User talk:UsernamesArePublic.Unfortunately.

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, UsernamesArePublic.Unfortunately.! My name is FishandChipper. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or press the "Request Help" button at the bottom of this message. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some pages that will help you while you edit Wikipedia:

How to edit a page

Tutorial

Sandbox, the place where you can experiment

Where to ask a question.

What this site is based on

Manual of Style

What Wikipedia is not

Here are some ways you can help improve Wikipedia:

Create an article

Help remove vandalism

Translate an article

Improve illustrations and upload new images

Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you

Contribute mottos to Motto of the Day

You can also have the people at Motto of the day create a motto for you to live by on Wikipedia at the Motto Shop.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or press the "Request Help" button below. Again, welcome! FishandChipper (talk) 19:58, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Just found out about this plugin, freakin sweet

FishandChipper 🐟🍟 17:52, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

damn i didn't even see this until now! UsernamesArePublic.Unfortunately. (talk) 19:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People with developmental coordination disorder

A tag has been placed on Category:People with developmental coordination disorder indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please try "Show preview"

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Category:Transgender topics in Cape Verde, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 18:58, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ugandan transgender women

Please populate the categories you create with more than one person. If you can't get enough people, then the category doesn't need to be made yet. ^SMason_Garrison 16:50, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I can't find any other Ugandan trans women with Wikipedia articles so I have taken Cleopatra Kambugu Kentaro out of the Ugandan transgender women category and into the Ugandan transgender people, Ugandan LGBTQ women, and transgender women categories. It is my understanding that an empty category will be deleted, but I don't know how to delete it or if I even have the power to delete it. UsernamesArePublic.Unfortunately. (talk) 21:11, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I propose adding a transgender women activists category. There are many people in the transgender women category who are not listed in a subcategory, and many of them are activists. I created more nationality subcategories to reduce the number of articles in that category rather than in a subcategory but maybe instead creating a subcategory for transgender women activists would be a better solution. Or maybe it isn't a problem at all that needs a solution. UsernamesArePublic.Unfortunately. (talk) 21:26, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

please slow down, and review how WP:categorization works before making more categories. ^SMason_Garrison 22:43, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please also don't remove 21st-century LGBTQ people from 21st-century people. These are non-diffusing categories, per WP:EGRS. ^SMason_Garrison 22:54, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:LGBTQ people from Georgia (country) by century has been nominated for merging

Category:LGBTQ people from Georgia (country) by century has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 17:23, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century Azerbaijani LGBTQ people has been nominated for splitting

Category:21st-century Azerbaijani LGBTQ people has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 17:30, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century Niuean LGBTQ people has been nominated for splitting

Category:21st-century Niuean LGBTQ people has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 22:58, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ugandan transgender women

A tag has been placed on Category:Ugandan transgender women indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:05, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century Slovenian LGBTQ poets has been nominated for merging

Category:21st-century Slovenian LGBTQ poets has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 23:07, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century Macedonian LGBTQ people has been nominated for merging

Category:21st-century Macedonian LGBTQ people has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 19:04, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 21st-century anarchists

Hey there, thanks for creating the category for 21st-century anarchists and populating it, it's coming along quite nicely! I just wanted to ask you take a bit more care with adding certain articles to it, as I've had to revert a few that I did not think fit into the category (i.e. people who died in the early-21st century and whose main association with anarchism was in the 20th century). I think this category makes sense for people whose involvement with anarchism has taken place in the 21st century, but I don't think every 20th-century anarchist who happened to still be alive in the 21st century should be included, if that makes sense. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:39, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair enough, I was wondering whether or not I should have added some of them to the list but there's so many people to add that I decided to first add anyone who was alive in the 21st century to save time and flesh the list out quicker, and then later check back on the ones who died early in the 21st century to see if they actually contributed anything noteworthy to anarchism during the 21st century. Now that the category has become more fleshed out I will take your advice and pay more attention to this. UsernamesArePublic.Unfortunately. (talk) 17:44, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good to hear, thanks! --Grnrchst (talk) 18:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who had this category (accurately) added to the page about me, I just wanted to say that your username made me smile. Jessamyn (my talk page) 17:45, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!! You've been doing impressive work judging by your Wikipedia page, well done! UsernamesArePublic.Unfortunately. (talk) 20:48, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:21st-century anarchists has been nominated for merging

Category:21st-century anarchists has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ^SMason_Garrison 04:45, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ecuadorian women filmmakers

A tag has been placed on Category:Ecuadorian women filmmakers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:46, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Locus Award–winning writers

A tag has been placed on Category:Locus Award–winning writers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:02, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Eastern European films has been nominated for merging to Category:European films by country

Category:Eastern European films has been nominated for merging to Category:European films by country. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 13:54, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

World Population Review is not reliable

You recently cited World Population Review here. It is self-published, so is not a reliable source. It has been discussed several times before at the reliable sources noticeboard:

