Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aluma Shield
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Deleted after my tag (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 01:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
- Aluma Shield (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This was originally prodded by User:Boleyn with the following concern "Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY". I prodded it myself a minute ago for the same reason, only to realize it was deprodded by User:James500 with the following edit summary: "GBooks: USA Major Manufacturers, Site-Selection Handbook". Unfortunately, James didn't bother to add a link to that source; I was able to find it, I think - [1] - but it is just an address/catalogue entry, hardly sufficient to prove notability. All I see elsewhere are mentions in passing. The company exists, but I don't see how it passes Wikipedia:Notability (companies). WP:CORPSPAM. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:02, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Boleyn (talk) 23:32, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Concur with nom. Insufficient coverage to meet WP:NCORP. MB 03:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.