User talk:Starhunterfan

Welcome!

Hello, Starhunterfan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! The Neokid talk 11:31, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tedallen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tedallen.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShadowHalo 05:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Kyandouglas.jpg has been tagged for the same reason. ShadowHalo 05:16, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Cruise: An Unauthorized Biography

Please see my question on the talk page of the article above here. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 21:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia Moffett

Hi, I reverted your unexplained revert of the "never spoken to press" lines in Georgia Moffett - the lines are unsupported opinions and you need to give sourced reasons for including them. You also need to give reasons for edit changes. Please discuss at the talk page if you disagree. Thanks. Jamesinderbyshire (talk) 07:49, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reversed your "correction" of my correction regarding Georgia Moffett's son's name as a) the birth record on Ancestry states that his name was recorded as Ty and b) my brother is a close friend of Georgia and has informed me that the much-reported name Tyler is incorrect. My apologies for not adding a source the first time I made the change. Gwdihŵ (talk) 21:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

Hi. When you recently edited Playhouse Presents, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moffett name

What's your source for the assertion that his name is "Tyler"? The only source that's been in the article (until recently) has it as "Ty". Thanks.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Moffett and her parents have given many dozens (if not hundreds) of print and TV interviews stating that the child's name is Tyler, it's always, always been reported as Tyler, everywhere. It's never been listed as Ty before. This is literally the first time anyone's suggested that his name is not Tyler. Just do a Google search or look at the Daily Mail site or her approved fansite, every single article and website says Tyler. The Ancestry.com link states that a Ty Peter Moffett or Ty Peter Martin-Moffett (both names are listed on the site) was born in Hammersmith in May 2002, but Georgia's son was born in March, and where does 'Martin-Moffett' come from? I have heard through my own connections that he has always gone by Ty and that she may have changed his name legally to Ty when she changed his surname by deed poll last year, but there seems no doubt that his legal birth name is Tyler. This is utterly bizarre. Unfortunately Nexis is down right now or I'd post a bunch of articles. Starhunterfan (talk) 22:20, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are no records for a Tyler Moffett in the right place at the right time. There are some in 2003, but they're in Lancashire. As for the date of birth, Ancestry only states the date of registration of the birth, which can be up to six weeks later (this is the legal limit, unless one wants to pay a fine). The birth of my own great-grandfather, Sydney S Evans, was registered six weeks after the actual event. As for "Martin-Moffett", all I can say is that this *may* indicate the surname of Ty's natural father, since everything else matches the other record. I would like to see the articles mentioned to see if Georgia unequivocally states what her son's name is, or whether it's something that could have been changed or assumed by the writer of the article. If you could post some links, I'd appreciate that. What I will say is that my source is *very* close to Georgia herself, and has stated to me that it was stated to him, by her, that the short form of her son's name is the one he was registered with. I'd rather not divulge too much out of a desire to protect those involved - I just wanted to set the record straight. Gwdihŵ (talk) 00:30, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Starhunterfan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Starhunterfan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Graham (playwright), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Finding Neverland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Sheen performances, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Morgan Lloyd Malcom.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Morgan Lloyd Malcom.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Hey, I hope you are doing well. Could you please not say "Reverted vandalism" unless you are actually reverting vandalism, as you did at Ashling O'Shea? I removed the content that the IP added as the sources weren't reliable and it seemed to be a BLP issue, as it was tagged in the edit summary. Removal a source for BLPs with explanation is not vandalism – you may disagree, but vandalism isn't the right word in this case DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 01:45, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Remove any reference to the fact an openly queer actor played a lesbian character in a play written by an openly queer female writer (with three citations to the official site and various interviews) is fairly blatant homophobic censorship. If you had a problem with the cites you could easily have tagged them as needing to be replaced, or found new cites yourself; not simply censored any mention of the play entirely. Starhunterfan (talk) 12:33, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, but that is completely untrue. I am openly gay myself and if you read the page I have talked about her queer identity in the page itself - in the quote, in her Hollyoaks role, in the personal life section etc. Also, what are you on about regarding censoring of the play? That is ridiculous - I included it [1] here. I am sorry for not being polite, but I think you are being out of order here and misusing words such as "edit warring" and "vandalism". DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 12:36, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your original edit on 14 July removed any and all mention of the play entirely. Your current edits introduce incorrect info, such as referring to the play as a comedy when it's a comedy-drama, and removing other relevant info such as the fact the production is a revival of a 2017 play. Can you explain why? Starhunterfan (talk) 12:42, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, the original edit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ashling_O%27Shea&diff=1310237104&oldid=1300466145) posted by an IP was flagged as a possible BLP issue, and since it had sensitive information regarding BLP I removed it. I was meant to add the information using more reliable sources later that day but ended up having some health issues and forgot. Second of all, the "incorrect info" is sourced here [2] which call the play comedy (not comedy drama). Regarding the other relevant info, it is because A.) of the sourcing and B.) The GA review was against adding too much information from primary sources and so I did not want this article to lose its GA status, which I have worked so very hard to get. Also, the reason I reverted your additions was because they are not included in the sources and were also not included in the original IP edits and per WP:STICKTOTHESOURCE it should follow what the source says. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 12:47, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't care that the article is inaccurate then you don't care. You obviously are very possessive over that article, and not willing to work with others, which is a shame. I saw the play three times and want the play to be accurately represented, as lesbian representation is important.

I'm sorry for your health issues but you could easily have followed Wiki protocol by tagging it as needing better citations. Surely you can see that removing ALL mention of the fact the play exists will be perceived as censorship?

When you made the original edit back in July, if you had legitimate concerns about the citations, you could easily have simply cut it down to just "In 2025, O'Shea played the role of Jaz in Puppy." You didn't need to remove all mention of the play entirely. Starhunterfan (talk) 13:06, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do think that is completely unfair. I compromised and added the information back yesterday using more reliable sources. I also did follow WP protocol: WP:BLP says "Material about living persons added to any Wikipedia page must be written with the greatest care and attention to verifiability, neutrality, and avoidance of original research."

I did not leave the play mention as I didn't want to leave unsourced information, and was searching for sources when I then got ill and forgot to write the information in. I am genuinely sorry but I genuinely forgot, and I think it is quite rude to say I am "very possessive" just because I am following the source. It is great that you have seen the play three times but at the end of the day the source information is the most important. I think it is quite unfair that you say I am unwilling to work with others when I have added sourced information regarding the play to the article – if I was unwilling I wouldn't have done that, and I wouldn't have written a message here. I hate arguing with people but I have tried to meet you halfway and it seems to have not worked, and I want to remind you of WP:AGF, which I did in my edit summaries and on here. Also, I do understand the importance of lesbian representation, and it is part of the reason I made the article, as you can probably see from the quote and Hollyoaks prose. Regardless, I hope there's no more bad blood between us and that we can both continue contributing to this encleopyedia together. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 13:15, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I have done an extensive search and all the sources I have found have called the play a "comedy", not comedy drama. But if you find one that says comedy-drama, please feel free to add it. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 13:21, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ian Hallard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Park Theatre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Damned Ones

The article The Damned Ones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFF, should be deleted or moved to DRAFT until release

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:46, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Starhunterfan. Thank you for your work on The Damned Ones. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources - primarily secondary sources - and footnote each claim to back it up with reliable sources. Currently, the "plot" and "cast" sections are completely unsourced. Please also establish notability as per WP:NFILMS. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 13:30, 14 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Damned Ones for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Damned Ones is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Damned Ones until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Filmforme (talk) 06:22, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]