This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Manifest destiny article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Manifest destiny was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of crime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
I think Manifest Destiny should be capitalized, capital M, capital D. the concept is commonly stylized this way. i might just be wrong here, though. almost everyone here on this talk page is, similarly, stylizing it such. it may make the page look cluttered, however. » Braytalk05:23, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There used to be a wikiarticle on the Westward Movement, though I haven't looked at it in years. Today I had occasion to look something up, but poof! it's gone, replaced by DAB links to "territorial expansion" and this article. THIS IS SO WRONG. The Westward Movement has been a distinct social and cultural topic in American history since before the Civil War, and many many many books and articles have been written about it. It overlaps with "manifest destiny" and "territorial expansion", true, but it is bigger and different from both of them. To delete the article and dissipate it into the other two is an editorial crime in my view - quite literally rewriting history for political correctness. And that stinks.
But I'm retired and it's not worth my "golden years" time to argue with the misguided and the self-righteous about it. I'm just posting this as a note of protest, and will leave it at that. I won't respond to any replies, so have at it, boys - do as you please. But don't act all shocked and surprised when other people do unto you. Textorus (talk) 21:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
“Westward movement” has been a redirect to this page for nearly twenty years…
Every article should present objective facts and not opinions. For example, linking “”American Exceptionalism” and Christianity to this concept is not factual and is propaganda -opinion. 172.250.22.27 (talk) 05:49, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The book "Mexicano Political Experience in Occupied Aztlan: Struggles and Change" in no way a reliable scholarly source. It's an irredentist opinion book involving the pseudoscientific concept of Aztlan, a racialist and nationalist concept using quack science to justify a racial entitlement to certain land in the southwest US. It includes a pseudoscientific idea that the Aztecs had migrated from that region, despite scholarly consensus stating the Aztecs had never lived even remotely close to the modern day United States -in fact they most likely migrated from a just few 100km northwest from the valley of Mexico. It's simply a irredentist concept to try and claim a racial entitlement to land, very similar to manifest destiny on its own. This book doesn't belong as a source in the article, especially in the heading as it's not reliable or scholarly and does not meet Wikipedia standards for reliability. ArslanKhan98 (talk) 19:22, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know whether of not this info is useful -- I may even have misidentified the book author -- however, this piqued my curiosity enough to do some quick googling. From the results, see this and this. It looks to me as if there may be WP:DUE issues here. This article is on my watchlist but isn't a hot-list item for me, so I'll leave further discussion to editors who know more about the details than I. Wtmitchell(talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:32, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]