Jump to content

User talk:ThomasNguyenTuan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2025

[edit]
icon
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your account has been blocked from editing because your username gives the impression that the account represents a group, team, club, organization, company, product, department, or website. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have chosen a new username that complies with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable, regardless of the username that you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid or compensated in any way, you must disclose who is paying you. You may also read our FAQ for article subjects.

Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a username change to this account.
  • To create a new account with a different username, simply log out of this account and then make a new one.
  • If you prefer to change the username of this account, you may do so by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
    • Before requesting your new username, check if it is still available. If the search says "There is no global account for [username]", the username is free to use.

The new username that you choose must represent you as an individual:

  • You are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it also identifies you individually. Examples include: "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

If your username does not represent a group, organization, department, website, or other entity described above, and if you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the following text to the bottom of your user talk page (this page): {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 

Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:24, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, 3jcn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, which will be reviewed by other editors. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:25, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for username change

[edit]
icon
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ThomasNguyenTuan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

I would like to change my username to clearly identify myself as an individual user. 3jcn (talk) 08:29, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I have renamed you. I have also placed your draft at Draft:3jcn music notation; draft space is the preferred location for draft submissions(which can be accessed via the Article Wizard. I have also added the information needed to submit it for a review- you should not directly place it in the encyclopedia yourself as you are writing about your own creation. Any Wikipedia article about it should primarily summarize what independent reliable sources have chosen on their own to say about it, not what you want to say about it. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 23 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 3jcn music notation (December 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:59, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, ThomasNguyenTuan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:59, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Recreating and submitting for review the same draft that was already last month deleted as being promotional seems a bit pointless.
On a wider note, I should probably also add that if, as it seems, your only interest here is to promote your invention, you are likely to get yourself blocked sooner or later. Please proceed with caution, or better yet find some other topics to edit about. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:05, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 3JCN Physics Simulation (December 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 02:42, 29 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 3JCN Physics Simulation (December 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Resubmitted without meaningful changes; previous decline still stands. Writing articles with LLMs is not allowed.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 02:14, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello "pythoncoder",
THank you for taking time to review my draft and for outlining the concerns. To help me improve the draft, I'd greatly appreciate it if you could provide specific examples to illustrate the issues you mentioned. For example, which statements you consider hallucinations; which references are non existent; etc.
THank you again for your time and guidance.
Thomas Nguyen Tuan ThomasNguyenTuan (talk) 01:10, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 3JCN Physics Simulation (January 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:37, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Dear DoubleGrazing,
Thank you very much for taking the time to review my draft and for your detailed and thoughtful feedback. I sincerely appreciate your guidance regarding Wikipedia’s standards on neutrality, verifiability, and notability.
If you have a moment, I would like to respectfully invite you to visit the 3JCN Physics Simulation website:
https://www.new3jcn.com/simulation.html
The platform has been used by physics instructors and students in many countries as a free, browser-based educational resource. Seeing the scope and classroom usage may help provide context as I work to revise the draft in a more neutral, encyclopedic manner and seek appropriate independent secondary sources.
I fully understand and respect Wikipedia’s policies, and my intention is to improve the submission so that it aligns with those standards rather than to promote the project. Thank you again for your time and for the important work you do supporting new contributors.
Best regards,
ThomasNguyenTuan ThomasNguyenTuan (talk) 21:14, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

January 2026

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:40, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:3jcn music notation

[edit]

Information icon Hello, ThomasNguyenTuan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:3jcn music notation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:3JCN Physics Simulation

[edit]

Information icon Hello, ThomasNguyenTuan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:3JCN Physics Simulation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:08, 28 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ThomasNguyenTuan&oldid=1361456956"