User talk:~2026-19019-8

January 2026

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at alternate history, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 05:28, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia content is not random user opinions, all material is expected to be a summary of a sources that should also be cited. Per WP:BRD, if you would like to contest well sourced material and are reverted, I suggest to use the article's talk page to explain why and to list non-Mormon affiliated (independent) sources that contradict those currently in use. Or to show where the text does not match the cited source, if the issue is misrepresentation. ~2025-42166-43 (talk) 02:26, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]