This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks.JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 6 September 2014.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
Previous copyedits:
/
This article was copy edited by NickGibson3900 on 24 August 2014.
Isn't glutamate salt responsible for this? I don't have time to look this up. Anybody else? Maybe a link to another article in wikipedia explaining this phenomenon? Thy, SvenAERTS (talk) 13:15, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have the time to research how many of the studies were done by independent agencies, but I find the statement that MSG is not linked to headaches totally false. And I love Asian food and respect Asian culture and people. I have tested my reaction to MSG enough to know I need to avoid it as much as possible. I also know several people who have the same reaction, so it's not "just a me thing." I believe that continuing to promote this additive supports a food industry that is not devoted to supplying people with the freshest, most wholesome nutritional resources over profits. ~2026-52831 (talk) 15:39, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't have the time to do the research, then you're simply relying on anecdotal evidence, which is 100% unreliable. Why's that? I'm in my sixties. I love Asian food as well, and have enjoyed in since I was a small child. I've never had a headache after eating asian food. I buy MSG powder as a spice to add to foods I cook. I use it liberally. No headaches. If it gave me headaches - well, I'd stop using it, obviously. So, you get headaches - from "Asian food", much of which does not have MSG added - I get none, using it liberally. My personal experience cancels out yours. That's how anecdotal evidence works - completely unreliable and unconvincing, because it's not based on science.
The original poster stated "I don't have time to look it up". You state "I don't have the time to research [...]. Those two statements in and of themselves confirm it as being a "you problem", because you aren't interested in the facts, only your opinions, which hold no valid weight. There's an entire paragraph on Safety in the article, sourced top to bottom to valid scientific research and studies.
I was going to just remove the comment, as it really falls in the WP:NOTAFORUM column. But if you come to WP for information, but can't be bothered to confirm what you've read - only being interested in confirming your own opinions - then why bother? 'MSG gives you headaches' is a bog-standard 'urban legend'. What you've experienced is known as Confirmation bias. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is.19:24, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]