Jump to content

User talk:MSGJ

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"we should probably stop replying to them"

[edit source]

Hello MSGJ,

Not sure if you intended this, but simultaneously asking people to stop responding while you yourself take the right to continue doing so comes across as hypocritical. You engaged with Teterev53 on their talk page and one hour later told me and others on ANI to not do the same. Please consider putting the same trust in other editors you expect us to put in you. CapnZapp (talk) 13:54, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit source]

Thank you for participating in Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2026_May_20#20_May_2026. Utfor (talk) 19:50, 5 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Women in Red meetup 2018 articles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 18:08, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MSGJ,
I hate to send you CSD C1 notices but it looks like these categories were intended to be temporary. Hope all is well with you. Liz Read! Talk! 18:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Ooh, that means DreamRimmer's bot has done its job. Thank you DreamRimmer! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:16, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit source]
The Admin's Barnstar
As per. qcne (talk) 14:32, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Closing too soon

[edit source]

Just in case you missed my ping in a sea of notifications, I just want to point out that your community ban on Larry Singer was acted too quickly and is likely to be challenged. OhanaUnitedTalk page 15:30, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It's a block not a ban — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:44, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No, it's a ban, because, per your own words, you were enacting consensus, and per our policies, consensus to indef is a cban. It says so right at WP:CBAN. Look, you pull the trigger, you file the paperwork. You need to either clarify that this is a unilateral admin block and not the enactment of consensus (bad idea! don't do it!) or else follow the procedures at WP:CBAN (which prob means undoing the block and waiting until the 72hrs is up). Levivich (talk) 16:08, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I blocked per the strong consensus for the indefinite block at the time, but I was not invoking a community ban because (i) there were relatively few comments on that aspect, (ii) I recognise the additional bureaucratic requirements of a ban, and (iii) there was still discussion about other options including a partial block. Therefore I deliberately did not "close" the thread, to allow that discussion to continue. I have re-read WP:CBAN and acknowledge the potential confusion, so apologies if this muddied the water. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:46, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Are you going to release a statement on the block? Guz13 (talk) 16:11, 22 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You really should - it's fishy to be absent in the entire discussion while enacting an out-of-procedure block and not explain yourself. ~2026-36357-96 (talk) 04:40, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

you are a funny man

[edit source]

Larry Sanger is one of Wikipedia's co-founders. Priklemin (talk) 17:45, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

MSGJ, you got yourself in a Private SNAFU💀 Priklemin (talk) 17:46, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
he was defended by Wikipedia's other co-founder Priklemin (talk) 17:48, 23 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]