORLD]]
  • IMDb is is considered unreliable by a majority of editors, but is used a few times. WP:IMDB
  • What makes the TABENON YouTube channel a reliable source? (Coldplay - 2000-11-14 Nulle Part Ailleurs) WP:RSPYT
  • What makes the Timaches Music YouTube channel a reliable source? (Coldplay (Chris) – God Put a Smile Upon Your Face + Interview (Rove Live, 2003))
  • What makes the breanchu YouTube channel a reliable source? (Coldplay Live at RTL2 Studios in Paris (2005-04-13).)
  • Sme question for the other unofficial YouTube refs.
  • Looks from RSN like Pop Sugar, Ecomomic Times and Rolling Stone are OK soures for what they are used for here.
  • What makes Oz [@ColdplayVault] a reliable source?
  • What makes the Cardiff Music History / Hanes Miwsig Caerdydd's Facebook page a reliable source?
  • What makes Coldplay Access [@coldplayaccess] a reliable source?

I'll have some more comments once I've seen the responses to the above. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:16, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Coldplay Access, Cardiff Music History and Oz provide evidence through posters or screenshots. As for the set lists, not all references confirm them in full, but they prove the show happened. If precise breakdowns were required for every event, the list would be greatly reduced and lose meaning. Not to mention featured pages such as List of Taylor Swift live performances and List of Lady Gaga live performances would have never been promoted. Broadway World, YouTube and IMDb need to be checked though. I'll work on them when I can. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 22:35, 24 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Looks ike List of Lady Gaga live performances was promoted over ten years ago so probably isn't a good example for current expectations. List of Taylor Swift live performances has several "unknown"s in the performed songs column. I'd be interested to hear what other reviewers or the co-ordinators think about how WP:V applies to performed songs here, as I'm not looking to create unnecessary hurdles. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:46, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
It feels like a blurry territory for me. I mean, take the Live in Jordan special, it was uploaded on Coldplay's YouTube channel. Should I use the performance itself as a reference instead of citing a magazine that mentions its release? Weird stuff. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 19:15, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • BroadwayWorld – Solved
  • IMDb – Solved
  • TABENON – Solved
  • Timaches Music – Solved
  • breanchu – Solved
  • Other unofficial YouTube refs – Solved
GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 19:19, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@BennyOnTheLoose: courtesy ping. --PresN 13:21, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure video games

[edit]
Nominator(s): - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:29, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because... I believe it has potential, given JoJo's history regarding gaming, and the article covers it comprehensively enough to the point where I feel confident in nominating it. :) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:29, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delegate note: not transcluded onto WP:FLC until April 13 --PresN 11:47, 13 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Pokelego999

[edit]

I will leave comments here in the coming week. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 04:34, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hyperlink character names in the lead where needed (Santana, Speedwagon, Iggy, Avdol, Kakoyin, Polnareff are the ones I see at a glance.)
  • Many statements in the lead are uncited and not backed up in the body. Examples include: "The story is based on the first arc, and the gameplay is similar to GioGio's Bizarre Adventure" and the bulk of the fourth paragraph.
  • Sources 14 and 15 are using bare links rather than proper citation formatting. These should be adjusted.
  • A number of uncited statements in the table. Everything should be cited, especially genre and developers.
  • What is the reliability of Geek Snack? Rest of the sources at a glance look solid.

Overall decent article, but needs a lot of citation work before I'm willing to support. @OpalYosutebito: let me know when the above are addressed or if I can clarify anything. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:06, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperlinks are done. I'm working on the sources right now :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:27, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Pokelego999 I just replaced the Geek Snack source with an Anime News Network one, which the Geek Snack source linked to. Hope that fixed it! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:52, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@OpalYosutebito A few minor points on citations: In the lead, several of the citations lack author names or are missing website links (Siliconera is also referred to as Silicon era in one citation). Make sure you're incorporating these links, names, dates etc when adding more sources, especially once you get to the body tables.
Also, double check your character hyperlinks in the lead. For example, Iggy is still unlinked, and the Joestars also lack them on first mention (Johnothan for example is only linked in the last paragraph, rather than in the second where he is first referenced) Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:59, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Pokelego999 I should be done with the sources. Please let me know if there's anything, be it from the lead or not, that needs a reference call! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:46, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@OpalYosutebito
A few uncited statements in the tables:
-All-Star Battle needs a citation for the JP title
-Ditto for Last Survivor
-Ditto for Jump Force
-Ditto for the Chinese name of Golden Anthem
Otherwise should be good. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:07, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Pokelego999 I should be done now :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:47, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@OpalYosutebito looks good, I have no further concerns. Happy to Support. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 23:45, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

