User talk:Shubhamkris

Article Vijaya (bow)

Thank you for your contribution, but don't edit as your wish. Whatever you feel, you please mention in article talk page. Don't edit without citing resources. If you edit in such a way that it violates content of the article, it might be treated as disruptive editing which further leads to loss of editing privileges. Thank you Sri Harsha 191817 (talk) 07:37, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Saaho. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Do not change direct quotations. At any rate, the consistent style across Indian film and other topics related to Indian commerce is to use crore, not billions. —C.Fred (talk) 17:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Saaho. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:18, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

INRConvert

Re: this, we do not use INRConvert templates in film infoboxes. This was decided in a discussion at WT:ICTF. Feel free to search the discussion archives if you care about the rationale. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Shubhamkris:, please read this and STOP using the convert template in the article lead or infobox like you are doing. It's getting disruptive. Stop. Ravensfire (talk) 02:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Mukunda. Again and again, you've been asked not to use the INRConvert template in infoboxes and yet you keep doing it. Your edits have all been reverted back to the correct layout, but this needs to stop. If you continue your disruptive edits, you very probably will end up blocked from editing. STOP. Ravensfire (talk) 14:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Boss Engira Bhaskaran. Stop putting the INRConvert template into infoboxees. You can see the warnings you've gotten about exactly this issue and the reasons. This is beyond disruptive at this point. STOP. Ravensfire (talk) 17:03, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing against community preferences is disruptive, and if you keep doing it after your block expires, the next block will be for longer. Also, your failure to respond to any of the notes above isn't doing you any favours. This is a community project. If you're unwilling to talk, you're probably not going to have many fans. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hiranyaksha, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Naga and Deva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Outlander07. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kalarippayattu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Outlander^07@talk 10:27, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop changing millions to crore

Again, please stop changing millions to crore, as you appear to have done again here. If a standard exists in an article, leave it alone. This isn't the Indian Wikipedia, this is a global Wikipedia, and not everybody knows what "crore" is. See MOS:COMMONALITY. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mukul Nag, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Phantom, Mast and Satta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ashtanga (eight limbs of yoga). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Hi, my edit comment said correctly that Wikipedia doesn't use lists in the lead section, and generally tries to minimise lists in text articles. This is not to be changed without broad consensus, and certainly not by edit-warring. If you want to discuss the matter, do so on the article's talk page. Many thanks for your understanding. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Prajapati

added links pointing to Manu, Krodha, Tapa, Marici and Angiras

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, I'm GreaterPonce665. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shivaji have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 13:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hemu, you may be blocked from editing. Alivardi (talk) 12:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Battle of Surat, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 20:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Shubhamkris! I noticed your contributions to Sino-Indian War and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Kautilya3 (talk) 11:53, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Hello, I'm GreaterPonce665. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shivaji have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 11:55, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Direct, reliable sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages now require direct reliable sources for additions. For details see the content guideline, the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide or the edit notice on any DOY page. Almost all new additions without a reliable source as a reference are now being reverted on-sight.

Please do not add new additions to these pages without direct sources as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages and you've been warned about this previously.

Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 04:14, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Karnal. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. - LouisAragon (talk) 13:52, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sino-Indian War, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 09:21, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]