User talk:VeritasFlow

This is VeritasFlow's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:VeritasFlow/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 17:06, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my submission. I’d really appreciate it if you could point out the specific issues that led to the decline, so I can make the necessary improvements and resubmit.

Thanks again for your time and help! VeritasFlow (talk) 17:45, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Richard Stöhr. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is not a complete draft of an article but a section about Richard Stöhr, who is already the subject of an article. The submitter should discuss at the article talk page, Talk:Richard Stöhr, whether this section can be added to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:VeritasFlow/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:35, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, VeritasFlow! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:35, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robert,

Thank you for your guidance. I understand that my submission was declined because it is a section rather than a complete article. I will discuss the proposed addition on the Talk page of the Richard Stöhr article before attempting another submission. I appreciate your help and will use the Help Desk and Teahouse resources if needed.

Best regards, VeritasFlow (talk) 23:41, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Love.cinema.art per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Love.cinema.art. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 19:17, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I joined Wikipedia to learn, contribute, and grow within a collaborative environment. I’ve spent time asking editors for guidance, studying policies, and trying to improve my understanding of how things work here. I have not violated any rules, nor have I attempted to deceive or evade anything. If there’s been a misunderstanding, I’m open to clarifying ,but I genuinely don’t know what I’ve done wrong. I respectfully request that this block be reconsidered so I can continue learning and contributing in good faith. VeritasFlow (talk) 20:35, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VeritasFlow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

I joined Wikipedia to learn, contribute, and grow within a collaborative environment. I’ve spent time asking editors for guidance, studying policies, and trying to improve my understanding of how things work here. I have not violated any rules, nor have I attempted to deceive or evade anything. If there’s been a misunderstanding, I’m open to clarifying, but I genuinely don’t know what I’ve done wrong. I respectfully request that this block be reconsidered so I can continue learning and contributing in good faith. VeritasFlow (talk) 20:56, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are believed to be the same user behind the blocked account, Love.cinema.art. If so, you've been flagrantly violating WP:BLOCK, WP:EVADE, and WP:SOCK, not to mention your abuse of AI chatbots. Yamla (talk) 20:58, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VeritasFlow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

I’m a new user and I’ve tried to follow the rules as best I could. I joined because I’m passionate about visual arts and space topics, and I wanted to contribute and learn. I asked questions when I wasn’t sure about something, and I tried to be respectful. If there’s something I missed or misunderstood, I’d appreciate knowing what it was. I’m not here to argue I just want to understand and improve. If you’re sure the block is justified, I’ll accept it and leave peacefully. VeritasFlow (talk) 21:35, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is a block-evading sock of Love.cinema.art, as stated above. You'll need to request unblock from your original account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:28, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You still haven't addressed your abuse of multiple accounts. If you aren't going to address the reason for your block, you will lose access to your talk page here, too. --Yamla (talk) 21:39, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VeritasFlow (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

Request reason:

You mentioned the account love.cinema.art. I looked into that account and saw it was blocked for using LLM tools. But I want to make it clear that I have no connection to that account, and my mindset is completely different. I’m a new user who’s passionate about space and conceptual art. Please take a look at the page I created it shows how much effort and creativity I put into it. If that other user violated Wikipedia’s rules, I don’t think it’s fair to link me to their actions just because I’m new. I’ve asked questions and tried to learn, even from my mentor CanonNi. If I had known that asking questions or participating could be seen as a violation, I wouldn’t have done it. My intentions are clear: I’m here to learn and contribute. I hope you’ll give new users like me a chance to grow, instead of assuming we’re here to misuse the system. VeritasFlow (talk) 21:57, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This isn't convincing. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:03, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I concur with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Love.cinema.art. Technically, this user is Highly likely, just shy of Confirmed, to Love.cinema.art. I can see no plausible explanation for this being a coincidence. As the sockmaster account has had its talk page access revoked, I will do so here as well. --Yamla (talk) 22:04, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked because an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the Unblock Ticket Request System that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

Concern regarding User:VeritasFlow/sandbox

Hello, VeritasFlow. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:VeritasFlow/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:08, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:VeritasFlow/sandbox

Hello, VeritasFlow. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:38, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]