[edit]

In the "appearances" table, two columns are the wrong way round for one entry...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:30, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean, @ChrisTheDude? - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:37, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Wait nvm I found it - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:37, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Icepinner

[edit]

Will review this. Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 11:00, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Several video games based on long-running manga and anime series JoJo's Bizarre Adventure have been released." I feel like you should mention the creator of JoJo's within that sentence. Maybe even a summary of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure for people unfamiliar with the series, but I know that it would be pretty difficult to briefly summarise Jojo's.
  • "A third Capcom game based on JoJo's fifth story arc, Vento Aureo(→), titled GioGio's Bizarre Adventure" Vento Aureo is another name for Golden Wind, but I feel like it should be replaced with the latter since that's more common; people are probably gonna know Part 5 as "Golden Wind".
  • The second and last paragraph in the lead should be joined together imo
  • I don't see anywhere in [2] that says the official release date of JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Heritage for the Future was specifically October 14, 1999, nor do I see "Updated revision of the 1998 JoJo's Bizarre Adventure video game", just "followed by a Sony PlayStation console version in 1999. It was then ported to the Sega Dreamcast console"
  • I think Template:Lang should be used for the Japanese characters, see Template:Lang#Rationale
  • The table in the "list of tables" section should have table captions (screen-reader only or just publicly available is up to your choice I think) per MOS:TABLECAPTIONS
  • "Playstation 2" is linked twice in the table, whereas other repeated video game consoles are not; either link all of them or don't for consistency
  • It seems that JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Stardust Shooters mentions "Released 4 days later for iOS", but JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Eyes of Heaven doesn't mention how the PS4 version was released later than the PS3 version? See below. Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 15:41, 24 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • "{{{release}}}" at the JoJo's Bizarre Adventure Official App row...
  • Citation for the release date of JoJo's Pitter Patter Pop! should be moved to the colon after the header, like the other rows
  • The following are problems with references. I'm clustering them in their own little section since if I recall correctly, the last time I saw the reference section, it looked up to code. Since then, I'm assuming all the problems highlighted below are the result of implementing other reviewers' comments?
    • Empty "Notes" section
    • Cite web errors in a couple of citations
    • A few bare URLs
    • Multiple links are missing archived links... they are needed for consistency
    • "週刊少年ジャンプ 1987 表示号数1" does not have a translated title; add one for consistency
    • Some citations are missing access dates

All from the first round of review. Feel free to oppose anything, ofc. Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 15:15, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Icepinner pardon the ping, but I'm just letting you know that I started working on the sources last night. Most of it is archive work, but I'll do my damndest to add access dates, too! :) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 14:06, 21 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Icepinner what source do you have that the PS4 version of EOH was released after the PS3 version? The sources I found said that they released on the same day... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:13, 24 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, apologies, I think I somehow misread the EOH article; the game was released for the PS3 and PS4 on the same day in Japan. I've struck it out. Ping me for another look at the article. Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 15:41, 24 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Icepinner pardon the ping, but I believe I'm done. Please feel free to add any more suggestions or remind me of anything that I missed - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:47, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I am so, so sorry for the inactivity; final exams are hectic. I'll take another look at it by Friday, and if I don't, please ping me! Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 15:02, 3 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing:

  • "...by Anchor Inc. and published by Bandai" Bandai should be linked here
  • JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Heritage for the Future and JoJo's Bizarre Adventure's Japanese names are listed as "[Hepburn] ([Characters])", yet the Japanese names for the other games are listed the other way around; choose one for consistency.

Otherwise, it looks much better now! Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 17:58, 9 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Icepinner done :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:58, 9 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent work! I will support this nomination (including prose). Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 14:36, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Andrzejbanas

[edit]

