User talk:Sweeties56

February 2021

Hello, I'm Robertsky. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Chithi 2 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. – robertsky (talk) 15:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chithi 2, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Shinyedit^bonjour. 18:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Preethi Sharma moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Preethi Sharma, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Preethi Sharma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Preethi Sharma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 18:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interpretive content

Hi there, I have reverted these changes for a few reasons. 1) You made arbitrary changes to the cast order without providing a legitimate rationale. This tends to look like you're just ordering them per your own personal preference, which is not acceptable. 2) You also didn't format that content properly with line breaks. 3) We don't need interpretive labels like "hero" or "heroine" in the article. Few, if any quality articles contain this. A character description should describe who the character is and what their goals are and how they interact with others, and that would communicate who the heroes and antagonists are without using interpretive labels. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same issue here. We're not interested in your interpretive content. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits, most recently here, where you continue to add interpretive (and pointless) content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chithi 2 have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chithi 2 was changed by Sweeties56 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952103 on 2021-02-21T16:47:34+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:22, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]