User talk:Strayacj

Rugby football

Looking at your edits, it's quickly obvious that you've changed the name of the subject in the first line and broken URLs in some reference. You need to discuss this sweeping change at the talk page and see if there are portions of it that are usable and that there is consensus for.

If you keep forcing in a broken version, it's hard to view that as anything other than intentional disruption at this point. —C.Fred (talk) 13:00, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to have a source for every sentence. Who is vandalising the document now? Strayacj (talk) 08:11, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If I thought you were editing in bad faith, I'd have given a stock warning that you'd be blocked if you continued. I don't think you're editing in bad faith, but your edits have had a net disruptive effect on the article. Further, to the extent that other editors have challenged your additions, you're involved in a content dispute, and edit warring is unconstructive. —C.Fred (talk) 13:17, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rugby football, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public school was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

February 2026

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Rugby football) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 02:17, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:34, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed socking via Fjrql1845.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:34, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]