Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
28 June 2026
- diffhist m Module:Check for unknown parameters 22:16 +16 MSGJ talk contribs (+pushpin_map)
- diffhist Module:Check for unknown parameters 21:41 +378 MSGJ talk contribs (add list of pushpin map parameters)
- diffhist Linux 20:09 −5 Neat93867 talk contribs (→Copyright, trademark, and naming: Maintenance: changed cite 74 from linux-watch.com to lwn.net, per previous edit. Added fields \quote\ and \website\.)
- diffhist Linux 19:59 +64 Neat93867 talk contribs (→Copyright, trademark, and naming: Maintenance re "CS1 maint: deprecated archival service" on cite 74. I can't find this article anywhere on the web; see next edit for change of citation to lwn.net.)
- diffhist Linux 19:12 −142 Neat93867 talk contribs (→Overview: Maintenance re "CS1 maint: deprecated archival service" on cite 38. Expanded citation for readability; added newlines and spaces; alphabetized fields; changed dead url to live url; removed archive-url; changed field name \last\ to \website\ and edited value; edited access-date.)
- diffhist Linux 18:51 +76 Neat93867 talk contribs (Maintenance: expanded one citation for readability; added newlines and spaces; alphabetized fields; changed the archive-url to one where images resolved, edited archive-date; changed last field to website; added url-status. Observed six errors on other citations.)
- diffhist Venture capital 12:34 +1,311 Dfadden talk contribs (→Australia and New Zealand: Adding content re: BugHerd after merge outcome at AfD)
- diffhist Wikipedia:No original research 10:00 −348 Zlamma talk contribs (→Original images: Same meaning, much more concise. More than half of the section was actually saying when an image *is* original research (as opposed to the parent section's goal of answering "What is not original research"), which were all just elaborations on the 'as long as' - made more visible that it is. Some more context: part of this talk Wikipedia_talk:No_original_research#"What_is_not_original_research_>_Original_images"_has_1_paragraph_on_topic_and_rest_off-topic_and_duplicate)
- diffhist m Wikipedia:No original research 09:33 +99 Zlamma talk contribs (→Original images: Link to where the policy of no photo manipulation is detailed)
- diffhist JSON 08:57 +57 Artoria2e5 talk contribs (→Alternatives: ~)