r/CollapseNetwork

Bạn trùng sinh lại trước ngày tận thế, cấp tốc chuẩn bị nhu yếu phẩm và xây dựng pháo đài an toàn. Nhưng bạn lại nhận ra những sự thật và rủi ro sau:

Nếu mua một lượng lớn đồ ở cùng một nơi, bạn sẽ bị nghi ngờ là đầu cơ trục lợi. Vì thế, bạn đổi phương án mua ở nhiều cửa hàng khác nhau. Rồi bạn lại tiếp tục nghĩ: Nếu mua như vậy thì coi như là ổn, nhưng những chỗ đó lại cùng một khu vực, rất dễ thu hút sự chú ý của 'camera chạy bằng cơm' (hàng xóm hoặc người dân gần đó).

Thế là bạn thay đổi chiến lược: Mua số lượng nhỏ ở từng khu vực cách xa nhau. Tiếp đến là vấn đề pháo đài an toàn, cái này thì dễ hơn; lý do để nói với mọi người là bạn thích xây dựng nhà theo chủ đề tận thế.

Tưởng chừng mọi chuyện đã ổn thỏa, nhưng trong đầu bạn chợt nảy ra một vấn đề lớn không lớn, nhỏ không nhỏ: Nếu tận thế ập đến, những người thợ nảy sinh ý định cướp nơi ở của bạn thì sao? Có lẽ họ sẽ không làm được gì vì pháo đài được tạo nên bởi nhiều nhóm thợ, nhưng cốt yếu là vị trí nơi an toàn bị bại lộ. Bạn trở thành mục tiêu, coi như là 'con cừu béo' trong mắt mọi người.

Có khả năng chuyện lớn dần lên, giả thuyết xấu nhất là đến tay chính phủ, hoặc khi luật pháp sụp đổ, các nhóm tổ chức sẽ nhắm đến bạn.

There is a "new paradigm" brewing. It has various names, and various groups of people exploring what exactly it should look like. I have my own take on this, which is to frame it in terms of westernising the concept of ecocivilisation (I have a book in the pipeline, don't have a release date yet). Postmodernism is philosophically outdated and politically being routed, and there is a recognition that it will need to be replaced with something. From that perspective the new paradigm is called "metamodernism", although exactly what that means is up for debate. Daniel Schmactenberger and the Resilience Project frame it in terms of "the Metacrisis, and for them it is defined by existential systemic risk and the need to redesign society. Iain McGilchrist frames it in terms of neuroscience and his new left/right theory of how the human brain works and how this has influenced the large-scale pattern of Western history. For him the crisis is defined by total dominance of the left hemisphere and a the need for a new age where both hemispheres worked together (as they did during the golden age of ancient Greece, for example). Deep Adaptation and The Dark Mountain Project are also part of this meta-movement.

Their "map" might help: ... tem-map/71

Also see:

What all the different parts of this meta-movement have in common is a recognition that radical cultural transformation -- or evolution of socio-cultural systems -- is now both necessary and inevitable. All are searching for something radically new in terms of ideology -- a fundamentally different way of thinking and of interacting with reality. "Second Renaissance" is an attempt to try to bring all of it together under one large umbrella.

Forum:

Here is an idea of mine that could save humanity.

An idea that I got from this video ->

It is absolutely correct in that focusing on the doom and gloom aspects of global warming does not work, it makes people give up and to retreat back into their comfort of inaction.

So if exposing the consequences won't work, then what will? By changing society, an ambitious undertaking for sure, but changing society in a way that rewards mitigating climate change.

I propose the Carbon Credit Score (CCS for short), a system where the lower your carbon emissions are the higher your score is, and the higher your carbon emissions the lower your score.

The scores could be tracked in a similar way that your bills are, with sensors or smart measurement gadgets, phones could be used too.

So imagine something like a universal basic income, or even a universal carbon income, people who score higher get paid more by the government, lower scorers get paid less. Not only that, but the score system also includes score titles that comes with their own level of social standing.

This policy could breed a social culture where everyone tries to outdo each other with their scores, and by doing so reducing their negative impact on the environment. Ideally, higher scorers would have a higher social status, which could add more social pressure which would increase the effectiveness of such a system.

And if it is all very successful, then this social pressure could extend to the government as well as environmentally damaging businessess like oil companies, which will cause them to be more environmentally friendly to preserve their reputation or even to get rewards from the government, and greenwashing won't work since greenwashing does not actually lower carbon emissions now do they.

All in all, I think this policy has alot of potential to change our society into one that rewards helping the environment, and one that could tap into our social nature to actually bring about positive change, where human nature could actually be used for good.

Thank you for reading and please seriously consider this. If you like this idea, then please share it.