Please do not cite it. If something on the site is true, there must be a better source for it. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:48, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into it tomorrow to see if there's a better source, and if not I'm fine with removing it. What's more important to me is that it doesn't get reverted back to the misleading 79% statistic, as has happened before when someone took issue with a different source I used from 2013 being too old. I would rather there be no statistic because at least that wouldn't be misleading anyone. UsernamesArePublic.Unfortunately. (talk) 01:55, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Films directed by Siân Heder has been nominated for merging

Category:Films directed by Siân Heder has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DoubleCross (‡) 21:37, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2026

Hello and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I saw that a category you created, Category:16th-century French non-fiction writers has not been used on more than one page. According to the guideline Wikipedia:Categorization, categories should be populated with multiple articles. Please help by adding other articles to the categories you create. You can take a look at the categorization FAQ. If you need further help, feel free to ask me or ask at the Teahouse. please populate the categories you create, and please don't please don't add categories to these templates please make a null edit instead. ^SMason_Garrison 22:44, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Everlasting (novel) has been accepted

The Everlasting (novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ScalarFactor (talk) 00:53, 12 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bury Our Bones in the Midnight Soil has been accepted

Bury Our Bones in the Midnight Soil, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ScalarFactor (talk) 01:07, 12 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: My Friends (Backman novel) has been accepted

My Friends (Backman novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 23% of accepted submissions, well done! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ScalarFactor (talk) 04:45, 14 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tithi Bhattacharya, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salon was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 22:41, 15 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

sort keys

Please be more careful when you create categories. You often forget to add sort keys. For example, Category:Australian sex education advocates did not have any sort keys. ^SMason_Garrison 03:13, 19 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Everlasting (novel), a link pointing to the disambiguation page Locus was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 22:07, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Television series set in the 1550s

A tag has been placed on Category:Television series set in the 1550s indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:46, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Television series set in the 1500s

A tag has been placed on Category:Television series set in the 1500s indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:47, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Television series set in the 1510s

A tag has been placed on Category:Television series set in the 1510s indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:47, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Television series set in the 1590s

A tag has been placed on Category:Television series set in the 1590s indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:48, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note about HotCat

Hi! This isn't a warning or anything. I just saw your edits on Junie (novel) and saw each category was being added individually. If you weren't aware (I wasn't either at first), clicking the "+⁺" towards the left of the Categories bar with HotCat installed allows you to add multiple categories in one edit. Fundgy (talk) 19:30, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks! I didn't know that actually, that makes things a lot easier! UsernamesArePublic.Unfortunately. (talk) 20:01, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi UsernamesArePublic.Unfortunately.. Thank you for your work on Junie (novel). Another editor, CostalCal, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for the clarification!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|CostalCal}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

CostalCal (talk) 20:53, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Everlasting cover.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Everlasting cover.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Not quite dead yet.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Not quite dead yet.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:43, 20 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Columbus Girls Academy

Hello, UsernamesArePublic.Unfortunately.. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Columbus Girls Academy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note about book summaries

Hello! Thank you for creating several new book articles. In general they're really great, but I wanted to raise a concern I noticed while reviewing some of them at New Page Patrol: it looks like the synopses are being taken too closely from the Kirkus reviews. You may not be aware of this, but a close paraphrase of the source material can still be a copyright violation even if you do some rewording and reorganizing. It's clear you're also contributing some of your own writing to the synopses, but overall I think they are still "too close", and Wikipedia can't host copyright violations. It would be wonder if you could revisit some of those articles to write fresh synopses. It might help to be combining information from multiple book reviews, with a focus on distilling just the "who, what, where, why, when" and putting everything in chronological order, as a way to avoid re-creating their sentence structures. (Also, if you've ready any of the books, it would be GREAT if you could explain how they end!!) Let me know if you have any questions, and again, thanks for filling in some of Wikipedia's gaps for book articles! ~ le 🌸 valyn (talk) 21:29, 30 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, this might take a while but I'll try to work on this in the next few days! Thank you! Unfortunately I haven't read any of these books except for Over and Under the Snow, so I don't know how they end. I may try reading some of the shorter books, but there are so many that I don't have time to read them all. I agree that it would be good for the articles to contain information on the endings, and I welcome anyone who has read them to add this information, but I think it's better for an article to be incomplete than to be nonexistent so I created them anyway. UsernamesArePublic.Unfortunately. (talk) 22:01, 30 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 May 10 § "Somalian" to "Somali" across the board

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 May 10 § "Somalian" to "Somali" across the board on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ~Malvoliox (talk | contribs) 17:31, 10 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Columbus Girls Academy

Hello, UsernamesArePublic.Unfortunately.. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Columbus Girls Academy".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:26, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Films by Jordanian directors

A tag has been placed on Category:Films by Jordanian directors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]