Joining in. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:53, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  • Spelling/phrasing/grammar.
    • "series's" should be "series'"?
    • Capital W on West
    • We introduce a lot of ideas, in some areas. Sentences like " On December 1, 1998, Capcom released an arcade fighting game, which was also adapted from the third arc; the game was titled simply JoJo's Bizarre Adventure (though it was released as JoJo's Venture in the west), with an updated version titled JoJo's Bizarre Adventure: Heritage for the Future released later that year." is a pretty big run on sentence.
    • At the bottom of the article, we discuss Jojo cross-over games which seem to be related to Shōnen Jump which isn't even mentioned in how it relates to Jojo. A brief description about why these games are included and any consistent relationship with the comics may be helpful.
  • Sources
    • Large technical details within both the lead are unsourced, this ranges from genres (various mentioned, some unsourced. some I'm not even familiar with ("Medal Shooting Action?") , release dates (some sourced, others not, Japanese games shouldn't be that hard to find release dates for with Famitsu and other sources), developers & publishers (Cobra Team, WinkySoft, Drecom, etc. In the infobox they are separated as developers and publishers, in the info box they are all listed as developers. Which are they? Do we need to know?) in both the lead and the actual lists.
    • Other more real world information is also not sourced. Such as "as the series became popularized", ok, where? Japan? The West? Is this what led to the release or was it other factors?
  • POV
    • A lot of this is written from a fan's POV and presumes we're familiar with either manga or anime series. Describing material as being from "based on the third story arc, Stardust Crusaders" is probably okay if you are familiar with the series, but I wouldn't know if this is from the manga, the anime, some larger Shonen Jump thing, etc. It should give a bit more content to what Jojo is per WP:AUDIENCE so when we mention characters and cameos.
    • I would be cautious to use terms like "Mainline" games unless they are referred to as such by some third-party source. Perhaps better just to say licensed games here to clarify that they are not, fan games or something?
  • Display
    • The table is a bit confusing. Just having a single release date/year and then a series of systems does not make it clear what came out first for what system.
    • We could save a lot of problems like citing publishers/developers/genres etc. by using a different format of table. I'd suggest something similar to how List of Bleach video games is listed which gives space to clarify some details.
    • Also like the Bleach article, we may be better off without an info box and just using the logo or something else representative. A giant group of developers, publishers and genres is more confusing than helpful when they are so many games.

That's all I have at the moment, but I know of a lot what I suggested already would involve a lot of ripping it up and starting again of the article. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:06, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrzejbanas I understand. I shouldn't be too busy this week :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:52, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrzejbanas it's been a while. Do any of your concerns still remain? - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:49, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Its looking a lot better! :) Great work! Still some issues. I think we could re-arrange some information in the lead to format some bits. Like, the " JoJo's Bizarre Adventure began serialization in the weekly shōnen manga anthology Weekly Shōnen Jump in 1987" might be a better as part of the intro. Perhaps after that, just a bit of info of what the general idea of what the series is about (something like "Its about [so and so characters] who do [whatever the general plot beat of JoJo is]" then perhaps say the series is split into various arcs which could lead into the discussion of what game matches what and continue from there. You could re-iterate that into Shonen Jump stuff after.
I haven't checked all the sources yes, but if you agree with me (please do not hesitate to say I may be asking for something wrong), but I do think it'll make things more clear about what we're dealing with. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:05, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrzejbanas what do you think about the prose now? I added a bit of context in the lead - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:22, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Sorry for my absense. Had a few other things going on at the time to not re-read this.
A few more points.
  1. "have been released. The plot of the series is split into nine parts, the first six of which focus on a longwithstanding generational conflict between series protagonist Jonathan Joestar and the vampire Dio Brando." is not sourced.
  2. Cite [1] only works in its archived form (at least for me). I would add "url-status=usurped" to it and update the accessdate
  3. "The first video game, which used the series title, was a role-playing video game based on Stardust Crusaders, the third story arc in the series, and was released in March 1993 for the Super Famicom." is still unsourced (specifically the details of the it being based off the third story arc). This is still continued throughout the article. I don't think its bad or unimportant info, but it requires sources to back it up.
  4. Some sources add commentary that is not part of the source, for example, the Famitsu website citation following the cite that says "A role-playing video game as opposed to the typical fighting games", the latter half is not part of the source, only the first part mentions its an RPG game. This is also a bit weird to say as we haven't introduced the idea the game is predominantly fighting games.
I currently don't think its poorly written, but so much content is not backed up by its sources. Please re-confirm that all of them are backed up by what is being said to be inline with WP:RS and WP:OR. Andrzejbanas (talk) 05:48, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'll be sure to recheck the sources soon! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 01:22, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrzejbanas please let me know what you think. I added some more ref calls and even more sources :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 22:54, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe we can use Midnightmeattrain.com as a source. The manual itself would be okay, the commentary from this fan blog is a WP:SPS. Unless you are citing the manual itself, if so, please add a page and change the page to be about the manual. Andrzejbanas (talk) 06:20, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I found the manuals on archive.org: 1993, 1989. I'll add them when I'm feeling better - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 09:25, 4 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrzejbanas how do they look now? (Sorry for the late reply, I've been busy) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:27, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The manual citations seem to give a brief overview of the plot of the games, but don't say which story arch or anything that the games are based off of. Unless I'm missing something here, this would be against WP:STICKTOSOURCE. Andrzejbanas (talk) 03:38, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Would this be ok for the Joseph Joestar Famicom Jump claim? - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 08:58, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Andrzejbanas come to think of it, as I was digging through Google, a lot of the sources I found that said that Joseph Joestar is in that one Famicom Jump game were either blogs or user-generated to some extent. Should I just remove the claim? (For reference, here are the links I found: 1, 2, 3, 4) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 09:34, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Sorry about the wait in the reply. Yeah if those are all blogs, unless you can connect the author to be some obvious expert on the subject (which I haven't been able to do from a very brief glance). I'd skip it. I'm sorry, I do think its really useful information, but I don't think the sources are valid. :/ Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:57, 17 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I removed it a while back :) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:54, 21 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Olliefant

