Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singam
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- Singam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:NFF. No prejudice against recreation when reliable sources confirm that filming has commenced. Prod removed by anon user without explanation (article has also been successfully prodded before, but recreated). PC78 (talk) 10:50, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 11:08, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete From the only reference: "The views expressed in the article are the author's and not of Sify.com". There is no reliable source, so as nom eloquently explained, WP:NFF and common sense requires deletion. Johnuniq (talk) 11:22, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. According to WP:NFF: Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles. When I did a Google search on the issue there is only one story about this film from April 2008, about the movie being announced and not actually starting the filming process. JulieSpaulding (talk) 12:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete for now - Vartanza (talk) 12:43, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NFF--RadioFan (talk) 12:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.