shenglong
u/shenglong
They have more structure like Cali gangs, or OG Chicago gangs. Gangs stretch across block, neighbourhoods and even provinces. Some of them will align themselves with the Prison Numbers gangs.
The problem these days is that many of the high-level bosses have either been killed, or are locked up. Shit like this in the vid is not super-uncommon, but the big bosses dissuade it because it attracts too much heat, and in most cases it's just pointless.
There's a BBC documentary called Cape of Fear about twin brothers who ran the Hard Livings gang. When they got out of prison they told their gang they were dumb AF for fighting and killing their opps if there was no profit. In fact, in the documentary, they were gonna kill one their opps who they kidnapped, but the twins said it would be better if he gave them guns, drugs and info. So they let him go. This is how they became one of the biggest and most powerful gangs in the country.
Thanks for reading my blog <3
EDIT: Damn, I watched the opening again. Within the first two minutes you can see why gangs go to shit when there isn't strong leadership
I have seen 1000s. None are convincing re: that they are otherworldly, or from another dimension. I mean, how could they be that convincing? Sure, it's unidentified, but it's also just a static image.
Witness testimony is far more convincing for me personally. Especially when you have multiple witnesses in different contexts, who saw the same event at different times from different angles, e.g. Off the top of my head, Kecksburg.
Now for those who really really think this is a cop-out and insist on seeing images, just go to Eyes on Cinema's YT channel, or Google "Jenined Clear UFO compilation"or "Suspect Sky" or w/e.
You're right, but I just honestly don't think he knows what he's talking about. He's just stringing random words together.
Here's roughly what he said WRT to a disclosure-related question:
"We can provoke. You can't give anyone anything. You can't take anything. You need to provoke, and they need to give, and you need to receive [...] It is an ontological issue. The UFO stuff is a symbol... there are things a lot deeper than UFOs... I suspect."
"It's a symbol that means freedom of thought. Because if we can talk about it with the right words, then we have freedom of speech, which causes debate, and debate causes thought, which leads to freedom of thought"
Like, WTAF are you talking about bro.
What a very strange individual. He seems to be very passionate about this subject but I can't take him seriously. I struggled to get through many parts of his interview with Jesse Michels. I quit when they were talking about Bob Lazar's heart attacks or something. I mean, this is someone in the UFO community who had to double-check what the word "ontological" means?
In the Area52 interview I just thought he was drunk or high, or both. After skimming through 30 minutes or so of the Michels interview I'm just convinced that he doesn't really have a firm grasp on his own ideas.