Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erettopterus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Icewedge (talk) 06:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Erettopterus

Unsourced, Unreferenced, and hasn't been touched since June 30. Hairy Perry 15:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A simple Google search lists plenty of possible searches and the article is crucial to the paleobiology pages. Could easily be expanded by mentioning species in this genus. I'll add a source (might look unreliable at first, but the FAQ says only professional researchers may contribute). - Mgm|^(talk) 18:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, deletion policy says that deletion should be used as a last resort when the article cannot be salvaged. WP:NOEFFORT is not a valid reason for deletion. - Mgm|^(talk) 18:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep No valid reason for deletion has been provided and the article is now sourced. Edward321 (talk) 21:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the reasons and ref's from Mgm. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 21:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Classification seems prime encyclopedia material, and the article is now adequately sourced. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Close as keep per this article is now sourced and reconstructed to fit the standards of the encyclopedia. Hairy Perry 13:35, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.