[edit]
  • [arcade] [fighting game] is an MOS:SOB violation
  • Link "beat-'em'up" in the table
  • Cut both uses of "; not to be confused with the manga of the same name." since I doubt it would confuse anyone on the list of video games page and both articles have links to the relevent manga pretty much immediately
  • Alot of inconsistency in links, "fighting" is sometimes linked sometimes not while "Capcom" is always linked
  • "Battle royale video game" decapitalize
  • Link "DLC" on first mention
  • Some citations are missing dates (both publication and access)
  • Cut the "Notes" heading if its empty
That's what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 15:09, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Aw, Olliefant beat me to the notes and citation comments Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 15:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Olliefant done with the concerns :) - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 02:09, 22 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping to Olliefant and Andrzejbanas. --PresN 13:12, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for removal

[edit]

List of tallest buildings in Albuquerque

[edit]
Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Skyscrapers

Unfortunately this list was nominated almost 20 years ago and the standards have significantly shifted. Here are a few issues:

  • Lead is short and doesn't accurately summarize the list.
  • Citations tags include: contain dead links, and failed verifications, and contain user generated content (I believe this refers to one of the references used not being appropriate, and has been there for 7 years)
  • The "notes" section is sparse and underdeveloped. Consider Grade I listed buildings in Oxford for how the notes for buildings should be. If there is nothing notable about the building, then it shouldn't be on this list, as wikipedia is not a directory.
  • History section should be updated and expanded (when it says some buildings are not downtown, where are they?)
  • Outdated wording "this list is..."
  • None of the images have alt-texts and fail accessibility.
  • Page could really use a map
  • The one note, is just repeated in the notes section.

Mattximus (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of Naruto characters

[edit]
Notified: WikiProject Anime and manga, WikiProject Fictional characters, WikiProject Lists

I am nominating this for featured list removal because 3 weeks ago I made a talk page post and pinged numerous editors active there in the past, where I outlined the problems: "After List of Boruto characters was merged here, this gained a lot of unreferenced content (ex. section on Moegi Kazamatsuri; there are others). My second concern is that even entries on notable characters (ex. Hinata) contain just plot summary and info on voice actors, there is no reception / analysis (which some of the articles on individual characters have, some are even GA like aforementioned Hinata).". Since then, User:BinaryBrainBug also observed that at "Approximately 24,000 words, that's too large". In ter of WP:FLCR, the issuses are 3a (comprehensivness) and 3b (poor referencing). To my concern on comprehensivness, I'll add that the list has cherry-picked random information for various characters and is not very up to date. For example, the newest (Boruto) arc antagonist is Jūra, yet his entry is very short; while for example some less relevant characters (ex. Ao) have much longer plot summaries. This is a minor issue, but the main is the lower quality content when it comes to the merged Boruto entries and lack of summary of reception/analysis for many characters. For example, Boruto character Sumire section is just an unreferenced plot summary, despite sources like [2] or [3] existing. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:45, 14 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Could indeed be better summarized and referenced. Shouldn't be hard to get back in featured list territory. Not my research area. Let's wait for other opinions. Selbstporträt (talk) 00:13, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of Meerkat Manor meerkats

[edit]
Notified: Wikipedia:WikiProject Television, Wikipedia:WikiProject Lists, Wikipedia:WikiProject South Africa

I am nominating this for featured list removal because it contains significant unreferenced content (Wikipedia:Featured list criteria: 3b). I have noted the problems few days ago on the talk page, to no replies from anyone (the principal editors of this list are inactive). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:08, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

List of mammals of Korea

[edit]
Notified: Example user, Example WikiProject

I am nominating this for featured list removal because

  • It probably needs updating. some of the sources were last accessed in 2006. Some of the IUCN assessments probably need updating, and some of the taxonomy has probably been changed too by now.
  • Images lack alt text
  • Several CS1 errors
  • at least one unsourced statement

EmergentAnarchy (talk) 16:15, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates&oldid=1360719289"