mercurytuna

Really? Papertrails is a vulgar word to you, I guess, since an unwritten order is an illegal order, and the site's about papertrails. Illegal order - unwritten order - illegal alien, undocumented alien: illegal simply means unwritten, and always has. Always will, buy the looks of things. Illegal alien is an undocumented alien, plain and simple, because you can't make a law against a noncitizen. Legally impossible to make a law against someone who isn't aspiring to the laws around them geographically.

Papertrails.

President don't need papertrails, but Article IX (bill of rights, federal) nonpublic entities do? Fuck that. Tit for tat, papertrail for papertrail, disagree and that's treason against the papertrail called the bill of rights, a bill, an itemized bill, charging a debt (how many bills do you ignore?) that the constitution owes. Ta-da! Pretend the constitution is you, already billed, before ever seeing a neighbor in the morning. Trillions of rights, yours, at Article IX, one sentence long, merely one sentence long.

upperandlowercase.com

I don't doubt that. I don't dispute that. I don't argue (present position) against that. I don't structure against that. I don't care if legalizing marijuana is more popular than the republican party (properly lowercased per rules of English for lettering), more popular than most leading re-public-ans (I see your public and I "re" your public, using honest documents only while you stutter like liars stutter with absent documents), and/or/either/or/both/allthree, more popular than virtually the entire republican platform. Marijuana use is already lawful and legal per Article IX, bill of rights (only one sentence long) so "privilegizing" a right is bait-and-switch, as usual, false advertising, where advertising that constitutions are of more than doodles of ink (Article IX also explains how wet-ink signatures exist, and human ova are fertilized, all explained with that tiny one sentence at Article IX if using only constitutional language for explaining fertilized ova, ONLY constitutional language for explaining how wet-ink signatures even exist for a constitution to "see" and "recognize" a signature of wet ink). So I don't care.

upperandlowercase.com

Okay, I care sum. I smoke pot. Lawful and legal. The Supreme Law of the Land supersedes the law of the land (statutes).

Always has.

upperandlowercase.com

Always will.

Especially since all of the other articles of the bill of rights spring from Article IX (big trick for us from the writers for that one lovely sentence; right to bear arms, Article IX. Right to free speech, Article IX. Right to make sexysexy and babies, Article IX. Right to pink polka dot refrigerators minus an authorizing statute, Article IX. Right to life with honest legal name, Article IX -- dirt, seed, water, sun, is noncommercial activity, dear Neighbor Raich. Neighbor Raich, you were betrayed, when attorneys raised noncommercial activity at the last moment only, for a sham of conquering a legitimate noncommercial activity (lawful and legal). For profit (why else are courthouses on Dunn & Bradstreet reports, if nonprofit?). Dunning is a debt collection, check your dictionary -- "dunning"

upperandlowercase.com