Talk:Kajol
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kajol article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
| This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence, realise) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| Kajol has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:25, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Early sources from the archives
[edit]Sections
[edit]As I said, the idea that she had only two years of what is called here "widespread success" (this should change too) is unimaginably funny. I personally think that from 1999-2001 she was still successful and a big star even if she had flops (like any actor). But anyway 1995 was a big year for her.
I suggest one of the following:
- Debut and rise to prominence (1992–1996)
- Widespread success (1997–2001)
- Comeback and intermittent work (2006–2012)
- Dilwale and return to Tamil cinema (2015–2019)
- Tanhaji and Netflix debut (2020–present)
or:
- Debut and rise to prominence (1992–1994)
- Widespread success (1995–1998)
- Comeback and intermittent work (2006–2012)
- Dilwale and return to Tamil cinema (2015–2019)
- Tanhaji and Netflix debut (2020–present)
Generally, if we change "Widespread success" to "mainstream success" or "established actress". Shahid • Talk2me 10:49, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- The first one. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 11:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Don't you think DDLJ is part of her widespread success and not part of her breakthrough? Shahid • Talk2me 14:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- I have been thinking about it; you are right. The second one is better. —Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 01:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
- Don't you think DDLJ is part of her widespread success and not part of her breakthrough? Shahid • Talk2me 14:47, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:38, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Don't revert reliably sourced edits.
[edit]Someone has been repeatedly reverting my correct edits, please stop them. AlphaVictorDelta0107 (talk) 11:10, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- @AlphaVictorDelta0107: indiakanoon is not a reliable source. Shahid • Talk2me 12:28, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Shshshsh: Indiankanoon isn't inherently RS or non-RS. It is just a database (like Justia or Encyclopedia.com) and as long as the underlying information/retrieval is true there should be no problem in using it. Court records and minutes are extensively used across Wikipedia for satisying WP:LEGALNAME. Though editors should preferably use {{Cite LIIofIndia}}.
- I believe I was the one who initially added the legal name here using a database sourcing from Ministry of Corporate Affairs ([1], another database though I think OpenCorporates is also a solid alternative as well [MCA doesn't allow directly citing its database as of now) which should be fine as well.
- PS: Though AlphaVictorDelta0107 has been disruptive otherwise at many articles and I have taken this to ANI. Gotitbro (talk) 04:45, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use Indian English
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- Biography articles of living people
- GA-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- GA-Class vital articles in People
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Mid-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- GA-Class India articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Maharashtra articles
- High-importance Maharashtra articles
- GA-Class Maharashtra articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Maharashtra articles
- GA-Class Mumbai articles
- High-importance Mumbai articles
- GA-Class Mumbai articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Mumbai articles
- WikiProject India articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles



