Talk:Bioethics
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Hi my name is Buket. I'm a Molecular Biology master student and I am editing the page was given to me as an assignment for Recent Developments in Biotechnology (MLC501) in Uskudar University. https://outreachdashboard.wmflabs.org/courses/Uskudar_University,_Istanbul,_Turkiye/MLC501_Recent_Developments_in_Biotechnology_2022-2023_Fall_(2022-2023)/home
Claims that this article supports the political left
[edit]The intro shows a clear leaning to the politcal left, with how it brings up that "many bioethicists are simply christians in sheeps clothing" point.
---
Deleting references to the implicit politics shows a "clear leaning" to the political right. That many conservatives see bioethics as a possible replacement for abortion issue or as a means for expanding the anti-abortion constituency is no secret. Avoiding the all too obvious is hardly the expression of a neutral point of view.
- Why is this a lean to the right? You are attributing views to me that I do not have. As for "avoiding the obvious", you may miss the point. We cannot make anti-right (or anti-left) political statements in an encyclopedia. See our [[[NPOV]] policy for more details. I would agree with you that people on the political right are using certain bioethical issues as a hammer to push their policies. So do people on the political left. (The question, who is right to do so?!) But that isn't quite the subject of this specific article; this specific article is about the field of philosophy known as bioethics. I agree with you that a discussion of how bioethics has been used for political purposes can and should be written; however, it would be more appropriate if it is only briefly discussed here, and then linked to another article.
Request for info on Christian bioethics
[edit]Why is there no list of Christian bioethics references?
- Sadly, no one has yet volunteered the time to research this issue. It would be a great idea if someone did some research on this topic. Which universities, or seminaries, have specialists in Christian bioethics? Who are the most respected Christian authorities in this field? What are their major works? How do the stands of Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant Christianity compare and contrast on these issues? Any help would be appreciated. RK 03:16, Jul 11, 2004 (UTC)
Transhumanist biologists see their work as inherently ethical ? o.O
[edit]"Transhumanist biologists in particular can be prone to this misunderstanding, as they see their work as inherently ethical, and attacks on it as unethical."
Is there a reference to back this up ? I'm quite skeptic about the "transhumanist biologists see their work as inherently ethical" part. Flammifer 9 July 2005 13:02 (UTC)
Are you crazy? Transhumanism is a type of humanism! A secular movement in ethics!
Missing discussion on the definition of "harm"
[edit]Most modern and many ancient bioethics commitments center around "not doing harm". But the definition of harm, and how broad that definition should be is very limited. This article would be far more useful if it included a discussion of this controversy. Ftrotter (talk) 26 May 2018
Wiki Education assignment: Scientific Communication
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2026 and 7 May 2026. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hnguyen024, User6836 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: IsaacReed314, 1ofOneee, Opalerae, Kirbyfan7, Marinasainz36.
— Assignment last updated by 1ofOneee (talk) 01:45, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Lack of expansion on Rawlinson's article in the Feminist bioethics section/other concerns
[edit]The last paragraph in the Feminist bioethics section seems to be a loose summary of the abstract of Mary C. Rawlinson's The Concept of A Feminist Bioethics; the transition between the previous paragraphs and the aforementioned section is also lacking, which makes the overall section hard to read. If the last paragraph is to be kept, the content should be rephrased in a way where it does not read as near-identical to the original abstract.
Also, there is a lack of a citation for Ihor Boyko's Bioethics in the Models of bioethics section. Additionally, there should be more models of bioethics asides from Boyko's due to varying schools of thought in the field. Hnguyen024 (talk) 19:34, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
Likely AI-generated text
[edit]Concerns have been raised about AI-generated content in part of this article. This is a procedural talk page section to discuss it. There is no need to ping me in response. Read WP:AISIGNS for more information. Rationale: this 2024 addition; note WP:AISIGNS in superficial analyses, vocab distro typical of 2023-24 LLM text etc Gnomingstuff (talk) 17:39, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- Start-Class vital articles in Philosophy and religion
- Start-Class medicine articles
- Mid-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- Start-Class Biology articles
- Mid-importance Biology articles
- WikiProject Biology articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- High-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class ethics articles
- High-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- Start-Class social and political philosophy articles
- High-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- Start-Class philosophy of science articles
- High-importance philosophy of science articles
- Philosophy of science task force articles
- Start-Class Religion articles
- Top-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- Unknown-importance politics articles
- Start-Class Libertarianism articles
- Low-importance Libertarianism articles
- WikiProject Libertarianism articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Start-Class Transhumanism articles
- Mid-importance Transhumanism articles
- Start-Class Animal rights articles
- High-importance Animal rights articles
- WikiProject Animal rights articles
- Start-Class Environment articles
- Mid-importance Environment articles

